Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Sam55
Page: 1 2 next>>
Jan 11, 2012 17:54:46   #
I have been to the Biltmore Estate, Plan on a whole day at least to see everything, and it should be beautiful in April. If you happen to be in the central part of the state, the NC Zoological Park near Asheboro, is really nice. Also check out, WWW.ourstate.com which is the website of a NC State magazine that has lots of ideas that might interest you. They will be glad to sell you a subscription also if you want one.
Go to
Jan 7, 2012 07:29:13   #
Adirondack Hiker wrote:
Why do so many spend $1200-$1500 on a camera, want to add a high end lens, then treat it like a p&s by leaving it in AUTO mode, and using free software to process the images, or worse, take the memory card to the corner store, then complain about the results? While CS5 is overkill, no free program, or one size fits all machine can come close to matching the results that can be achieved in programs such as Elements.


The reason that I personally wanted to try some of the free programs was to learn. I have never done any PP on the computer so did hot have a clue where to start. With the price of some of the programs, I felt that I had to make the same choice about it as I did when I purchased the camera, buy once! However I will not get on here and cry about my choices, I will do the best that I can with what I have. After all is said and done I am trying to make things better for myself.
Go to
Dec 31, 2011 06:28:43   #
ces308 wrote:
disijudy wrote:
I'm a newbie with this camera - sounds like it was pretty popular this Christmas.
Two problems I'm having with the 18-55 lens the camera came packaged with--
1) the camera sometimes takes way too long to focus & the photo ends up not being focused at all. I'm trying to focus on eyes.
2) Sometimes the photo refuses to "take". Am I too close? Too far away?
I'm frustrated. Gotta get one of those good books mentioned in these discussions. I've been wishing I can find a community class, but so far it's not happened.
I'm a newbie with this camera - sounds like it was... (show quote)


I found if you are looking live through the LCD ,it takes longer to focus and wait for the green box....if you look through the veiw finder it is spot on and instant .If it 's not focused,it will not take,or it takes but what you want is out of focus....am I helping you at all?? Once I got that figured out I have been golden ! I love this camera !

chris
quote=disijudy I'm a newbie with this camera - so... (show quote)


I love this camera also. I have found that when it comes to focusing, if you are looking through the view finder, pay attention to the red dots in the frame. Make sure one of them is on the area that you want in perfect focus and it will focus on that area, If you don't it will grab something that is in one of those and focus on that, and then take the picture.
Go to
Dec 30, 2011 22:49:07   #
LawnDog08 wrote:
I have a Canon T2i and I bought it with a Fujifilm 4gb class 6 SD card. I'm learning the camera more and I'm looking to upgrade the SD card to start shooting in RAW format. The question is what brand and GB / Class size to go with? I've heard bigger isn't always better, but I'm just looking for an upgrade that won't fail or corrupt the camera. I've read the horror stories in the reviews on some of the cards and quite frankly I'm becoming more confused. Any info would be great but I'm curious as to what other Canon users out there have in their cameras for SDHC or SDXC cards? I understand that there is a risk of getting a "lemon" card with any brand. I have had great luck with the one I am using now and I guess I'm just looking for a little help weeding through the BS in some of these reviews! Thanks for the help in advance.
I have a Canon T2i and I bought it with a Fujifilm... (show quote)


I have a Canon T3i that came with a PNY class 10 8GB sd card. Worked great for stills and still does, but when I tried to shoot any video, it would not keep up with the camera for more than a few seconds and then the thing would just stop recording. Got a Sandisk extreme Pro rated at over 90 meg/sec write speed and I am doing video just fine now. So BS aside, you will get what you pay for. You may find a cheap one that will work, and then you just may not. I want one that I know is going to work, so I will buy the best that I can find. I will stick with Sandisk.
Go to
Dec 27, 2011 08:40:02   #
kcornman wrote:
photogrl57 wrote:
Funny thing while researching this question I found out it's illegal to take photographs on military bases. I can't tell you how many times I've done that here.



I shot a few thousand on the Niagara Air Base this last summer at the air show there. I lugged 2 bodies, 6 lenses, and flash around in my pack. Shot picks of pretty much every plane static and flying over two days. None of the MP's ever mentioned anything about not shooting there--and I was just one of hundreds using DSLRs there.
quote=photogrl57 Funny thing while researching th... (show quote)


Yes, I too have taken lots of photo's, actually slides, on military bases during shows. There is nothing classified on display there so they don't mind. But I can tell you something that happened to me while I was stationed in Germany, and this is not hearsay, it actually happened to me. My friend and I were on an american Air Base where we had just purchased a new lens for each of our camera's. We went out to the observation area near the runway and was taking a few slides of the aircraft that were coming and going. Then one came out of a hanger and started towards the area where we were. I pointed it out to my friend and told him that I had to have a picture of that one, Put the camera up to my eye and was getting it focused and ready to go, when the camera was gently pushed towards the ground, and a voice says, "You don't want to do that."Naturally the anger had already flared in me and I was just about to give someone a piece of my mind, when I looked to my left and saw the gold oak leafs of a major facing me with his hand still gently on my camera! I said well yes, I really do, Sir, but if you say that I don't, then I won't. He said you may watch, but no photo's. From my memory and the very few pictures that I have seen of a U-2 spyplane, that is what took off that day.
Go to
Dec 25, 2011 13:15:20   #
prestonphoto wrote:
Sam - I agree with you giving the best response and I also agree with janik since you didn't ask permission in the first place. Imagine someone taking pictures of your residence without you knowing why or giving your ok.


I don't know if everyone would be that helpful or not, but the local folk know that I have a great interest in the older prop driven aircraft, and that if I drive by and there is one parked that I will come in and ask if I can get a few pictures of it. I have never been turned down, and they have been most helpful. And yes, I agree that I would not find it to my liking if I went out and found someone taking pictures of my property without asking first.
Go to
Dec 25, 2011 05:12:54   #
Dblunt76 wrote:
I recently visited a small municipal (public) airport and was taking pictures of small planes parked on the ramp. Through a fence I may add. The airport manager approached me and asked me to stop shooting. I do know that you can enter the aircraft's tail number and Google will provide various registration/ownership information. It was no big deal and I did not want to start an argument so I stopped shooting. Was the guy out of bounds and I should have just ignored him?


I have been to the local airport several times with my camera. The first thing that i did however was to go inside and ask if i would be allowed to take some pictures of some of the aircraft that were parked there. A couple were of particular interest to me. Not only was I told yes, they allowed me to go out through the doors onto the asphalt and I did not have to fight the fence and bushes to get a good shot!
Go to
Dec 17, 2011 16:52:33   #
snowbear wrote:
One thing using film does is make you slow down and think about the shot.

Since I can't get the old batteries, the last time I used my Minolta, I took the D40 along to meter.


I still have my original Canon FT-QL that I just love. I bought that camera in the base exchange back in 1967 and it went all over Europe and Turkey with me. Everything works including the light meter. It used the PX-13 mercury battery, which as you say is no longer available, but I have found that a Duracell PX625A, which is alkaline, will work just fine, You just need to change it more often, as the voltage drop off is rather quick over their life, where the mercury cells held their voltage right up to the end of their life before they just died.
Go to
Dec 16, 2011 15:09:26   #
migdalskiy wrote:
60D writes about 5.5Mbyte/sec. Class 10 card "asserts that the card supports 10 MB/s as a minimum non-fragmented sequential write speed", but in real world they don't always sustain 10 Mbyte/sec.

I have a 60D and I bought SanDisk Extreme with "HD Video" and "30 Mb/sec" ratings for $46 (it's more like $20 nowadays) , just to be sure. I could record hour-long clips on this card on many occasions without a hitch.

This is not the cheapest card, but "30 Mb/sec" is a pile of B.S. - capital letters. At best, my copy of this card can sustain 20 Mb/sec, that's somewhat ideal conditions. But it seems to be enough for the 5.5Mbyte/sec throughput that 60D puts it through.

Anyway, just buy an "HD Video" "Extreme" "Pro" with a huge slack in perf (30Mb/s is 5+ times faster than needed) and hope that the morons that rate it didn't overstate the performance by 400%. It's cheap enough these days.
60D writes about 5.5Mbyte/sec. Class 10 card &quo... (show quote)


I guess that in some peoples minds that I waste money, but when I pick up something I want it to work, Period! For that reason when I need a car battery, I get the biggest most powerful one that will fit into the box, Not a cheepo rated for two years, that yes, will start the car under the best of circumstances, but if there is a problem, I guarantee you that it will let you down. So keep buying that memory that works for you, After all it is your money. I, on the other hand will continue to get the best that I can afford, and recommend others to do the same. I haven't been disappointed in doing this, and don't expect too.
Go to
Dec 16, 2011 06:24:28   #
Dria wrote:
I have the 60 D--haven't shot video with it--probably never will...BUT now I will have to try it to see if if works or quits.
OK just tried it. I recorded for 3 minutes. I turned it off.
I have a 16g Sandisk Pro card. where he "class" is is a U with a 1 in it.


I have the T3i, same basic camera, and for sure all class 10 cards are not the same. I purchased the 32 GB Sandisk Extreme Pro, which has a guaranteed write speed of over 90 meg/s, and it does HD video just fine. This card is not cheap, be forewarned! I had to order mine on line, I could not find one localy. Best Buy.com has it for a list price of $165 right now, but on sale for $99. This is what I paid for my card. They are on backorder right now, but you can go ahead and order it at the sale price, and they will ship when it comes in. They will try to get you to change your order to another card, but refuse and wait for it. You will not be sorry. Just playing around the other day and ran off over 8 mins of video. A class 10 PNY 8 GB card came with the camera, but that card only has a write speed of around 15 meg/s, and the camera would take less than a minute of video before the buffer was full and everything came crashing down!
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 18:41:54   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Sam55 wrote:
I have a question that may or may not be related to this, but neverless, here goes. I notice that most, Maybe all new lens do not have the dof lines marked on the lens like all my older Canon lens do. Is this related to "bokeh" , or just the lens maker getting lazy?

With a full manual lens, you can select your DOF to include more foreground or more background. The colored lines helped you achieve this. It is called hyper-focus. Now, the use of an A-F lens dictates 1/3 foreground and 2/3 background, so selective DOF is rarely used.
quote=Sam55 I have a question that may or may not... (show quote)


OK, thanks for that reply, I now realize that my older Canon lens were that, manual lens, fixed focal and not zooms like the newer lens that came with my latest camera, but I had looked at several other lens and noticed that the lines were gone, but now realize that they too were the zooms, with auto focus.
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 14:36:37   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Blah, blah, blah!

I have been selecting my DOF for years, leaving the backgound out of focus so it is not noticeable, so background does not detract from my subject. Now you tell me that I am suddenly artistic because someone adopted the word "bokeh" (which literally traslates to "senile" ), to describe my discareded background. Out-of-focus background (bokeh to the more sensitive) is like a peanut shell: The part you discard and forget, once you have the nut.
Blah, blah, blah! br br I have been selecting m... (show quote)


I have a question that may or may not be related to this, but neverless, here goes. I notice that most, Maybe all new lens do not have the dof lines marked on the lens like all my older Canon lens do. Is this related to "bokeh" , or just the lens maker getting lazy?
Go to
Dec 7, 2011 08:15:55   #
[quote=rivernan][quote=Nikonian72
Personally, I hate the term "bokeh". It was adopted just a few years ago. Matthew Brady must be spinning in hes grave!

me too. What ever happened to depth of field?[/quote]

It lives on with us that got our start some years ago! I absolutely hate change when it is just for the sake of change, and it seems to me that is all this "bokeh" is.
Go to
Dec 6, 2011 06:26:17   #
I have never had but one extended warranty that i felt paid off. That one was on an electric range. I purchased the same camera from BB and declined the extended warranty package.
Go to
Dec 5, 2011 20:17:01   #
USAF 1965-1969 Air Force Communications service, Lindsey Air Force Base, Wiesbaden, Germany. Loved Europe, Then got sent to a remote communications site on a mountain top in Turkey. 1 Year on a mountain top and the winter conditions were considered Artic to say the least. By end of winter had over 14 feet of snow on the ground. Wasn't bad I thought, then in the summer boredom set in, and I realized that there were places you didn't really like. Enlistment ended and I came home to find that Vietnam era vets were not thought very highly of by the folks back home. Booy, what a slap in the face that was, still hurts. I am gald to see that attitude has changed towards present military personel.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.