Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: skingfong
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 25 next>>
Aug 26, 2019 17:07:10   #
Bill Thrill wrote:
Hellohttps://sports.yahoo.com/troy-aikman-doug-gottlieb-tweet-andrew-luck-044734193.html, I own a canon sis rebel T7 and would like to know what the best all in one daily driver Lense would be. I only want to carry around one Lense and I have a budget of around $175. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks!


Canon 28-135 used would be a great budget lens. Here's a used one

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Canon-28-135mm-F-3-5-5-6-IS-Macro-USM-EF-Mount-Lens-72/372744595334?epid=99760288&_trkparms=ispr%3D1&hash=item56c94f2786:g:s6gAAOSw6uVdXXk3&enc=AQAEAAAB4BPxNw%2BVj6nta7CKEs3N0qVDXaOG4bO6EeyV8QIRlic3RGR1NMSUcgEL%2FIJXGT8bOruDFmgEcBqEUVk9lcMubu8Outx4lMZC1Vsq7OCM9eLIfvQGabADb0AR63FOGlT%2Begzke6lsJlV8pAPF3X3K4HyHcjps7QNnc9gk8Uh5ic9RCiuk2XX31vsQe54oA16W%2FXfn07XxA6hQAhfu7xi4duon0LLlt8CCz34%2BICvlabvx292%2BrEqwBIITJQ%2FmKGpNvMpnXzkpnIH6ncV9PVtALaPYf3Y4NZxnuKjYfkZH9FzrnkfSa0cSv0Zfo89usaMv0o3hX2CRFcHIc2JPwPegw7Cni%2Flp%2BPGb4FwUwqs0s4rKdq8IaDHgtMfMe4Z92QI4kvF0kyB%2F8wslWafkx%2FRLDU7kpZGJsJ29iccQ9%2B8MwUeJo%2BDVdUy5dd6nUTGZ7%2BmjWfKZFZgSGe5dNRG9a5b1UcA5l%2BHwXnoKApXEtZ9wLEBCafCSEO%2BQnFvCd97OKS4bQ%2BRFevMHWPh9I%2BQ3pGJaLvEV2DyslsU73Fgyy9Z64zW2IwR5LjCbgiN20jD3oCrGGA%2Ftlea3RvWAxlLlNFMV0cYiksix8WuKDoEX2H8vPXYa%2B8ttlzU6m5Y7K%2BBFZnz6lA%3D%3D&checksum=372744595334428e7e3beb854888b7fdaf677443d4f0
Go to
Aug 10, 2019 17:25:29   #
Longshadow wrote:
I usually never question if a photo depicts reality or not, I simply look at a photo and either like it or not.
If I like it, I'll probably look at the elements in the image. If I don't care for it, I'll move on.
For me they stand, or fall, on their own merit. I don't care if someone beefed up or toned down the saturation, contrast, or highlights in a sunset, who am I to say it was not REALLY how it looked. Only the photographer knows that, and I don't care. I'm looking at the attractiveness of the image, not whether it was real. Not if it looks like it might not be real, I might wonder, but I'll still look at the image, its content, and arrangement.
I usually never question if a photo depicts realit... (show quote)


Go to
Aug 10, 2019 17:09:51   #
Drbobcameraguy wrote:
Good evening fellow Hoggers. I am having trouble with something. The something is editing. I'm a newbie to photography not to software. My problem is I can edit ANY photo to be perfect. By using focus stacking inserting objects from other photos cloning the list goes on. Is there somewhere that editing is limited or non existent. Are there enough people here who may have an interest in a area for unedited photos? I understand the line between lightly edited and IMHO created is a sticking point. That said how about ZERO EDITING. Just a thought from a person who has shot for a year and have been hell bent on taking great photos not making them. I hope no one thinks I'm bashing highly edited photos. They are amazingly beautiful. I just would rather be taking photographs instead of sitting in front of my computer. All opinions are respected. Let's hear from everyone. Thank you all for all the information you all post and especially the photos. Thanks again Bob
Good evening fellow Hoggers. I am having trouble w... (show quote)


When I first started, I use to think I'd rather be shooting than editing too. But as I became more proficient at editing and more aware of things I saw in the image, I realized I can make a better jpg than the camera can by editing the raw file. I shoot Raw + jpg. A lot of times I see a jpg could've been done better by me than the camera. I don't edit every single shot, but my favorites and jpgs that could use some help. Shooting and editing go hand in hand. There's nothing wrong with having a little icing on the cake you just baked. That's the way I see it.
Go to
May 10, 2019 03:52:07   #
hobbit123 wrote:
Well it can't be that obvious because I have lots of experience with surround sound :-). I started off with a NAD 5.1 system at least eighteen years ago and now run a Yamaha 7.1 system. I don't dispute that it sounds great, my beef is that the media currently available doesn't utilise it. When I first installed it every DVD that came out included LFE for example but I haven't watched a DVD for at least ten years and I don't think Netflix includes surround sound (does it?).

My current TV is a Panasonic Plasma. When I bought it my purchase was based on the fact that it was the best picture 'that' amount of money could buy. This was when LCD TVs were starting to flood the market. The picture is still very good even by today's standards (though probably not yours :-).

My other comment would be that watching something on a screen is more about the story than the quality of the output (if it's within reason) "for most people". I doubt the average viewer sits in front of his/her TV all night marvelling at the quality. That would last about five minutes, if that.
Well it can't be that obvious because I have lots ... (show quote)


I use to have a Panasonic Plasma also. It was the best TV for the time and still is a great TV. Wait until you see a 4K OLED displaying HDR or Dolby Vision content.

I marvel at quality a lot. In a way, it's kind of a curse, but a curse I enjoy. I can't help it, I'm an enthusiast.
Go to
Mar 3, 2019 13:14:18   #
rjaywallace wrote:
My list would contain photographers to shadow from the hallowed halls of UHH itself.
No less respected tho they are not famous.

CooledgeR
GoofyNewfie
Linda Harlow
RichardTaylor
rmalarz
robertjerl
sailorsmom
suntouched
tpatz


Gene 51 and Graham Smith should also be on this list.

Gene 51 does great work and is very knowledgeable in the technical aspects.

Graham Smith is a great story teller with his photos.
Go to
Jan 12, 2019 16:42:40   #
Elmerviking wrote:
But what about it when you have set auto minimum Shutter-Speed (when the camera set minimum speed according to focal length).
What do you do then??
I believe this is a default setting, but not sure without checking.


The OP said he was using aperture priority mode with a 2 second exposure. You can't select a minimum shutter speed without raising the ISO in aperture priority mode. I can't imagine why a shutter speed be set to a minimum on a tripod unless you need to freeze action. If action needs to be frozen, I'd use shutter priority or Manual with Auto ISO.
Go to
Jan 12, 2019 16:18:21   #
rbmitch123 wrote:
In taking a long exposure photo, say 2 seconds, would you ever keep your camera on auto ISO? Most cases I am shooting with Aperture priory and Auto ISO. For this discussion I would be shooting a landscape photo at dusk or in the dark.


Assuming your are on a tripod for a 2 second exposure, you don't need auto ISO in aperture priority. Keep ISO at 100. The camera will will increase the shutter speed to let the proper amount of light in while you get the benefits of low ISO. Being on a tripod allows you to use longer exposures at low ISO.
Go to
Jan 12, 2019 15:55:39   #
photoman022 wrote:
I regularly received a message that my SanDisk cards were corrupt when downloading photos and the card needed to be repaired. The computer repaired the card and, thankfully, I didn't lose any images in the process. As an experiment, instead of swapping a new memory card each time I downloaded photos (as was my custom) I formatted the memory card, with the computer, and used that memory card multiple times in my camera. Please note: I also format the memory card each time I put in the camera (hence the double formatting). Since starting this double formatting, I have not received any error messages. I used to receive them every time I downloaded photos.

If you have this problem you may want to try this experiment and see if it works for you.
I regularly received a message that my SanDisk car... (show quote)


I always format the card in the camera and never had any problems. In theory, the last format you performed in camera will overwrite the previous format you did on the computer's OS.
Go to
Dec 1, 2018 11:52:46   #
canonclicker wrote:
In the 60's I belonged to the Padre Trails Camera Club on he Monterey Peninsula with members including Wynn Bullock, and Ansel Adams. When we were on the subject of rules. We were told "Learn the rules, then forget them." This has been my rule ever sense.


That's kind of like what Miles Davis said about music theory. "You learn all that stuff and then you forget about it."
Go to
Nov 30, 2018 16:29:39   #
IDguy wrote:
Bryan Peterson suggests having the main subject in the right third of the frame usually works better. (Learning to see Creatively, p. 101). He offers a couple of examples that seem to confirm this. And one that does not, with explanation.

I see the two in support have leading lines to the subject.

I get the idea that ( at least in cultures that read left to right ) the eye enters the frame from the left and if the subject is there stops.

Which do you prefer and why?


It depends. If it's a subject facing the camera left, I'll put the subject camera right. If is subject is facing camera right, I'll put the subject camera left. This gives them some lead room. In other words, I don't want the subject facing the closest side or edge of the shot. There has to be space in front of them, not behind them. If they're facing camera straight on then it doesn't matter too much to me. It also depends on the background too.
Go to
Oct 21, 2018 02:38:24   #
Everyone has mentioned cameras, lenses and other gear. That's just part of it. You have to know the sport the players or team tendencies. It's just as important to anticipate what you're going to shoot. No matter what sport, anticipation and knowing the sport is key. All the equipment in the world wont help unless you know when and where to shoot. That's not always easy, especially with baseball. I learned this from when I worked in TV behind the camera.
Go to
Oct 14, 2018 16:44:11   #
SharpShooter wrote:
That’s right guys, I’m looking for all those mirrorless cameras and haven’t seen one yet! I’m talking about serious cameras, not little toy 4/3’s!
I’m on assignment at Laguna Seca(bicycle races) and there are 250 official photographers here. Been here two days and haven’t seen a mirrorless yet. To be honest, haven’t seen a Nikon either!!! LoL
ALL Canons and mostly 70-200’s.
So where are all those mirrorless cameras? If you know where to find them, please let all of us that never see them, know!!!?
On Sunday I shoot the dual slalom event. It has the most photographers.
Maybe I’ll see one on Sunday? Maybe!?! I’ll cross my fingers and keep you posted! LoL
SS
That’s right guys, I’m looking for all those mirro... (show quote)


I shoot Canon, but I can see the potential for mirrorless whether it's Sony, Canon, Nikon or something else. It's evolving. I think the reason for many of not switching is they are married and committed to their systems because they're heavily invested into their lenses. Also some agencies provide the big pricey lenses to their photographers. Another reason for not changing yet is photographers can still get great images with what they already have. Mirrorless may not dominate the pro market now, but it's coming. That's progress and evolution.
Go to
Sep 24, 2018 20:09:59   #
PatM wrote:
Good Evening,
Maybe a little help here. I am and have been having problems using the Canon Connect software. I am not unfamiliar with phones and software. Hence “ When all else fails... Read the Directions!!”
1. Camera does not show up on the phone in WiFi. (iPhone ) After much profanity and finagling turning on and off the phone and camera (Canon 80D ) sometimes it will show up and connect. It will work okay at that point.
2. Then if anything goes into sleep mode regaining connectivity is a virtual nightmare thus more profanity.
Q: has anyone had similar issue with this feature? It seems to me that this should be a fairly simple task.
Maybe someone has discovered a common flaw on this Model or common user error to explain the issue.
Thanx for any suggestions
Pat
Good Evening, br Maybe a little help here. I am an... (show quote)


Yes, the initial setup can be clunky. Get into the camera menu under one of the "wrenches". Enable the wifi option. Then go to Wi-Fi function setting. You will have 6 options to choose. Select connect to smartphone. Also save this process as a set so you won't have to do it all over again when using Canon Connect. Get into the Wi-fi settings of the phone. You should see the Wi-Fi network for the camera. I also forgot to mention labeling the network in the camera. If you're too slow the network will time out and you'll have to go through the whole process again. Once you have it set up, save the process as a set in the camera. It'll be much easier the next time around.
Go to
Sep 6, 2018 13:54:31   #
It's like insurance. It's better to have it and not need it than to not have it and need it. When it comes to a paycheck, livelihood, and reputation, the extra card slot is a peace of mind.
Go to
Aug 31, 2018 20:48:33   #
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
First thing I did when I got my D850 is put it into Airplane mode. You'd be better off getting a Vello Shutterboss 2 to manage multiple exposures.


Yes, I have something similar to the Shutterboss 2. That will eliminate the need for the phone, Wi-Fi and Live view.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 25 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.