I'm just as guilty as everyone else. I want more gear. I hope my DH gets tired of me spending $20 per roll to get CD, negatives, upload, and 4x6 prints at
www.thedarkroom.com and allows me to get a digital SLR, or mirrorless. The price ranges are all over the place. When quality is at stake, and price is not necessarily an indication of quality, it looks like you might regret what you buy. I don't have an answer. I've been using my DH Canon EOS 620 film camera from 1987. It was top of the line (for 35 mm) in those days. It has only a zoom 100-300mm 1:5.6 lens, and that is all he has.
I think the $20 per roll is going to double soon. With inflation, and the cost of living, I don't see how
www.thedarkroom.com can tolerate such a low price. IMHO.
So I am trying to enjoy the Canon film camera I have. Plus, thedarkroom company has a B&W photo portrait contest that I want to enter. The idea is to show a "lot of character" in someone's face. I am planning on seeing my best friend, Diana, this coming week and I hope to submit a portrait picture of her. I have B&W film in the Canon right now.
I seriously believe that the prices are going to tumble. And quality is going to tumble too. I banged the Canon on a chair. Not a big impact, but would a cheaper camera survive a bang? Even Amazon is selling " Accident protection warrantee" but is it worth 20% of the sales price? I would seriously wonder if you could even make a claim if you did buy the "Accident protection warrantee." I think you have to just accept that a "bang" is going to break the camera.
If Amazon is selling "Accident Protection warrantee" so blatantly then I guarantee these cameras are going to break easily. And the warrantee might not be available when you need it. I've had experience with added on warrantees. They don't exist after you buy them. I've been there. (For a TV and it happened to me in 1996 - it was a third party).
I'm just as guilty as everyone else. I want more ... (