Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Billbobboy42
Page: <<prev 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 next>>
Feb 21, 2014 15:29:18   #
[quote=tschmath]r oil is not a fossil fuel and is limitless in supply.

I don't know to what extent the scientific community has signed up to this theory, but it was discussed in detail on either the Science Channel or National Geographic Channel last year. Neither channel is a bastion of right wing garbage.

If I remember correctly, the new thinking is that there was/and is significantly too much oil in the ground to have been created solely from ancient organic remains.

The program discussing this subject was at least an hour long.
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 14:00:52   #
Wendy2 wrote:
Do you know why they "sweep"? It is because it warms the ice a bit and there is less friction, so it moves a little faster! This info is directly from an interview with one of the curlers.

I thought it was to remove miniscule debris out of the path.


Darn, I thought it was janitorial practice!!!
Go to
Feb 20, 2014 13:40:51   #
You might find this interesting, or should it be funny?

NANCY PELOSI 1955

Go to
Feb 20, 2014 12:34:38   #
pipesgt wrote:
FERS is not like a 401K. Civil Service was changed in the 1980's. Those retired Federal Employees on Civil Service pensions cannot draw from Social Security, because they did not pay in to it.


Just to set the record straight, if a Civil Service employee worked in private industry prior to entering gov't service and worked enough quarters to qualify for a Social Security annuity, the SS was earned. However, as mentioned above, changes occurred in the 1980s. Ronald Reagan came into office with a platform to reduce Gov't spending. He appointed as Budget Director a super green eye shade named Stockman (can't remember first name) to look for ways to cut Civil Service costs. One method he called the Windfall Reduction Act, meaning Civil Service employees should not collect FULL Social Security benefits while receiving Civil Service annuities, even if the employee earned SS. The SS entitlement was reduced by some magic formula that was calculated on total time in SS vs total time in Civil Service. The longer one worked paying into SS vs Civil Service time, the more one received in SS annuity. In my case, I qualified for a $500/mo SS annuity, but when I filed for it, the annuity was reduced to $200/mo. My wife, on the other hand, worked almost as long in private industry as she did in Civil Service. Her SS annuity entitlement, before the Stockman cut, was around $600/mo. Her actual SS annuity after the "cut" was $400/mo. There were a number of other Stockman cuts to Civil Service benefits, but to bring this post to a close I'll refrain from bringing them up.
Go to
Feb 19, 2014 09:25:20   #
[quote=SpeedyWilson]. Maybe you could even become a Notary yourself,

I'm curious, can a notary "notorize" his/her self?
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 14:52:48   #
BboH wrote:
Possibly the problem is the combined delivery UPS and FedEx have entered into with the USPS, UPS and Fed Ex get it to the local USPS delivery area and hand it off the Postal Service for delivery to the home. In Baltimore, we got no mail Thursday, to be expected, but also no mail on Friday when road were mostly clear nor Saturday - Roads CLEAR. What (was) the motto- neither rain nor...


Bob, glad you brought this up. UPS & Fedex have catchy names for their USPS contracts. I believe the UPS/USPS arrangement is called "SmartPost". I don't remember the name Fedex uses, but the bottom line for me is slower delivery service. As of now, I have not needed a mail order item so quickly that I feel a need to complain. However, it's interesting to follow package tracking with these arrangements.

As most of you know, Adorama & B&H offer free shipping on quite a few of their products. My recent experiences (past 2 years or so) are with B&H. B&H store is approx 250 miles due north of my home. Low cost and/or light weight items are shipped "SmartPost". With SmartPost, the item travels from NYC to Allentown, Pa, then on to Hagerstown, Md, then to Martinsburg, Wva, and then non-stop to my home town, Salisbury, Md. I have had several packages shipped this way and they are always delivered to the local post office late in the morning - too late to get on the Postal Service delivery truck the same day. Since the above route is always the same, it is not a shipping anomaly. High end items, like lens and camera bodies, are shipped door-to-door by UPS and I get them the day after shipment.

My take on all of this is that it must save UPS/Fedex money by having the Postal Service do the home delivery. There must be times when UPS & Fedex only have a few deliveries to make in a particular neighborhood, thus using more fuel than what the Postal Service would use since the Postal Service is going past every home on the route even if some homes will not be getting mail that day. Of course, the Postal Service must be getting a benefit for this. You would not expect them to do it for free.
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 10:35:29   #
Everything is challenging to me; even the landscape won't stand still
Go to
Feb 17, 2014 10:26:06   #
Morning Star wrote:

The main reason I moved on, was not the quality of the photos, but the fact that it became more and more difficult to find stores carrying the Smart Media cards. Of course today, the card capacity is a problem too: 4 - 128 mb (yes! mb) for that little camera, and you really can't print much larger than a 4 x 6 photo, maybe a 5 x 7 - but all that is in hind-sight. For its time, it was a fantastic camera. I should put some batteries in mine and use it again ;-)


I still have my Olympus C500Zoom, but have not used it since I lost all my pictures taken on a vacation. It was the Smart Media card. The night before leaving to come home, I checked the pics and all was well. When I got home, all I got in the display window was the blue screen of death - "Card Failure". Previously, I had had several card failures, but didn't lose anything of importance. When I got the failure notices, I tossed the cards and purchased new ones. Smart Media advised that the cards did NOT have an indefinite life span. I learned too late that had I saved the card, the pictures could very well have been salvaged. And I have no plans on returning to the vacation location, since I have been there 4 times. Of course, I waited until the last visit to take pics. Figure!
Go to
Feb 16, 2014 15:59:32   #
magicray wrote:

condoms.

Oh, I forgot the most important item. An expensive blow-up-doll I bought from F16 Club.


Blow-up doll and condoms? Can't beat that combination :lol:
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 10:04:11   #
ottopj wrote:
One version of origin of Valentines day. http://www.npr.org/2011/02/14/133693152/the-dark-origins-of-valentines-day

The Dark Origins Of Valentine's Day
by ARNIE SEIPEL
February 13, 2011 8:36 AM
Valentine's Day is a time to celebrate romance and love and kissy-face fealty. But the origins of this festival of candy and cupids are actually dark, bloody — and a bit muddled.

A drawing depicts the death of St. Valentine — one of them, anyway. The Romans executed two men by that name on Feb. 14 of different years in the 3rd century A.D.i
A drawing depicts the death of St. Valentine — one of them, anyway. The Romans executed two men by that name on Feb. 14 of different years in the 3rd century A.D.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Though no one has pinpointed the exact origin of the holiday, one good place to start is ancient Rome, where men hit on women by, well, hitting them.

Those Wild And Crazy Romans

From Feb. 13 to 15, the Romans celebrated the feast of Lupercalia. The men sacrificed a goat and a dog, then whipped women with the hides of the animals they had just slain.

The Roman romantics "were drunk. They were naked," says Noel Lenski, a historian at the University of Colorado at Boulder. Young women would actually line up for the men to hit them, Lenski says. They believed this would make them fertile.

The brutal fete included a matchmaking lottery, in which young men drew the names of women from a jar. The couple would then be, um, coupled up for the duration of the festival — or longer, if the match was right.

The ancient Romans may also be responsible for the name of our modern day of love. Emperor Claudius II executed two men — both named Valentine — on Feb. 14 of different years in the 3rd century A.D. Their martyrdom was honored by the Catholic Church with the celebration of St. Valentine's Day.

Later, Pope Gelasius I muddled things in the 5th century by combining St. Valentine's Day with Lupercalia to expel the pagan rituals. But the festival was more of a theatrical interpretation of what it had once been. Lenski adds, "It was a little more of a drunken revel, but the Christians put clothes back on it. That didn't stop it from being a day of fertility and love."

Around the same time, the Normans celebrated Galatin's Day. Galatin meant "lover of women." That was likely confused with St. Valentine's Day at some point, in part because they sound alike.

William Shakespeare helped romanticize Valentine's Day in his work, and it gained popularity throughout Britain and the rest of Europe.i
William Shakespeare helped romanticize Valentine's Day in his work, and it gained popularity throughout Britain and the rest of Europe.

Perry-Castañeda Library, University of Texas
Shakespeare In Love

As the years went on, the holiday grew sweeter. Chaucer and Shakespeare romanticized it in their work, and it gained popularity throughout Britain and the rest of Europe. Handmade paper cards became the tokens-du-jour in the Middle Ages.

Eventually, the tradition made its way to the New World. The industrial revolution ushered in factory-made cards in the 19th century. And in 1913, Hallmark Cards of Kansas City, Mo., began mass producing valentines. February has not been the same since.

Today, the holiday is big business: According to market research firm IBIS World, Valentine's Day sales reached $17.6 billion last year; this year's sales are expected to total $18.6 billion.

But that commercialization has spoiled the day for many. Helen Fisher, a sociologist at Rutgers University, says we have only ourselves to blame.

"This isn't a command performance," she says. "If people didn't want to buy Hallmark cards, they would not be bought, and Hallmark would go out of business."

And so the celebration of Valentine's Day goes on, in varied ways. Many will break the bank buying jewelry and flowers for their beloveds. Others will celebrate in a SAD (that's Single Awareness Day) way, dining alone and binging on self-gifted chocolates. A few may even be spending this day the same way the early Romans did. But let's not go there.
One version of origin of Valentines day. http://w... (show quote)


Darn, I thought it started with the St. Valentines' massacre in Chicago :!:
Go to
Feb 15, 2014 09:56:07   #
I've never tried that :roll: . Can you see anything looking in reverse? Would it be like looking into binoculars reversed?

LoL, got to be a blond joke coming out of this somewhere!
Go to
Feb 14, 2014 10:33:03   #
Thus far in this post, no one has mentioned using a Canon scanner. I bought a CanoScan 9950F several years ago, I think during the Microsoft Windows XP era. This scanner is optimized for film. The slide holder holds 15 slides, thus saving some time in reloading the holder. Now, you might still want to take a coffee break while scanning is in progress 8-) . I have scanned slides that I took in the 1960s and got quite good results.

This model, of course, is no longer in production. Canon's newest model that appears to be similar is the 9000F. I don't have a clue why Canon went backwards with model #s, but from what I could glean from comparing the two models' specs, I plan on holding to my older model as long as possible.
Go to
Feb 13, 2014 15:56:30   #
Tiny Tim the Squirrel wrote:
Holy cow!! Did you see some of those guys? They're not using scopes, they're using canons with lenses! :lol:


Yea, and with my luck - living in the Peoples Republik of Maryland - I'd get arrested for using an assault weapon in a public place, lol :roll:
Go to
Feb 13, 2014 15:46:53   #
amehta wrote:
Some really amazing shots. I do wish I knew if any were done in processing, not in a single image capture.


My take is that, at a minimum, a good number are done using layering in pp.
Go to
Feb 13, 2014 09:41:43   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Next time, photograph the snow before it gets so dirty. :D


How come nobody photographs yellow snow :XD:
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.