usnret wrote:
Thinking about going for a ride on a narrow gauge train in Durango, Colorado in late May. Wondering if anyone here has "been there done that" ? Any do's or don'ts advice would be much appreciated!
2012, in Ushuaia for a Cape Horn rounding trip. It took 40 hours traveling from door to hotel, and waiting for a third fellow to show up who missed his flight out of Buenos Aires. We watch his plane come in down the Beagle Channel from the hotel room, and drive over to the airport to pick him up. What to do?
Gary and Bill are both train enthusiasts, so I propose The Train At The End Of The World, narrow gauge, about 10 miles west of town, and we order box lunches. Total win.
I saw that the great blue herons were back for the season, but they weren’t really active yesterday at 4:30. Instead, I saw that the neighborhood osprey are back.
Z7ii, 200-500@500.
wdross wrote:
I find the easiest way for me to talk "equivalent" is to reference the angle of view. The angle of view (4.1°) for my 300mm 4/3rds lens is the same angle of view (4.1°) as the Sony, Canon, Nikon, and any other full frame lens of 600mm. And f4 is f4 for any lens of any format. But depth of field for the f4 will change between formats if keeping the angle of view and aperture the same. For me shooting wildlife, more depth of field is desirable, especially if shooting moving wildlife. Plus I can handhold the 300, 1.4X or 2X teleconverter, and body with no need of a tripod. This is where I feel my 4/3rds provides me an advantage. This is where the word "equivalent" has the most meaning for me.
I find the easiest way for me to talk "equiva... (
show quote)
Bingo! Then all you need is a reference, something like a standard field of view on a 24 x 36 mm piece of film is 43 degrees (I made that up) using a 50 mm lens.
Great lessons in ‘seeing’ and framing.
jerryc41 wrote:
I don't know if this is something new, but you can become a Walmart Member for just $98 a year. Why would you want to do that? You could save $1,300 a year! I don't have the details, and I'm not interested enough to look.
The word is ‘velleity’, meaning concerned or interested, but not enough to actually do something.
A month after I retired, my employer sent me an unexpected bonus check that I used to buy the 200-500. I love this lens, but I need to drive even the half mile around the corner to lug the tripod and related gear.
Even then, many of my shots are tethered. I try to end the day with some handheld shots.
I’ll bring the beast to Maine for our annual trip, along with the other gear. The Z100-400 is on my short list.
Nice set. Really like the boobies and iguanas on the reef.
I was close to doing a trip there in June, but they were shy one berth on the boat.
What did you find to be your most useful gear?
BebuLamar wrote:
except if it was the 737 max when it thinks it's going to stall it would push the nose down and crash.
Several months after this, one of my junior engineers wanted to know what happened. I’d read at most two articles on this, but never saw what should have been done to prevent this. They were top tier articles by people who should know, not crap articles by the new ‘experts’.
Way back, when Boeing proposed a semi-autonomous trim system, there should have been a line in a certification document called the Functional Hazard Analysis that said erroneous and undetected trim failure is potentially catastrophic.
That alone should have triggered a series of design discussions centered around ‘give me a system with sufficient detection, reporting, and robustness to keep this from happening’.
Hint #1: reliability requirement is less than 1 per billion flight hours; show me the analysis that demonstrates that
Hint #2: you can’t get there with a single AoA sensor, the primary sensor to drive the system
My experience is that the weak link in systems with potentially catastrophic results is the baseline electrical power system, but that’s another discussion. The MAX scenario is frighteningly similar to that little sub that imploded near the Titanic, but with people who really should have known better.
chrissybabe wrote:
Regardless of who did what in the actual plane the last part about reporters not getting the facts straight is probably more correct than anything. Why a reporter, who most likely did 'soft' subjects at school, thinks that they can apply their 'knowledge' to any technical subject especially when their 'facts' came from some sort of media person (same background) and expect us to believe anything they write is beyond me.
I’ve done a bit of aviation accident investigation in my past, and get a serious chuckle when I read the local paper reports of what happened.
Years ago, one of our investigators was playing volleyball on the beach one summer evening when one of our aircraft made an emergency landing nearby. We’d often joke that the man in the street answer was ‘it was like boom boom, then a fire, then it crashed’…because that’s how airplanes crash. We agreed that he missed the opportunity to say ‘I thought it was an atom bomb’.
Another time, we were at a farewell party for one of our coworkers and his phone rings. It was his mother telling him to check the news because there was a crash and it was televised. We walked into the bar to see the news on CNN. So the short answer to ‘how do investigators find out about a crash?’, is that their mother calls them.
https://www.apexpharm.com/lift-chairs
Apex Pharmacy is near me in Connecticut, but they have an amazing setup for pretty much everything you might want from a pharmacy, including a lift chair section. Take a look, make a call. The staff is knowledgeable and helpful.
jerryc41 wrote:
If I charge $600/month for three months, Citibank will give me $11/month credit, for a total of $33. Somehow, that's not a very tempting offer.
It’s ok if you were going to spend that money anyway…and pay in full at the end of the month.
BebuLamar wrote:
I always thought the "Triangle" was invented in the 21st century but many people said it has been around forever. I wouldn't doubt Adams skill in exposure but I am sure he knew no triangle.
Looking through old stuff and I have my Kodak photo guide (vintage early 1970s) which includes a wheel to evaluate exposure value (EV). You can see how changing aperture, shutter, and film ISO (ASA in those days) affected exposure.
So yes…the triangle was around, just by a different name. It just wasn’t so easy to change your film mid-roll, so only the pros in the field did that.
Your key choices were to increase shutter speed and kill DOF, or decrease shutter speed and use a tripod.
Linda From Maine wrote:
You lost me at 24. What is that number?
4 weeks per month. Should be 26 weeks, or 93+/- games per week.