Don't waste your money. Instead buy the bridge over Manhatton's East River that I have for sale.

Take it. You can carry what you need each day for given excursion and leave the rest on board. You won't need to take everything each day, but you will always have what you need.

From what you describe, it is probably not just GAS but a real need. I usually take tow and even sometimes three camera bodies each with a lens attached. Dusty, damp and rushed situations do not lend themselves to lens switching. I only started carrying multiple cameras after having trouble changing lenses. Also, if you do this, I would advise using relatively lightweight gear.

Since you are unsure whether or not to add FF, I feel that you don't really have a need to do so. So save the money and enjoy not having to haul more bulk and weight. Myself, and this applies specifically to me, I use both, and each format has its own role. Travel: I go small and light, 4/3. Grandkids Sports: Size and weight are not factors and I have only the very few fast full frame lenses that are most appropriate for the sports they play and where I can sit. I use a Sony a7c for lighter FF weight and usually use a Sigma 50-100 f/1.8 lens (APS, but only vignettes near 50mm and even then very little). If you are into wide angle you can generally get wider lenses for full frame, but an accelerator adapter and one wide FF lens and you will get the width on your 4/3, although my preference pair a Sony a7c with the APS Sony 10-18 which won't vignette from about 12mm and up. In the menu turn off the APS crop option and you will have full frame 12-18 coverage.

As someone once said, "A society that v**es in i***ts is well represented."

We just changed baseball's rule to get the games under three hours and, hopefully, within our attention spans. Would we follow Cricket, a sport where matches can take days?

You effectively have a 27 - 105 and a 27 - 405 plus a 15 - 30. You will definitely want the wide. Between the other two, one may be a bit short but the other is longer than you will probably use and is probably much heavier. If it were me, I'd look for a used 18-140 (27 - 210 equivalent).

They also made a waterproof version called the AW-1 (All-Weather-1). It was good for diving down to about 60 feet or so. There were only two all-weather lenses, one being a moderate zoom. I have one that I still use in absolutely crappy weather. Pics are OK but far from exceptional.

They also made a waterproof version called the AW-1 (All-Weather-1). It was good for diving down to about 60 feet or so. There were only two all-weather lenses, one being a moderate zoom. I have one that I still use in absolutely crappy weather. Pics are OK but far from exceptional.

The ear tags were common in Eastern bloc countries, and are still used in some if not all. The tag color indicates when they got their most recent shots. These dogs are homeless, but lots of people leave food and water out for them. The ones I have seen like people and are friendly, but others were probably put down.

I would take them all, but for the EOS only take one or two lenses depending on what you have. I'd want from wide to medium for excursions and some tele from ship to shore shots. For excursions I'd probably leave the tele on the ship or in the hotel. For more strenuous excursions I'd just carry the RX100. This may mean take the 70D to Scandinavia and only the RX when you go to Peru.

The second one tells the story, partly because it is straightened and mostly because it is cropped. The parts removed in cropping would have distracted rom the subjects. Yes, plural: dual related subjects, the raft and the photographer in the picture.

With crop sensor you definitely need at least 18 on the wide end and I'd also get something that goes wider. The 50 will be redundant in focal length, so I'd leave it home. When you cruise and go into ports you will most likely be moved along quite quickly and not have time to fiddle with many lens changes. You will use the 18-135 almost all of the time, and, if you get one, a wider lens some of the time.

Not only would John never shut up, he was the boss. The two years he held that position were the only years that business did not show any growth (not surprising).

We had ordered. John kept going on and on and the waiter kept trying to help him.