Probably just GAS, but ....
Apr 19, 2023 08:46:04 #
I'm a recreational photographer.
Currently I'm shooting with a Nikon Z-5, I have the following lenses -- Nikon Z 24-200. Sigma 100-400 (I have the Sigma 1.4x tele). Nikon (f mount) 17-35. I use the latter two with an FTZ.
I've begun thinking about a second body, but will be on a budget. Other than GAS, which may be the main reason (If I'm honest), I've found myself in a dusty situations where a lens switch is not feasible. Also, I've planned an eclipse trip next for next year and will want a second body. (Don't want to be fiddling with the solar filter during the critical few pre-totality seconds). I may want a second body for astrophotography -- but this is less critical to the overall decision.
Given my lenses, I'm thinking about a used Nikon D-610 or a D-800. I can find either with relatively low clicks in the $400-500 range from MPB.
With this set up, I can use my Z lens on the Z-5 and either of the other two lenses (without adapter) on the second body.
Thoughts?
Currently I'm shooting with a Nikon Z-5, I have the following lenses -- Nikon Z 24-200. Sigma 100-400 (I have the Sigma 1.4x tele). Nikon (f mount) 17-35. I use the latter two with an FTZ.
I've begun thinking about a second body, but will be on a budget. Other than GAS, which may be the main reason (If I'm honest), I've found myself in a dusty situations where a lens switch is not feasible. Also, I've planned an eclipse trip next for next year and will want a second body. (Don't want to be fiddling with the solar filter during the critical few pre-totality seconds). I may want a second body for astrophotography -- but this is less critical to the overall decision.
Given my lenses, I'm thinking about a used Nikon D-610 or a D-800. I can find either with relatively low clicks in the $400-500 range from MPB.
With this set up, I can use my Z lens on the Z-5 and either of the other two lenses (without adapter) on the second body.
Thoughts?
Apr 19, 2023 09:49:50 #
Drove 800 miles to see the last one, this next one (April 8, 2024) the center of totality goes right over my patio here in Rochester. Just hope it is as clear as the one we witnessed in south Illinois a few years back...
Apr 19, 2023 09:51:24 #
KenProspero wrote:
I'm a recreational photographer. br br Currently ... (show quote)
Just curious, where do you plan to go to photograph it?
Apr 19, 2023 10:19:06 #
KenProspero wrote:
I'm a recreational photographer. br br Currently ... (show quote)
Sounds like a plan. Go for it.
Id suggest the 610 over the 800
(but thaz just a minor detail).
Apr 19, 2023 10:23:20 #
From what you describe, it is probably not just GAS but a real need. I usually take tow and even sometimes three camera bodies each with a lens attached. Dusty, damp and rushed situations do not lend themselves to lens switching. I only started carrying multiple cameras after having trouble changing lenses. Also, if you do this, I would advise using relatively lightweight gear.
Apr 19, 2023 10:27:03 #
User ID wrote:
Sounds like a plan. Go for it.
Id suggest the 610 over the 800
(but thaz just a minor detail).
Id suggest the 610 over the 800
(but thaz just a minor detail).
Why would you recommend the 610 over the 800? The 800 is the newer of the two.
Apr 19, 2023 10:51:18 #
rcarol wrote:
Why would you recommend the 610 over the 800? The 800 is the newer of the two.
You ask a question based on false "info".
Therefor no answer needed, especially concerning such a minor detail.
Apr 19, 2023 11:05:59 #
ELNikkor wrote:
Just curious, where do you plan to go to photograph it?
Valley Mills, Texas, Near Waco.
We were in Glendo, Wyoming for the last one. Here's a pic from that shoot.
Apr 19, 2023 11:10:18 #
[quote=User ID]You ask a question based on false "info".
Therefor no answer needed, especially concerning such a minor detail.[/quot
I don’t understand your comment.
Therefor no answer needed, especially concerning such a minor detail.[/quot
I don’t understand your comment.
Apr 20, 2023 00:30:45 #
rcarol wrote:
I don’t understand your comment.
User ID wrote:
You ask a question based on false "info".
Therefor no answer needed, especially concerning such a minor detail.
Therefor no answer needed, especially concerning such a minor detail.
I don’t understand your comment.
The 600 and 800 were recalled. The 610 and 810 are their replacements. Usually, a replacement would be newer than that which it replaces. FWIW, the 600 and the 800 are essentially fraternal twins.
Therefor I was at a loss to explain why I was recommending the "older camera", given that it is not actually older. IOW, there can be no answer to your question of "why" cuz it derives from a false idea.
Apr 20, 2023 07:10:50 #
tcthome
Loc: NJ
rcarol wrote:
Why would you recommend the 610 over the 800? The 800 is the newer of the two.
No expert here but (actually, I have only taken a handfull of night photos) but isin't the lower pixel camer a better choice for Astro/ night sky/noise photography? Curious.
Apr 20, 2023 07:55:52 #
larryepage
Loc: North Texas area
tcthome wrote:
No expert here but (actually, I have only taken a handfull of night photos) but isin't the lower pixel camer a better choice for Astro/ night sky/noise photography? Curious.
Actually no. Night photography is actually one place where higher pixel count is of real advantage. The D800 will do a better job of resolving individual stars.
Actually, I would suggest a D810 over a D800 right now, because if there turns out to be a problem with the camera, NikonUSA will repair the D810. Support has ended for the D800.
I understand the OP's budget constraints, but I've used both the D810 and the D850 for night sky photography. While both are fine for this, the D850 has almost an extra stop of usable sensitivity. This can be really important when trying to avoid star movement in photographs. And I respectfully disagree with USERID's recommendation of a D600 (or D610). I've never seen one at any of the group night shooting workshops I've attended. I owned one for a short time, and expect that it would be really awkward to operate in the dark.
Apr 20, 2023 08:18:19 #
KenProspero wrote:
I'm a recreational photographer. br br Currently ... (show quote)
I have been shooting two or three bodies for a decade. I find it really useful to have a second body with a different lens.
My focus is events, so the advantage is having the right lens on a body when it's needed without the 30 seconds it takes to find the lens juggle the new and old lenses while changing, and return the old lens to the bag, all of which happens while the shot is evaporating. (Three hands help, since I don't use a neck strap: I hold the camera bare. The neck strap gets in the way when using multiple bodies).
I don't do astrophotography and I haven't done a solar eclipse since the '60s so I'm of no help there. But if you do any family events, two bodies (with different lenses) will be a plus. The only drawback is you have to have a convenient bag with the second body/lens with you at all times.
Another consideration is that if you use two bodies people will think you're a pro and will ask you to do other events.
Apr 20, 2023 08:27:23 #
I also am in a dusty place , yet change lenses daily , I have posted repeatedly a way to totally remove dust , but yet no taker . [ mini shop vac ] .
Apr 20, 2023 10:15:27 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.