Since you want a comment, here is one:

The cats are out of wack compared to each other. One seems to be a kitten, the other an adult. The issues:
- No proportion is kept
- Head is way smaller as an adult, despite the kitten being placed behind the adult
- Adult is small compared to the younger version (see head size comment)
- Adult has closed cornea indicating bright lights, the kitten on the other hand indicates low light conditions.

Composite errors:
- Light sources do not match
 - Front right for the cats and high
 - Front right on the woman but also reaches the left side of the dress, revealing details
- All subjects are floating
- Depth of field, sharpness is different cats have extreme details and rest is soft.
 - The female model does not fit the scene. It seems that she is meant as a goddess, princess or sorceress of some sort but represented as mundane. (Clothing and headgear clues)
- Repeated pattern between the cats and the model.
- All objects are floating (composite error)

The title does not reflect the image content. There is no potential conflict or disagreement in the image offered. Your scene is not a desert, but an arid area where only hardy plants thrive. I have been in deserts and trust me there are no plants, just seeds: plants grow and die in a sort period of time. There are no trees, grass or cactus, just sand or stones unless it is an oasis.

Personal appreciation:
I do not like the bleak aspect of this work. I have noted that every time you offer something, this mood seems to be dominant.

Personal note, to you:
You seem to have a heavy chip on your shoulder on many threads and comments, it does not matter where you post.
This comment is a critical analysis of your work using both an AI creation and a composite of your images.
When I look at an image, I look at the 'Wow!', not the details, as I did here. I do not comment when something leaves me cold or is repetitive.