frankraney wrote:
...The B500 on the link is cheap and has an optical viewfinder.
You may want to check again. The B500 doesn't have a viewfinder at all -- optical or electronic.
Another alternative is to find a used one from a reputable reseller, such as this Canon G10 from Robert's Camera for $101.
Bipod wrote:
... For bright sunlight, I fell back to using the Kodak Easyshare DX4530 from 2003,
Miraculously, it still worked. It works today--but suddenly only on fresh
alkaline batteries.
I would consider EVF, but the one's I've seen are expensive and battery killers:
they require an expensive Li-Ion battery pack that doesn't last any longer than the
AAs in the Kodak did. I already own a laptop.
Unfortunately the market has chosen to go a different direction, but ...
There might be another approach in your case. The director of the "Santa Fe Photographic Workshops" gave a talk a few years ago at our local camera club and he described, as part of the talk, how he came up with a novel (to me) idea. He taught himself to "hip shoot" his camera. He taught himself to be able to eye-ball the field of view and point his camera while holding it at chest level so that he could take pictures without ever looking at the camera. It took practice, but he eventually got very good at it.
Bipod wrote:
My last optical viewfinder P&S digital camera just died
I need to shoot in bright sunlight (high desert). The camera needs to be inexpensive
because it gets left in the car, taken backpacking and tent camping, etc.
...
Are you married to optical viewfinders? Why won't an EVF work for you?
Cavik wrote:
... First... I am currently learning about using an 18% gray card for determining correct exposure and I think I understand that this card is 50% black and 50% white mix which makes a great color for setting an exposure so that the histogram can be centered but why is it called an 18% gray if it is right in the middle between white and black? ...
I think earlier responses more-or-less answered this, but I'll add that you need to remember we see light logarithmically, not linearly, and as pointed out, 18% gray means 18% white, not 50%, so:
18% : 0 stop - middle point
36% : +1 stop
72% : +2 stops
100% : +2 1/2 stops
and going down:
18% : 0 stop - middle point
9% : -1 stop
4.5% : -2 stops
2.25% : -3 stops
So if you look at it as 'stops' rather than as a linear scale, 18% is pretty close to the middle of the brightness perception scale with about 2 1/2 to 3 stops on each side.
[As I understand it, originally the middle gray cards were closer to something like 12.9% which would have centered it a little better, but somewhere, and maybe someone here knows the history of why, the middle gray "convention" got pushed up to 18%.]
Does that clear up the mystery a little?
pshane wrote:
... The Third, is an Epson Stylus R-2000, (another$600.00), is also not wanting to print the Blue Ink after sitting for a couple of months.
So, - Does anyone know of a solution for #3 before it's too late? ...
I also have a R2000 and have had to deal with clogged heads a few times. It's not hard to deal with.
Turn on the printer then pull the power cord so the head is not locked and move it away from the parking area. Fold up a paper towel to dimensions of the parking area, then spray it with Windex to make it fairly moist. Position the soaked towel in the parking area and push the head so it sits over the towel and let it sit for 10 or 15 minutes. Move the head away and the towel should be saturated with ink. Remove it and throw it away. Repeat a few more times with fresh paper towels. Try printing at this point. If it's still clogged, repeat the towel exercise above.
It works pretty well, and you'll get some idea of how much excess ink gets thrown around. You'll likely appreciate that it was probably a good thing to got through this cleaning even if it weren't clogged.
CindyHouk wrote:
Looking into purchasing a remote shutter release for the Nikon D500 -- which one do you use and why?
If you are only looking for a finger-press remote, I agree completely with MT Shooter that the RFN-4s at Amazon is the way to go. It's reliable, small and most importantly doesn't need the hotshoe which is almost always holding a flash or flash controller when I want to use the remote.
scg3 wrote:
... but what I've heard about the Godox AD200 makes me wonder if it might be the wiser choice ....
I've been using Godox flashes and strobes for several years now, and love them from the little TT350 up to the AD600s. I have two V860IIs that I like a lot and use quite often, but to me this is a no-brainer. For your situation, absolutely the AD200s. They have more power and flexibility in roughly the same footprint. The only drawback I can think of is that it uses a different battery than the V8xx series in case you planned on using both.
jim quist wrote:
... The light seems a little dim ...
If you want more light, remove the grid. If you have an extra diffusion sheet inside, remove that too.
cbtsam wrote:
... Now, when I select the mirror up shooting option as before, the camera shoots with one depression of my mc-30 cable release. I'm pretty clear I'm doing something wrong, but I just cannot figure out what it is.
Does it work as expected if you press the shutter button directly rather than using the mc-30 cable release?
If you're a Canon shooter, did you consider the EOS R?
jerryc41 wrote:
I don't think there is any way to clean this up, but I thought I'd ask, anyway. A songbook has quite a few photocopied pages with a lot of gray in them. Is there a way to get rid of the gray?
I must not understand your question. Is this a simple problem of just raising the contrast? Just go into levels, raise the black point to make the black ink solid, drop the white point to turn all the gray white, and adjust the mid point to taste. Or do the same with curves, or brightness and contrast. If you want to further bring out the text, sharpen it.
This is just too simple, so I must not understand what you are asking.
Not a big deal, but just so you know,
Gene E. Balch wrote:
... It has the APS-C sensor,
It has a 1" sensor which is smaller than an APS-C sensor. Smaller even than a 4/3rds sensor. That is, BTW, why it is called Nikon
1.
Quote:
so the 10-100mm lens equates to about a 47-270mm in 35mm.
The 1" sensor has a 2.7 crop factor, so a 10-100mm lens has a 35mm equivalent of a 27-270mm. (The APS-C crop factor is 1.5) [I guess the 4 in 47 was a typo]
IDguy wrote:
D5600 takes same images as D7200 and has much better features such as fully articulated touch screen, touchscreen control vs. random unlighed buttons and unreadable green screen, and Snapbridge. Plus it weighs and (refurbished) costs about one half.
Things like focus and ergonomics are important to me, and I would guess to others.
I recommend sticking with your A6000 until you are can justify an intermediate level DSLR such as the Nikon D7200 or Canon 80D. Entry level DSLRs are missing important features such as focus fine tune.
Consider buying used. The price of a used or refurbished D7200 is close to the price of a new D5600, but the D7200 is a *much* better camera. You might even find a used or refurbished D7100 for even more savings.