Posts for: NOSLEEP
Dec 19, 2013 23:59:58 #
The Robertson Family official statement:
We want to thank all of you for your prayers and support. The family has spent much time in prayer since learning of A&E's decision. We want you to know that first and foremost we are a family rooted in our faith in God and our belief that the Bible is His word. While some of Phils unfiltered comments to the reporter were coarse, his beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible. Phil is a Godly man who follows what the Bible says are the greatest commandments: Love the Lord your God with all your heart and Love your neighbor as yourself. Phil would never incite or encourage hate. We are disappointed that Phil has been placed on hiatus for expressing his faith, which is his constitutionally protected right. We have had a successful working relationship with A&E but, as a family, we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm. We are in discussions with A&E to see what that means for the future of Duck Dynasty. Again, thank you for your continued support of our family.
We want to thank all of you for your prayers and support. The family has spent much time in prayer since learning of A&E's decision. We want you to know that first and foremost we are a family rooted in our faith in God and our belief that the Bible is His word. While some of Phils unfiltered comments to the reporter were coarse, his beliefs are grounded in the teachings of the Bible. Phil is a Godly man who follows what the Bible says are the greatest commandments: Love the Lord your God with all your heart and Love your neighbor as yourself. Phil would never incite or encourage hate. We are disappointed that Phil has been placed on hiatus for expressing his faith, which is his constitutionally protected right. We have had a successful working relationship with A&E but, as a family, we cannot imagine the show going forward without our patriarch at the helm. We are in discussions with A&E to see what that means for the future of Duck Dynasty. Again, thank you for your continued support of our family.
Sep 25, 2013 13:52:36 #
Hurt Feelings Report...
I found it. Just fill in and send to admin...
Sep 24, 2013 15:04:35 #
Sep 21, 2013 19:55:15 #
bgl wrote:
Exactly what is the point you are making? What yo... (show quote)
Everyone with any sense knows climate changes overtime. Speaking of cherry picking statements isn't it about time you climate alarmists stop doing just that. There is no reason to continue to pursue stupidity for stupidities sake.
Yes... It is a repeatable natural phenomenon and it has occurred over and over again over tens of hundreds of thousands of years. However I do think that if you personally were to send Al Gore some money he could continue to save the planet from global warming. My advice is you should not waist any time getting to it... Cheers.
Sep 19, 2013 22:32:19 #
Scientists finally admit they were wrong...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10310712/Top-climate-scientists-admit-global-warming-forecasts-were-wrong.html
A leaked draft of a report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is understood to concede that the computer predictions for global warming and the effects of carbon emissions have been proved to be inaccurate.
The report, to be published later this month, is a six year assessment which is seen as the gospel of climate science and is cited to justify fuel taxes and subsidies for renewable energy.
The summary for policymakers of the report, seen by the Mail on Sunday, states that the world is warming at a rate of 0.12C per decade since 1951, compared to a prediction of 0.13C per decade in their last assessment published in 2007.
Other admission in the latest document include that forecast computers may not have taken enough notice of natural variability in the climate, therefore exaggerating the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures.
The governments which fund the IPCC have tabled 1,800 questions in relation to the report.
Related Articles
Hack the planet to counter climate change, says Lord Rees
12 Sep 2013
Climate change killed the woolly mammoth, researchers claim
11 Sep 2013
Summers are getting hotter honest
11 Sep 2013
One of the central issues is believed to be why the IPCC failed to account for the pause in global warming, which they admit that they did not predict in their computer models. Since 1997, world average temperatures have not shown any statistically significant increase.
The summary also shows that scientist have now discovered that between 950 and 1250 AD, before the Industrial Revolution, parts of the world were as warm for decades at a time as they are now.
Despite a 2012 draft stating that the world is at its warmest for 1,300 years, the latest document states: 'Surface temperature reconstructions show multi-decadal intervals during the Medieval Climate Anomaly (950-1250) that were in some regions as warm as in the late 20th Century.
The 2007 report included predictions of a decline in Antarctic sea ice, but the latest document does not explain why this year it is at a record high.
The 2013 report states: 'Most models simulate a small decreasing trend in Antarctic sea ice extent, in contrast to the small increasing trend in observations ...
There is low confidence in the scientific understanding of the small observed increase in Antarctic sea ice extent.'
The 2007 forecast for more intense hurricanes has also been ignored in the new document after this year was one of the quietest hurricane seasons in history.
One of the report's authors, Professor Myles Allen, the director of Oxford University's Climate Research Network, has said that people should not look to the IPCC for a bible on climate change.
Professor Allen, who admits we need to look very carefully about what the IPCC does in future, said that he could not comment on the report as it was still considered to be in its draft stages.
However, he added: It is a complete fantasy to think that you can compile an infallible or approximately infallible report, that is just not how science works.
It is not a bible, it is a scientific review, an assessment of the literature. Frankly both sides are seriously confused on how science works - the critics of the IPCC and the environmentalists who credit the IPCC as if it is the gospel."
Scientist were constantly revising their research to account for new data, he said.
Despite the uncertainties and contradictions, the IPCC insists that it is more confident than ever 95 per cent certain - that global warming is mainly humans fault.
Next week 40 of the 250 authors who contributed to the report and representatives of most of the 195 governments that fund the IPCC will hold a meeting in Stockholm to discuss the finding to discuss any issues ahead of the publication. The body has insisted that this is not a crisis meeting but a pre-planned discussion.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10310712/Top-climate-scientists-admit-global-warming-forecasts-were-wrong.html
A leaked draft of a report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is understood to concede that the computer predictions for global warming and the effects of carbon emissions have been proved to be inaccurate.
The report, to be published later this month, is a six year assessment which is seen as the gospel of climate science and is cited to justify fuel taxes and subsidies for renewable energy.
The summary for policymakers of the report, seen by the Mail on Sunday, states that the world is warming at a rate of 0.12C per decade since 1951, compared to a prediction of 0.13C per decade in their last assessment published in 2007.
Other admission in the latest document include that forecast computers may not have taken enough notice of natural variability in the climate, therefore exaggerating the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures.
The governments which fund the IPCC have tabled 1,800 questions in relation to the report.
Related Articles
Hack the planet to counter climate change, says Lord Rees
12 Sep 2013
Climate change killed the woolly mammoth, researchers claim
11 Sep 2013
Summers are getting hotter honest
11 Sep 2013
One of the central issues is believed to be why the IPCC failed to account for the pause in global warming, which they admit that they did not predict in their computer models. Since 1997, world average temperatures have not shown any statistically significant increase.
The summary also shows that scientist have now discovered that between 950 and 1250 AD, before the Industrial Revolution, parts of the world were as warm for decades at a time as they are now.
Despite a 2012 draft stating that the world is at its warmest for 1,300 years, the latest document states: 'Surface temperature reconstructions show multi-decadal intervals during the Medieval Climate Anomaly (950-1250) that were in some regions as warm as in the late 20th Century.
The 2007 report included predictions of a decline in Antarctic sea ice, but the latest document does not explain why this year it is at a record high.
The 2013 report states: 'Most models simulate a small decreasing trend in Antarctic sea ice extent, in contrast to the small increasing trend in observations ...
There is low confidence in the scientific understanding of the small observed increase in Antarctic sea ice extent.'
The 2007 forecast for more intense hurricanes has also been ignored in the new document after this year was one of the quietest hurricane seasons in history.
One of the report's authors, Professor Myles Allen, the director of Oxford University's Climate Research Network, has said that people should not look to the IPCC for a bible on climate change.
Professor Allen, who admits we need to look very carefully about what the IPCC does in future, said that he could not comment on the report as it was still considered to be in its draft stages.
However, he added: It is a complete fantasy to think that you can compile an infallible or approximately infallible report, that is just not how science works.
It is not a bible, it is a scientific review, an assessment of the literature. Frankly both sides are seriously confused on how science works - the critics of the IPCC and the environmentalists who credit the IPCC as if it is the gospel."
Scientist were constantly revising their research to account for new data, he said.
Despite the uncertainties and contradictions, the IPCC insists that it is more confident than ever 95 per cent certain - that global warming is mainly humans fault.
Next week 40 of the 250 authors who contributed to the report and representatives of most of the 195 governments that fund the IPCC will hold a meeting in Stockholm to discuss the finding to discuss any issues ahead of the publication. The body has insisted that this is not a crisis meeting but a pre-planned discussion.
Sep 13, 2013 11:02:55 #
Been there once when I was young. Thought it was an interesting article...
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/09/11/folks-living-in-this-tiny-outpost-on-the-alaskan-border-may-use-canadian-dollars-but-theyre-still-100-american/
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/09/11/folks-living-in-this-tiny-outpost-on-the-alaskan-border-may-use-canadian-dollars-but-theyre-still-100-american/
Hyder Alaska
Jul 24, 2013 14:18:18 #
Hal81 wrote:
The people in this country are going nuts.
The people are nuts...
Jul 24, 2013 14:16:04 #
GSQRD1 wrote:
You are very concerned about the rise of "gre... (show quote)
I am looking forward to spending my retirement years here in Canada. A warming climate and some palm trees would only serve to make it more inviting. I think so I must be... Cheers.
Jul 24, 2013 00:48:57 #
Richard94611 wrote:
Your analogy is a false one.
If you say so. :roll:
Jul 23, 2013 23:10:57 #
Richard94611 wrote:
Cancer is a natural occurrence, too. But if you got it, I bet you would go see a doctor and try to get cured.
Climate change dogma is not dissimilar to the cancer pharmaceutical industry. A cash cow multi billion dollar PROFFIT enterprise with no cure...
Jul 23, 2013 12:42:40 #
matt thomas wrote:
No sleep...
Your photo is in bad taste...you wouldn't like someone posting that if it were your own child or grandchild. You don't like the royals and that's fine but your sense of humor is down, dirty and gross.
Your photo is in bad taste...you wouldn't like someone posting that if it were your own child or grandchild. You don't like the royals and that's fine but your sense of humor is down, dirty and gross.
No sense of hehe...
Jul 23, 2013 12:30:08 #
RixPix wrote:
I thought the image was funny. It shows the paran... (show quote)
As illustrated by this post. Todays modern Liberals do not have a clear understanding of the concept of freedom or liberty. Only a clear contempt for it. Very disturbing mentality...
Jul 22, 2013 23:45:46 #
alaskan wrote:
Unfortunately you did not understand the sarcasm o... (show quote)
I had a 50-50 chance of reading it right... I agree. The double standard is a significant element responsible for lessening the odds of achieving a future post racial America...
Jul 22, 2013 21:52:53 #
alaskan wrote:
The article takes care to mention what color was the SUV but not the race of the family.In today`s post racial America race seems very important so why suddenly we are not informed? Could it be that the family was black and GZ would look less "racist"?
No. In a "post racial America" what difference would knowledge of skin colour make to the general public...
In a racial America skin colour would be of heightened interest...
Jul 22, 2013 19:25:21 #
pounder35 wrote:
Was race involved? Was the family white or Hispanic? If they had been black would GZ had kept going and make this a racial issue so the media can jump all over it. If the SUV had been a foreign model maybe that could have raised a racist issue. Come on media. There's got to be a way to milk this and spin it. Maybe GZ actually caused the accident and is lying about not witnessing it. Hmmmm. :shock:
I was thinking it must have been a racist accident too. :mrgreen: