Posts for: washy
Feb 24, 2016 22:21:49 #
Old Timer wrote:
I have opportunity to buy one with less than 7500 ... (show quote)
I had the GAS for a 7dmk2 when I already had a 60D, life is to short, go for it. The extra focusing points are well worth it, sell the 60D if you don't want too many bodies . Enjoy
Feb 23, 2016 00:36:00 #
Opal wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has used the Tamron AF 1... (show quote)
I had the Tamron 18-270 3.5-6.3 , at times I thought the lens worked well and I managed some good results with it, very sharp, lots of detail etc and other times I thought it was not so good. I used it for shooting some landscapes at F11 and it performed well, with low shutter speeds on a tripod but hand held at 6.3 for other subjects and faster shutter speeds it appeared to work not so well. For a lightweight travel lens it was very good. It was used on various Canon bodies. Hope this helps. Washy
Jan 12, 2016 02:46:06 #
I find the videos on you tube to be worth watching especially those with Canon backing.
Jan 12, 2016 02:39:33 #
Jlgad wrote:
I want either a (Tamron 150-600mm or Nikon 200-500... (show quote)
This image was taken on a sunny day with a Canon 60D and the Tamron 150-600 at a distance of about 60 yards with me lying on my belly hand holding the camera. I think you pay your money you take your pick and sometimes you may get a really sharp lens from any of these mentioned and sometimes you don't. What I think is important that you get the lens tuned to your camera body and if your images are soft take the lens to your dealer and get him to check the focus.
Dec 22, 2015 13:03:31 #
What lens were you using ? With the 7d mk2 ?
Dec 22, 2015 12:54:42 #
The focusing system on the Canon 7d mk 2 is just stunning, I got mine last week. Only one problem, I am getting too many keepers, going to need more external hard drive space. gereat images of the Waxwing
Aug 30, 2015 10:59:34 #
I forgot to mention when you custom profile your papers all the other profiles are not used including the printers own colour management
Aug 30, 2015 10:57:00 #
one way of getting your printer to print correct colours is to as has been mentioned before, calibrate your screen with a Spyder or Colormonki, the spyder I am told if far better than a color monki. Then get your printer custom profiled to match both your ink and the paper you print on. Each different paper will have its own profile. I use different papers for what different image I print. The custom profiles are free normally from your paper supplier. I use www.fotospeed.com the results are amazing. I used to have the same problem you have but no longer. Both my screens are spydered and my lap top as well. I'm sure you will have a paper supplier in the US than can icc profile your printer.
Aug 23, 2015 03:19:41 #
You will find your Canon printers use less ink, if you have profiles made to suit the ink and the different papers. They are free from paper companies. The profile tells the printer how much ink to lay down on the various different papers, resulting in ink saving and far better images. I understand that profiles work for Epsom printers too.
Aug 13, 2015 17:13:03 #
I like them both but they look a bit HDR ish or too much saturation
Jul 27, 2015 17:26:12 #
g-man wrote:
HP pavilion, windows 8.1, 2tb HD WITH 2tb external HD.. When it goes to update I get a screen that says cannot connect to Adobe, check my connection and firewall. Of coarse I did. Also launching the CC App I have no access to my apps. PS and LR both still work on my computer but I can't update or launch anything fron Cc App. It's a known issue, it's all over the web with remedy solutions.
I have a similar problem. Adobe cc has an update, when I try to update across comes the message "cannot upload" .after three times trying I have given up. CC2015 working fine as it is
Jul 18, 2015 23:10:01 #
Gifted One wrote:
This was a used camera. Warranties are not usely done on resold merchandise. They truly went above and beyond. I would have a hard time with this.
J. R.
J. R.
Correct but as the camera was only a few months old, with so little use, they repaired it for free.
Jul 18, 2015 14:18:07 #
gemlenz wrote:
As I understand it from Canon, you must have the original receipt AND warranty card to get the warranty. They said they do not accept warranty if product was resold. Have you ever tried to have it repaired by Canon?
I bought a Canon 60D from a polish chap, his mother gave it to him for a birthday present. So I believe it was a Polish model, any way a fault occurred and Canon UK wanted to charge me for the repair, as although only 9 months old with less than 100 shutter count(obtained from the battery info, as the charger was still wrapped. I wrote to the managing director, result camera repaired and returned in 3 days at no cost. Way to Go Canon
Jul 15, 2015 01:23:42 #
Mark7829 wrote:
You ruined the image when you over sharpened in Lightroom. There is a white outline around the legs and the neck is just gross. Come on you're trolling us right? You really are making a joke of the lens right? I get it. lololol
So funny - thanks for sharing.
So funny - thanks for sharing.
Just proving your wrong along with all the crap you been mouthing, and now like every one else I'm leaving you to your own unsatisfactory life. After all your only on here to upset folks, in fact I think your are JR1 who supposedly came from Cornwall. Go get your eyes tested and a shovel for your mouth.
Jul 15, 2015 00:57:02 #
Mark7829 wrote:
Nah... the labs report lack of sharpness at 600 mm for this lens. To say it is the same at 400 as Nikon or Canon misses the point. This not a 400 mm lens it is a 600 and that is why people buy it. It is also at f6.3 necessitating a higher ISO and longer shutter sped than a f/4 in low light. It also limits your ability to add a TC. It is cheaper but that's about it. Go for it but it is no way equivalent to Nikon on Canon. though many like yourself will try to make that argument.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Tamron 150-600 from about 150 yards away, sharp enough?
