Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Burkley
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15 next>>
Sep 24, 2023 14:00:49   #
RSV has changed. The severe airway difficulties related to RSV were once relegated to the very youngest and to winter months. Neither characteristic is still true. I will soon take a major overseas trip, am over 60 and so will likely get the RSV vaccine.

I both hate and love big pharma. The big pharma profits and advertising are obscene, but not nearly as terrible as the diseases big pharma has conquered. Governments have come up with very few viable medical treatments. The profit motive has a part in motivating almost all the development of new treatments, even when original discoveries come out of government labs. Developing and proving benefit are difficult endeavors in regards to therapeutics. It’s a pathway that is hard and takes years, so potential profits are a prime motivation for some wonderful things. No profit no cures.
Go to
Sep 20, 2023 05:19:45   #
Congrats on getting back into a wonderful passion. If you have the money, jump back in with a FF mirrorless. All the brands take great pictures, so look at a few. Dx cameras are cheaper. Light weight gear has advantages and the Micro 4/3 systems are much easier to carry but have a crop factor. Personally, I have had all of the above and prefer FF mirrorless in a Nikon. I use a converter with some of my rarely used but wonderful Nikon Fx lenses—wide angle, macro, fast primes. I also use my mirrored FF camera, a D850, as a second body on photography trips.

I prefer FF cameras because I often am off with my composition through the lens and want to do thoughtful cropping myself in Lightroom or Photoshop. If you buy a Canon Dx mirrorless you save money and can use your old lenses with a converter. If you have the money and FF is a must, use your old system as a second camera and get FF mirrorless with new lenses in whatever brand you like. If money is a concern, sell your old system. Research, handle different cameras, buy what you like. Purchase a walk around lens and a lens to suit your passion—portrait, wide angle for landscape, long for birds and animals. Add lenses over time. Whatever you decide, if buying new and you can get the money, I would move to mirrorless. My 2 cents and probably worth less.
Go to
Sep 15, 2023 01:17:07   #
September is a great month to visit. I use a 20mm 1.8 for landscape, a 24-70 as a walkabout, my favorite lens is the 70-200. For wildlife I take a 200-500. Hiking I affix the 70-200 with my 20 mm in a pocket.

For travel get a nice back pack, there are hundreds on B&H. I only carryon no matter the destination. Suitcase and backpack go everywhere. Never a problem in the US. I waste no time at the luggage carrousel. It takes a special traveling partner to travel light.

In Yellowstone for two days tea I like the East side of the park best: Tower Falls, Lamar Valley, Grand Canyon. Old Faithful Geyser Basin in the Central Park is hard to miss. Norris Basin is nice as are all the shorter marked trails to hot pots along the west side. The Grand Canyon is wonderful as the sun rises. About 7 am in September. Usually few people get up so early. Just prior to Sunset is quiet too, but the falls and canyon are shadowed. A tripod is mandatory. Have fun. Yellowstone is one of my favorite places. How are you arriving
Go to
Sep 13, 2023 22:21:47   #
pleonardjr wrote:
Going on Safari in October. Am planning on bringing my N200 with 18-300 DX lens and my N850 with 200-500 full frame lens. I have a 70-210 nikkor lens, a 28-70 nikkor and a 50 1.4 prime but don't think I will need them. Should I switch lenses on the cameras? I don't know how much reach I need for this, my first extensive wild-life, landscape trip. The N200 is still a dynamite camera, but I am loving my N850.


The Serengeti is a wonderful location for wildlife photography. I think you’ll find the D850 with the 200-500 5.6 lens will cover 95% of what you point at. Rarely have I wished for more length. I find myself smiling watching rich novice photographers swing a huge rented 800 mm lens into action and am grateful for the 200-500. You’ll likely see them too and smile. I put a 70-200 or equivalent on my second camera for portrait style closeups as animals move around the Land Rover. I have done some fun panoramic shots with a 20 mm 1.8 prime.

I would probably put the 18-300 on the D200. If the D850 goes down, you will put the 200-500 on the D200, so the added length of the 18-300 wouldn't matter much. But if the 200-500 goes down the 18-300 on the D200 will get you some great shots. I would take the 50 1.4 along for sure. You will make friends and taking evening shots of good times in the lodge captures the memories. You really don’t have anything with a wide angle and that wouldn’t bother me in the least. The Serengeti is so vast that I found capturing the expanse speckled with grazing animals with any artistic impact to be a challenge.

2 cameras with different focal lengths adds needed versatility in the vehicle. I only switch out lenses when at lunch because of dust. Period. No exceptions. At lunch I use a rocket to gently blow the dust off my lenses and then brush out any remaining particles. The mini rainy season can sometimes begin in late October, so hopefully dust will still be a major problem as the long dry season moves to its end.

2 pieces of advice. First, one piece of glass I always recommend taking is high quality binoculars. The guides all have piece of crap low end binoculars. I loan our guide my very nice Leupold binoculars and it makes a difference in what the guide finds among the grasses in the distance. Cabellas or B&H or Optic World or Nikon Refurbished or Adorama will have binoculars on sale for the fall hunt. A nice pair costs $250-500, not $1000-2000. You will see more animals. Second, and most importantly, at times put down your camera and sit in awe at what surrounds you.
Go to
Sep 12, 2023 17:57:13   #
berkspencer wrote:
I will be visiting Italy (Rome, Siena, Florence, and Cinque Terre) October 3 - 18, 2023. I have a Nikon D7500 and the following Nikkor lenses: 18-300 1:3.5-6.3; 18-70 1:3.5-4.5; 70-300 1:4-5.6; 10-20 1:4.5-5.6; and 35mm 1:1.8.
I have room for only two lenses; one on the body and one extra. What combination would you recommend?


I would take the 18-300 as a walk around lens. Then you need to decide if it is more important to have a fast lens (35 1.8) or a wide angle lens (10-20). I end up finding fairly good shots in shadowed streets and inside buildings, often of people. Although the 7500 is a great camera, it has some limitations at high ISO’s, so I would take the 35. You may want to take expansive landscapes with little interest in shots needing a fast lens, then the 10-20 is better.
Go to
Aug 26, 2023 13:56:20   #
srfmhg wrote:
One of my favorite Italian Renaissance artists is Sandro Botticelli and it was a treat to see his original works on display at the Uffizi. I did throw a few elbows to get some head on views of "The Birth of Venus" or as we called her in Fine Arts 13 - "Venus on the Half Shell".

Alessandro di Mariano di Vanni Filipepi (c. 1445 – May 17, 1510), better known as Sandro Botticelli (/ˌboʊtiˈtʃɛli/, BOH-tee-CHEL-ee, Italian: [ˈsandro bottiˈtʃɛlli]) or simply Botticelli, was an Italian painter of the Early Renaissance. Botticelli's posthumous reputation suffered until the late 19th century, when he was rediscovered by the Pre-Raphaelites who stimulated a reappraisal of his work. Since then, his paintings have been seen to represent the linear grace of late Italian Gothic and some Early Renaissance painting, even though they date from the latter half of the Italian Renaissance period.


Only one of Botticelli's paintings, the Mystic Nativity (National Gallery, London) is inscribed with a date (1501), but others can be dated with varying degrees of certainty on the basis of archival records, so the development of his style can be traced with some confidence. He was an independent master for all the 1470s, which saw his reputation soar. The 1480s were his most successful decade, the one in which his large mythological paintings were completed along with many of his most famous Madonnas. By the 1490s, his style became more personal and to some extent mannered. His last works show him moving in a direction opposite to that of Leonardo da Vinci (seven years his junior) and the new generation of painters creating the High Renaissance style, and instead returning to a style that many have described as more Gothic or "archaic".

Botticelli was born in the city of Florence in a house in the street still called Borgo Ognissanti. He lived in the same area all his life and was buried in his neighbourhood church called Ognissanti ("All Saints"). Sandro was one of several children to the tanner Mariano di Vanni d'Amedeo Filipepi and his wife Smeralda Filipepi, and the youngest of the four who survived into adulthood. The date of his birth is not known, but his father's tax returns in following years give his age as two in 1447 and thirteen in 1458, meaning he must have been born between 1444 and 1446.

The nickname Botticelli, meaning "little barrel", derives from the nickname of Sandro's brother, Giovanni, who was called Botticello apparently because of his round stature. A document of 1470 refers to Sandro as "Sandro Mariano Botticelli", meaning that he had fully adopted the name.

In 1481, Pope Sixtus IV summoned Botticelli and other prominent Florentine and Umbrian artists to fresco the walls of the newly completed Sistine Chapel. This large project was to be the main decoration of the chapel. Most of the frescos remain but are greatly overshadowed and disrupted by Michelangelo's work of the next century, as some of the earlier frescos were destroyed to make room for his paintings. The Florentine contribution is thought to be part of a peace deal between Lorenzo Medici and the papacy. After Sixtus was implicated in the Pazzi conspiracy hostilities had escalated into excommunication for Lorenzo and other Florentine officials and a small "Pazzi War".

Mythological subjects of the 1480s

The masterpieces Primavera (c. 1482) and The Birth of Venus (c. 1485) are not a pair, but are inevitably discussed together; both are in the Uffizi. They are among the most famous paintings in the world, and icons of the Italian Renaissance. As depictions of subjects from classical mythology on a very large scale they were virtually unprecedented in Western art since classical antiquity. Together with the smaller and less celebrated Venus and Mars and Pallas and the Centaur, they have been endlessly analysed by art historians, with the main themes being: the emulation of ancient painters and the context of wedding celebrations, the influence of Renaissance Neo-Platonism, and the identity of the commissioners and possible models for the figures.

Though all carry differing degrees of complexity in their meanings, they also have an immediate visual appeal that accounts for their enormous popularity. All show dominant and beautiful female figures in an idyllic world of feeling, with a sexual element. Continuing scholarly attention mainly focuses on the poetry and philosophy of contemporary Renaissance humanists. The works do not illustrate particular texts; rather, each relies upon several texts for its significance. Their beauty was characterized by Vasari as exemplifying "grace" and by John Ruskin as possessing linear rhythm. The pictures feature Botticelli's linear style at its most effective, emphasized by the soft continual contours and pastel colours.

The Primavera and the Birth were both seen by Vasari in the mid-16th century at the Villa di Castello, owned from 1477 by Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de' Medici, and until the publication in 1975 of a Medici inventory of 1499, it was assumed that both works were painted specifically for the villa. Recent scholarship suggests otherwise: the Primavera was painted for Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco's townhouse in Florence, and The Birth of Venus was commissioned by someone else for a different site.

Botticelli painted only a small number of mythological subjects, but these are now probably his best known works. A much smaller panel than those discussed before is his Venus and Mars in the National Gallery, London. This was of a size and shape to suggest that it was a spalliera, a painting made to fitted into either furniture, or more likely in this case, wood panelling. The wasps buzzing around Mars' head suggest that it may have been painted for a member of his neighbours the Vespucci family, whose name means "little wasps" in Italian, and who featured wasps in their coat of arms. Mars lies asleep, presumably after lovemaking, while Venus watches as infant satyrs play with his military gear, and one tries to rouse him by blowing a conch shell in his ear. The painting was no doubt given to celebrate a marriage, and decorate the bedchamber.

Three of these four large mythologies feature Venus, a central figure in Renaissance Neoplatonism, which gave divine love as important a place in its philosophy as did Christianity. The fourth, Pallas and the Centaur is clearly connected with the Medici by the symbol on Pallas' dress. The two figures are roughly life-size, and a number of specific personal, political or philosophic interpretations have been proposed to expand on the basic meaning of the submission of passion to reason.

The Medicis
Botticelli became associated by historians with the Florentine School under the patronage of Lorenzo de' Medici, a movement historians would later characterize as a "golden age".[98] The Medici family were effective rulers of Florence, which was nominally a republic, throughout Botticelli's lifetime up to 1494, when the main branch were expelled. Lorenzo il Magnifico became the head of the family in 1469, just around the time Botticelli started his own workshop. He was a great patron of both the visual and literary arts, and encouraged and financed the humanist and Neoplatonist circle from which much of the character of Botticelli's mythological painting seems to come. In general Lorenzo does not seem to have commissioned much from Botticelli, preferring Pollaiuolo and others,[99] although views on this differ.[100] A Botticello who was
probably Sandro's brother Giovanni was close to Lorenzo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandro_Botticelli

For more images from The Uffizi, please see my previous post:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-784147-1.html#14117372
I hope you enjoy these images as well as my brief art history lesson!
Mark
One of my favorite Italian Renaissance artists is ... (show quote)


One of the great tragedies in art is the number of Botticelli works that were destroyed by Renaissance religious zealots. Beautiful photos. The Uffizi is one of the great galleries of the world and one of the few where you can see paintings by Michelangelo, de Vinci, Raphael, Botticelli and Titian in the same morning.
Go to
Aug 13, 2023 23:43:24   #
South Africa is a beautiful country with so much more to see than majestic animals while on a safari. Sites include Cape Town, the drive along the East Cape Coast, Johannesburg, Durban beaches, the Western Cape, Namibia etc., etc. I love Tanzania. I have been to the Serengeti twice and will go a few more times in the next couple of years. They are very different trips, both are great. Don’t let anyone talk you into or out of either.
Go to
Aug 9, 2023 17:41:39   #
Dave H2 wrote:
I made one using vinly covered wire like the type used in dog leashes. A couple of clamps and clips from the hardware store and it's done. I used it when traveling to Europe a few years back. It sits in parallel to the regular shoulder strap. I ditched the Nikon advertising strap to avoid showing the world the value of my camera. I agree with the comment about the danger of strangulation without a break away ability but to me the risk was worth it.
D


I own the PacSafe camera straps but don’t use them any longer. They were uncomfortable. Pretty much any of my camera straps are strong enough to strangle me if it got caught on something and fall or if a motorcycle rider tried to ride off with my camera draped across my neck. Any of my straps can get cut with a very sharp knife. Having said that, I enter any crowd with my hand on my camera. If I stop to look at something, my hand goes to my camera. If I walk by a road, the camera is on the inside away from the road. A determined thief will unfortunately get your possessions. My goal is to make it more comfortable for a thief to steal from everyone else rather than from me.
Go to
Aug 3, 2023 00:42:38   #
I would look first at the new Really Right Stuff travel tripods with an integrated head. Exceptional but expensive. The long version will fit your tall frame. Then I would look at Gitzo. Also exceptional with a great travel tripod. Then I would look at Manfrotto, Sirui, Peak Design and Benro. There is no comparison between the quality of my RRS and my less expensive but still competent Benro. I would get the best tripod that you can afford. Do not go cheap. Quality matters.
Go to
Aug 2, 2023 18:25:53   #
larryepage wrote:
The OP tells us that a trip to Iceland is driving this lens. I infer from that , and from the statement that low light situations are involved, that the Northern Lights are a key target here. F/2.8 seems important. Filters do not.


I can see your point. I just thought Iceland is a land of water and interesting light and an ND or circular polarizer can create nice effects. Those are harder to use on a 14-28 2.8.
Go to
Aug 2, 2023 17:27:31   #
User ID wrote:
ND filters ?? The OP is wondering if f/2.8 is sufficient or whether he needs f/1.8 !


The Nikon 14-24 2.8 does not accept traditional round threaded filters. If you use an ND, which creates some very nice landscape effects in regards to clouds, sunsets and water, the 14-24 2.8 creates some extra difficulties. Although you’re right, it doesn’t relate to the question, the comment points to another factor to consider in choosing.
Go to
Aug 2, 2023 14:12:18   #
I don’t like the distortion of the 14-18 mm focal length. I use the 20 mm 1.8 prime lens. It is relatively inexpensive, razor sharp and light weight. The 20 mm 1.2 is exceptional but not worth the additional cost for my uses.
Go to
Aug 2, 2023 13:54:13   #
Dynamics5 wrote:
Would like recommendations for a strong or slash proof camera strap for travels.


Peak Design 1 1/2” or 2” depending on camera and lens weight. Peak Design is my day to day preferred strap.

Pacsafe makes excellent theft resistant products. PacSafe camera straps have special theft resistant clasps and a steel cable running through the strap. I use them in high theft areas like Paris. I find them slightly more bulky and less flexible but still comfortable.
Go to
Jul 31, 2023 14:15:01   #
Paris is a favorite. The classic photo from Musee d Orsay from the 5th floor clocks. The Catacombs with all the bones. Le Chapelle is marvelous within the ministry of Justice Compound, but now entered from outside the wall. The Rodin museum. Street photography within the neighborhoods by the Eiffel Tower and in the 9th Arrondissement and in Montmartre. If you have time, head to Normandy. Giverny is crowded now, but still nice. Night photography all over. It’s the city of lights.
Go to
Jul 31, 2023 12:11:36   #
Suitcase style wheeled bags like the Think Tank or Tenba products are great, but I struggle to use mine unless I am traveling to a specific single building shoot or only sitting in a car. They simply are inconvenient for walking around a tourist city or hiking any distance from a parking lot. Given the gear you want to take with you, if possible I would go to a local photography store with the gear and put it in different bags before deciding. Even if you don’t like a specific bag at the store, it will give you an idea about the size: 30 Liter, 35 L or 45-50 L. They all can be carried on.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 15 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.