Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Charles P
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
Sep 30, 2018 14:02:28   #
[quote=toxdoc42]

[You can certainly take a photo without focusing! The 2 functions are totally separate with BBF.[/quote]

That sounds like a good reason not to use it, unless you really want to. It's not for everyone.
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 13:37:36   #
toxdoc42 wrote:
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I did release the focusing from the shutter. I have, unfortunate, ocassionally forgotten to back focus. One of my complaints in the digital age, is That the image in the viewfinder always seems to be in focus, with no reminder to focus. In thr film era, the image was out of focus or the focusing device in the screen made the out of focus obvious. I long for a split image or break up the image to assure me tjatnwhatbi want to be on focus is. Sometimes, if I use single point focus, I can't find the red dot. If I depress the shutter, the red dot is seen. I don't understand what I do wrong that sometimes the red dot moves and then it literally takes 2 hands to get it back to the center.
Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I did release the foc... (show quote)


You should be able to set shutter release to focus priority in the set up menu. Also, if you brush against one of the buttons on the four way controller, it will change the focus point.
Go to
Sep 30, 2018 13:17:28   #
SandraLovesPhotography wrote:
I was hoping you all could help me figure out why the back button focus will not work at times. I am shooting with a Nikon D850 with 85mm lens.In the middle of a shoot, it just won't focus at all. Do you all prefer the back button focus?


I never use BBF, because I can't do it. I have a problem with my right eye which renders it pretty much useless. I tried BBF, but having to use my left eye for the viewfinder makes it problematic. I have my back button set for exposure lock and hold, and that works great for using a gray card, or setting exposure by using green grass or a gray road or anything that is close to 18% gray. The half press on the shutter button works okay most of the time for focus. When shooting landscapes, I go to live view and manual focus at full zoom on something at the hyperfocal distance. This always works well for me.
Go to
Sep 14, 2018 12:41:48   #
cdayton wrote:
And we don’t need any more fake news.


Sorry, but I'm sure a lot of people wish it was fake news. I just thought that because this is a photography site, some might find these photos of interest.
Go to
Sep 14, 2018 11:58:29   #
Deleted
Go to
Sep 14, 2018 11:33:26   #
Sorry, the link didn't work. Finally got it fixed.
https://www.businessinsider.com/hurricane-florence-astronaut-photos-storm-space-2018-9?utm_content=buffer7a28d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=Beach+Facebook
Go to
Sep 13, 2018 13:41:24   #
bobishkan wrote:
Hi Everyone: I have several current Nikon DSLRs and lens and have been caught up in all talk lately about the new mirror less cameras. Then I realized I have a Fuji FinePix S9450W, which I bought years ago refurbished for only $150 and realized that it too is a mirror less. So I started to play with it after sitting in my closet for two years and found it to be fun. It has a wonderful long lens and makes no noise when you take a picture. It has all kinds of features and will do a whole lot of cool but useless things. HOWEVER it has a point and shoot sensor. So my question is, in general, unless I enlarge larger than 8X10, will I notice a big, not slight, difference in my photos. I realize that it will not focus or expose as well as the $5000 new models coming out from Canon and Nikon, but this thing is mirror less and cost me next to nothing. Can I be happy with this mirror less? Bob
Hi Everyone: I have several current Nikon DSLRs an... (show quote)


I have an old Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR. It's 16MP and 1/2.3 sensor. I still get it out and play with it once in a while. It does okay in low light if I use the EXR mode for high ISO low noise, but I only get 8MP images in this mode. As long as I don't crop much or enlarge very big, I'm happy with the results. Back in 2013 when I bought it, it was considered to be a good camera. But with only a 24-720mm zoom lens, it's nothing special today. There are much better super zooms available now. It wasn't all that cheap, but it is mirrorless.
Go to
Sep 13, 2018 13:05:21   #
Here's a copy of an email got on 8/17/18. Just waiting to see if it's on the level.


Dear Shutterbug Subscriber,



As you may be aware by now, Shutterbug is officially shutting down and your final issue was June 2018. However, we couldn’t be more excited to tell you that all of your remaining issues on your Shutterbug subscription will be fulfilled with Outdoor Photographer Magazine, starting with our October issue!



You won’t miss a beat. Discover inspiring locations for your next photo adventure, learn the techniques that pros use to make stunning images and read expert insights on the latest cameras, lenses and accessories with Outdoor Photographer. Whether you enjoy scenic or wildlife photography, if you’re a professional photographer or just a casual nature enthusiast, Outdoor Photographer is designed to cater to a wide variety of readers. If you enjoyed Shutterbug, we think you’ll love Outdoor Photographer.
Go to
Sep 8, 2018 19:17:38   #
jtbdal wrote:
I am a relatively new subscriber to this forum and am beginning to understand why it is called the "Ugly" Hedgehog. Why are there so many jackasses posting on this forum. If you can't say something constructive or nice, why not keep your damn mouth shut. I am tired of all the negativity on this forum, we have enough to deal with in this world as it is. Ok, now I am finished with my venting. Have a great day and great shooting.


A long time ago, before there were all of these internet forums, there was a thing called Use Net. There you could find newsgroups. There was a newsgroup to cover almost anything that one might find interesting. But alas, there was no moderation of these newsgroups at all. We had to grow a really thick skin back then, or just give up and move on. UHH is very mild by comparison. When out in the cow pasture, when I happen upon a large cow pie, I don't step in it. I either step over it or go around it. I've found that I can do the same thing with online forums.
Go to
Sep 7, 2018 19:29:01   #
Pegasus wrote:
I love my little ML-L3. Simple, foolproof.

I was happy to see that it works on my D7500.


I know, it seems kind of ironic that Nikon (who has been so hurt by smart phones) would now make you use one to remotely fire the shutter. Probably saves them a buck or two per camera though.
Go to
Sep 6, 2018 20:17:22   #
wetreed wrote:
I have the Nikon D5300 and really like it. Is the Nikon D5600 worth up grading to? What are the improvements? Would I noticed a difference if I made the upgrade? Thank you for enlightenment that can be offered.


I still use the D5300. I would probably buy a refurbished D5500 if anything happened to mine. I like the infrared release too, and I could learn to live with the touch screen. https://www.cameta.com/Nikon-D5500-Wi-Fi-Digital-SLR-Camera-18-55mm-VR-DX-II-Lens-Black-Factory-Refurbished-89745.cfm
Go to
Sep 3, 2018 17:02:18   #
srt101fan wrote:
You got a lot of comments but not much of it based on your actual question (you asked advice re two options; most responses tried to sell you a third!). More importantly, most of the respondents don't seem to care what type of photography you engage in, what your photographic aspirations are, or what lenses you currently own...welcome to the wild and wooly world of UHH!

Search your soul and wallet before you succumb to your GAS attack. Ask yourself where you're going and why. Carefully check camera features against your needs and budget.

PS - I have a D5300 and am very happy with it. I don't see the need to upgrade to a "pro" level camera when I'm not a pro and don't aspire to be one. I'm more interested in upgrading my photographic skills and the D5300 is just fine for that.
You got a lot of comments but not much of it based... (show quote)


I totally agree with you, srt101fan. I shoot with a D5300, and it's a fine camera with great IQ. About all that the D5500 adds is a touch screen, and I don't need that anyway. But I feel that either of these cameras (or a D5600) would be a good upgrade for the OP and would serve him well.

Cameta Camera gives a full year warranty on refurbished. If they have what you want, it's a good deal.
Go to
Aug 28, 2018 15:01:51   #
safeman wrote:
Weird thoughts come to old people with too much time on their hands.

Should we continue to call ourselves photographers? Photographers record analog images on film, process and print the images creating photographs and if you are a professional sell these little pieces of reality as a source of income. I suggest that we have become collectors and manipulators of electrons. For many, if not most of us, the great majority of our electron collections remain just that--electrons. I sent my last roll of film in for processing and what did I get back, a link to a web site so I could retrieve my electron collections. I have begun thinking of my images stored on my computer as Electron Collections and the prints stored in my photo albums and files as pictures. Electron collections only become images when they are viewed or printed.

Before I change my mind I am going to send this and see what happens
Weird thoughts come to old people with too much ti... (show quote)


I used to think that the word photography should only be used to describe the old chemical processes, and that what most of us are doing now should be considered digital imaging. But having learned that the word photography literally means writing (or painting) with light, I now feel that the word photography can be used for both methods. We're simply using a reusable sensor instead of film for the canvas. So yes, we're still photographers. And I really don't miss all of those stinky chemicals.
Go to
Aug 19, 2018 11:49:00   #
R.G. wrote:
This is my favourite strung-out composition. You can't always get foreground, mid-ground and background into every photo, but when you do it will undeniably add to the sense of depth and distance. As other posted shots have shown, it doesn't have to be precise. As long as it has "stuff" that leads the eye into the farthest part of the scene you have achieved your objective. And there's more than one way to achieve that objective. Natural framing, channels, leading lines, the placement of light or colour - all can be used to lead the viewer off into the distance.

-
This is my favourite strung-out composition. You ... (show quote)


Very nice Photo, R.G.. I like your use of f22 to keep everything in focus. Diffraction be damned! As Bryan Peterson says in his book on composition, it's a case of diffraction vs satisfaction. Good job!
Go to
Aug 18, 2018 20:09:21   #
weedhook wrote:
Hey! Just be thankful that SHUTTERBUG is at least giving you something. My subscription was to run into 2020, and I haven't heard anything from them. I would let them extend my subscription to Outdoor Photographer even though I agree with those who don't think it's all that great a magazine. Now if they could give me a discount on PhotoPlus, that would be nice.


I too have a lot of magazines coming. I renewed for two years and only got 5 issues before they went belly up. But yesterday when I was checking my emails, I went to the junk folder to delete everything. I always take a quick look first, and there was the email from Shutterbug. It states that everyone who has an active subscription will be getting OP starting with the October issue, unless they contact them requesting a refund. Maybe your notice went into your junk folder too! I'm looking forward to checking out OP.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.