Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dsmeltz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 ... 630 next>>
Dec 1, 2014 10:57:33   #
Cafe Du Monde. The whole area for a few blocks in any direction around the cafe is a photo op. Rememeber to keep the lens cap on and otherwise protect your gear when eating a beignet. The sugar can go everywhere. And you MUST eat them with the sugar.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 10:51:20   #
Canon Power Shot SX50 or the Panasonic Lumix FZ 200. They will both do the job. I lean toward the Canon for the stated use due to zoom and lower noise.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 10:43:40   #
Clearly the 7DII can take landscape shots. However, it has been designed to excel at action. A Corvette may be built to excel at runnig down the highway at high speed, but is still looks great at 10mph pulling up to the front of your house.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 09:57:10   #
The "best" is sooo situational. It all dependes on what you are shooting, under what conditions, how you relate to a camera body, etc...

Further the focus on one asspect, like "sharpest" or "IQ" or "sensor" just misses the whloe idea of photography being about balancing many different elements so that no one element is constantly supreme.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 09:51:37   #
Dapopmitch wrote:
I have a Nikon d100 with a nikon 24-120 1:3.5-5.6G lens. I really like the canon offerings but wondering if I should just upgrade the nikon body (which one...7100 or other?) and add to the Nikon lens collection. Just an amateur family picture taker wanting better quality photos! Help?!


Depends on your budget. I assume you got the lens with the camera so we are talking about the nikon 24-120 1:3.5-5.6G that sells between $300-500.

If you stick with Nikon, you are up and running under $1000. The D7100 can be had for less than $900. To go Canon with a lens you will be looking at twice that. You would be buying in to a better line of lenses. But not neccessarily for what you are shooting.

I would stick with Nikon in your case.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 09:21:02   #
If you have a lot of APS-C lenses and plan to get rid of your old 7D, the 7DII would be a good choice. If you have the lenses and plan on keeping the old 7D, get the 6 or used 5DII. If you have been buying FF lenses all along, the 5DII.

Do you have a budget? What lenses do you have? What are you going to keep or sell?
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 08:47:16   #
tainkc wrote:
I have another idea if you do not mind. Since we in western culture have our eyes travel from left to right, try flipping horizontally 180 degrees. It will have a more natural flow to it and I bet the negative space will have a more relaxing feel to it.

Just a thought.

Tom



On the other hand, that would remove a lot of the tension that exists in the shot. Even a baby dreams. As is, we wonder what the dream is. If you reduce the tension by flipping, then it may become too peaceful and lose viewer interest.

But try it and see. The left right thing is valid in the west and is used a lot in film and theater to create excitement for an entrance or to slip something on stage without attracting attention.
Go to
Dec 1, 2014 08:41:16   #
It works. You could have gone further. You have almost the whole head in the frame. I think you could have cropped a little more of the head out keeping all of the negative space. Maybe pushing the eyes closer to 1/3 from the right instead of the temple.
Go to
Nov 27, 2014 09:08:59   #
What camera (FF, 3/4, APS-C...) and lens did you use? (I know I could just check the image data, but I am on my kindle right now) I ask for the educational value. It is a very nice shot!
Go to
Nov 27, 2014 09:03:46   #
dinosaur39 wrote:
If I had Ernest Hemingway's typewriter, could I write the Sun Also Rises?


Depends, is it an open book test? :lol:
Go to
Nov 27, 2014 09:02:20   #
lighthouse wrote:
You don't want the next step.
You want the best step that you can afford.


Almost agree. You want the best step for the kind of photography you shoot that you can afford.
Go to
Nov 27, 2014 08:54:22   #
You are on an APS-C, so an ultra-wide lens is a good idea. A 10-20 or 10-24 would be great.
Go to
Nov 27, 2014 08:34:46   #
LFingar wrote:
Your choice, obviously. To me it's no burden. Just lines of code in the software. Something I will never see and something that makes no difference in the performance of the camera. Five of my last six cameras claimed to be capable of taking video. Couldn't prove it by me. I never used the feature on any of them. It's a pretty safe bet that whatever camera or cameras you have that there are features you don't use and never will use. Why limit yourself in what you buy simply because of another unused feature? Look around at all the products with computer chips in them, which is an ever growing list, and see how many have features you will never use. If things like that bother you then you must have a very short list of things you will buy. I share your dislike of tools that are compromised by a multi-function design, but that is not the case in cameras, or most other electronics.
Your choice, obviously. To me it's no burden. Just... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Nov 25, 2014 14:05:31   #
Did you also shoot this in RAW? There are a couple spots up at 11 o'clock you need to fix. But the composition is lovely.
Go to
Nov 25, 2014 13:57:56   #
Personally, when I look for a camera, I am unlikely to look for one with a criteria of does not do video. I usually start with a list of things I want the camera to do.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 ... 630 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.