bob7fred wrote:
As a realist painter, with oils, I would agree. I may paint from a photo, but things are changed and not necessarily as in the photo. But then Ansel didn’t have PhotoShop, or Paint Shop, or other programs that change sky and background, and remove objects, and place objects. Then a diddled picture ca be printed in high rez on good photo paper, and displayed as a photograph. So, in Ansel’s time, that was true. Today, not so much.
True, Ansel Adams didn't have photoshop, but he was a grandmaster in the darkroom where he spent more time than he did in the field. Since most of his work was in black and white (at least the more famous prints), he could do an incredible job of altering the relationship between the subject and the sky and/or background (although, sometimes those were the subject). Be aware that objects can be removed in darkroom processing.