Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Aperture knowledge required on APSC camera
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
Sep 27, 2017 06:29:34   #
35B Loc: Australia
 
If I put a 300mm 2.8 lens froma Nikon D610 camera onto a Nikon D7100 camera, I understand that I would get the field of view equivalent to 450mm. My question is does the 2.8 aperture change?
My current thinking is it would give me a 450mm 2.8, but uncertain.

Thanks in advance for your help.
35B

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 06:33:16   #
JPL
 
What really happens is that nothing changes with the lens, it will still be 300mm and f2.8 no matter what camera you put behind it. The only change is the sensor size. D7100 has smaller sensor and often referred to as crop sensor because it will crop the image the lens is projecting when compared to a full frame sensor. Then change in field of view is only related to the crop sensor being smaller than full fram sensor. That is it.

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 06:44:16   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
35B wrote:
If I put a 300mm 2.8 lens froma Nikon D610 camera onto a Nikon D7100 camera, I understand that I would get the field of view equivalent to 450mm. My question is does the 2.8 aperture change?
My current thinking is it would give me a 450mm 2.8, but uncertain.

Thanks in advance for your help.
35B


Right - 450mm equivalent. That's why many people like to use an FX lens on a DX body. The aperture is determined by a mathematical formula based on measurements of the lens, so that never changes - real or equivalent.

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2017 06:44:49   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JPL wrote:
What really happens is that nothing changes with the lens, it will still be 300mm and f2.8 no matter what camera you put behind it. The only change is the sensor size. D7100 has smaller sensor and often referred to as crop sensor because it will crop the image the lens is projecting when compared to a full frame sensor. Then change in field of view is only related to the crop sensor being smaller than full fram sensor. That is it.



Reply
Sep 27, 2017 07:30:03   #
cdayton
 
JPL wrote:
What really happens is that nothing changes with the lens, it will still be 300mm and f2.8 no matter what camera you put behind it. The only change is the sensor size. D7100 has smaller sensor and often referred to as crop sensor because it will crop the image the lens is projecting when compared to a full frame sensor. Then change in field of view is only related to the crop sensor being smaller than full fram sensor. That is it.


πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 07:34:56   #
cdayton
 
PS it's more or less the same way a cell phone does telephoto - crops off the edges and enlarges to cover its tiny sensor.

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 07:59:50   #
Tracy B. Loc: Indiana
 
Watch this:
https://youtu.be/DtDotqLx6nA

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2017 08:06:33   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
The simple answer, no, 2.8 is 2.8.

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 21:38:44   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
Interesting. The video says the opposite of the posters here. It says, the crop factor is also multiplied by the aperture in regard to equivalent depth of field. And iso is multiplied by crop factor squared in terms of equivalent noise.

Tracy B. wrote:

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 23:50:49   #
cameraf4 Loc: Delaware
 
And the video is much more objective as well. We should all thank Tracy for bringing this to us. I know I learned stuff.

Reply
Sep 27, 2017 23:56:42   #
dandi Loc: near Seattle, WA
 
I think it’s a great article that answers many questions we have here. Especially I like what he said at the end (part 11, the Summary). Enjoy.

https://photographylife.com/sensor-crop-factors-and-equivalence

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2017 04:25:26   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Tracy B. wrote:


This is nonsense Tracy. Not your fault, but his explanation is a bit convoluted and ill-informed.

While it is true that depth of field changes, he does not take into consideration the greater enlargement required to get to the same print size which diminishes DoF. If you read any and all DoF tables, they will show that for the same lens at the same distance and aperture, changing just the sensor size will result in less, not greater depth of field. The increase in depth of field occurs as you move back with the crop sensor to get the same framing due to the narrower angle of view when the lens is used on the crop sensor.

Reply
Sep 28, 2017 04:27:40   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
35B wrote:
If I put a 300mm 2.8 lens froma Nikon D610 camera onto a Nikon D7100 camera, I understand that I would get the field of view equivalent to 450mm. My question is does the 2.8 aperture change?
My current thinking is it would give me a 450mm 2.8, but uncertain.

Thanks in advance for your help.
35B


No, the aperture does not change. F2.8 on crop is the same as F2.8 on full frame. There are depth of field considerations, which you should study using the many DoF table and calculators.

Reply
Sep 28, 2017 05:04:22   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Gene51 wrote:
This is nonsense Tracy. Not your fault, but his explanation is a bit convoluted and ill-informed.

While it is true that depth of field changes, he does not take into consideration the greater enlargement required to get to the same print size which diminishes DoF. If you read any and all DoF tables, they will show that for the same lens at the same distance and aperture, changing just the sensor size will result in less, not greater depth of field. The increase in depth of field occurs as you move back with the crop sensor to get the same framing due to the narrower angle of view when the lens is used on the crop sensor.
This is nonsense Tracy. Not your fault, but his ex... (show quote)



Reply
Sep 28, 2017 05:07:28   #
Tracy B. Loc: Indiana
 
Gene51 wrote:
This is nonsense Tracy. Not your fault, but his explanation is a bit convoluted and ill-informed.

While it is true that depth of field changes, he does not take into consideration the greater enlargement required to get to the same print size which diminishes DoF. If you read any and all DoF tables, they will show that for the same lens at the same distance and aperture, changing just the sensor size will result in less, not greater depth of field. The increase in depth of field occurs as you move back with the crop sensor to get the same framing due to the narrower angle of view when the lens is used on the crop sensor.
This is nonsense Tracy. Not your fault, but his ex... (show quote)

Yes well, watch this: (not your fault)
https://youtu.be/0OtIiwbAZi8
Gene: especially look at 34:20 in video.

Reply
Page 1 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.