Posts for: jdub82
Jul 27, 2020 09:35:30 #
Nice shot! I'm not sure I would want him that close to my backyard. Don't have to worry about that in California. Instead we have rattlesnakes and mountain lions to be concerned with lol.......
Jul 26, 2020 11:00:47 #
Jul 26, 2020 10:59:39 #
Jul 26, 2020 10:56:32 #
Jul 26, 2020 10:55:09 #
Jul 26, 2020 10:30:38 #
bleirer wrote:
Canon has a 1 year warranty on refurbished. $395 for the 77d, also deals on m50, rebel, and RP (if interested in full frame.) https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/cameras/refurbished-eos-interchangeable-lens-cameras
Canon refurbished is a great way to go! However the 77D is out of stock right now on their refurbished site.
Jul 26, 2020 10:26:37 #
47greyfox wrote:
The difference can be stated in one word, “risk.” All you’ve read is true. Speak softly and carry a Canon. 😎
Jul 26, 2020 10:23:50 #
Jun 30, 2020 10:59:34 #
Jun 30, 2020 10:57:34 #
tramsey wrote:
Olympus Tough TG2. It came out 2013 waterproof, shatter proof etc. It earned a 79% silver award from DP Review
I agree that the TG series from Olympus would be worth considering. The TG6 is the current model. It sells for about $350.00 new. (Less $$ than many smart phones).
Jun 27, 2020 10:35:25 #
Thomas902 wrote:
",,,Unless you like distortion, I wouldn’t recommend anything much wider than 50mm for either subject..."
This is absurd... and obvious the poster doesn't have clue on how to effective use wide angle optics..
Many published fashion editorials are shot far wider than 24mm (FX)
enough said...
This is absurd... and obvious the poster doesn't have clue on how to effective use wide angle optics..
Many published fashion editorials are shot far wider than 24mm (FX)
enough said...
Jun 27, 2020 10:31:08 #
Jun 1, 2020 06:10:45 #
Abo wrote:
If you cant get the photos you want with a 6DmkII,
$100,000 worth of camera won't work for you either.
If there's a problem here, it's the "photographer", sure as heck not the camera.
Shakes head in disbelief.
$100,000 worth of camera won't work for you either.
If there's a problem here, it's the "photographer", sure as heck not the camera.
Shakes head in disbelief.
Really?!? Did you even read his post? You were so quick to accuse the OP of not having skills as a photographer The OP is looking for a camera better suited to sports. The 6DII is a great camera but does not have a high burst rate and is not typically recommended for sports. Several cameras mentioned are better for fast action and sports. Perhaps you should take the time to read a post all the way through before making absurd comments.
May 28, 2020 06:16:24 #
wilderness wrote:
We thankfully got a good downpour on Day 4 which n... (show quote)
Great images! Thanks for posting.
May 27, 2020 18:08:10 #
Abo wrote:
A D700 does (very very good) stills only.
No video Danger911.
I was wondering if your username is a reference to the
the motoring journalists that threw so many Porsche 930s
off the (often mountain) roads when the were released in the 70s.
No video Danger911.
I was wondering if your username is a reference to the
the motoring journalists that threw so many Porsche 930s
off the (often mountain) roads when the were released in the 70s.
It looks like you were trying to reply to Danger911, but addressed your reply to my comment instead. I did not make any reference to the D700 in my comments. My comment was simply a response to the misguided blanket statement by bobsprez about "Nikon DSLRs" not being well suited for video.