Porn is in the eye of the beholder. To some, boobs are ok but genitals not. Others, genitals ok unless they are deliberately being spread or the cropping is only genitals. Others...as long as there is no penetration or capture of the happy ending it is fine.

Art has often to be on the eyes of the beholder...and if Timmer’s art includes lady bits it’s not mine to judge.

My advice is to get over it...some of his shots are fine, others a little less fine, and others I wonder what the hell he was thinking. But that’s art...the ones I don’t like I just ignore.

However...what is BS...I will skip repeating the word...is the incessant Timmer-hate. If you don’t like it...just don’t look...unless you own the forum or he is in violation of the ToS...you don’t have any more right to badmouth it than the guy in the other thread about No Trespassing signs.

Take a deep, calming breath, wash your hands, and get over it already is my suggestion.

Once again I see misinformation about 'filling the frame'.

For some 'filling the frame' means user the sensor to its fullest in order to use every pixel.

It does not work that way. Regardless of what your end purpose it every capture needs some tweaking (sorry SOCC guys and gals). Tweaking maybe minor (rotating slightly) if you just post on the WEB. This rotation creates a crop so you lose some of your 'precious' pixels.

More often than not you need to crop to a set size that will force cropping. If you have 'filled the sensor' that will to cropping part of your image ans basically destroy it.

Whenever you shoot anything think of the end result you want, not filling your damned sensor. This means your composition must respect the end result and take into account the cropping (and rotating) you will need.

We had a case recently where printing involved such cropping and destroyed the capture. The op has likely learned something.

PP solution.... Post processing is not about correcting such mistake (or any other for that matter) PP is made to enhance a capture, nothing else unless you enter 'interpretative photography processing' that includes compositing and the like.

I recently purchased a Nikon Z7 mirrorless with FTZ adapter and attempted to mount a Tamron 150-600mm G2 which works perfectly with my D500. Once mounted to the Z7 adapter, and power turned on, I immediately get an error on the camera. When I bought the Z7 the dealer told me this lens was a F mount and full frame which would work fine on the Z7. After searching the Tamron website it looks like there may be a firmware update but I can't tell if there was a specific update for this lens. I would appreciate any thoughts/ideas.

Best regards!

Learning how to use fill flash outdoors can really help get better images.
A lot of people are afraid of using flash. It’s not that hard these days and makes a big difference if done correctly.
The Nikons I use work really well with TTL flash, especially if that flash is also a Nikon product.
Do you have a speedlight?
When your subject is within the range of the flash, you can set the FEC (Flash Exposure Compensation) to between -2 & -3 and get really nice shadow fill without it looking overdone.

Here is a good, short explanation: https://neilvn.com/tangents/on-camera-ttl-fill-flash/