The New Raw Programs
Sep 27, 2017 08:00:14 #
Aurora and On1 have introduced software to deal with raw files. What will happen when a new model camera is introduced? Will users have to wait for them to catch up, as with PS? That would seem to be the only course of action available to them.
Sep 28, 2017 12:18:22 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Aurora and On1 have introduced software to deal with raw files. What will happen when a new model camera is introduced? Will users have to wait for them to catch up, as with PS? That would seem to be the only course of action available to them.
Of course there'll be a delay. The question is, who will update in a responsive manner, and who won't? I don't use Corel products because they were, a few years ago, astonishly slow. So far, Adobe has been very good about updating.
Sep 28, 2017 12:22:47 #
DWU2 wrote:
Of course there'll be a delay. The question is, who will update in a responsive manner, and who won't? I don't use Corel products because they were, a few years ago, astonishly slow. So far, Adobe has been very good about updating.
That's one of the reason I stop using Lightroom because Adobe was so slow updating.
Sep 28, 2017 14:33:28 #
HOT Texas wrote:
That's one of the reason I stop using Lightroom because Adobe was so slow updating.
On the other hand, there those of us who are slow updating their cameras. Real slow. like months or years.
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Sep 28, 2017 15:44:19 #
Rich1939 wrote:
On the other hand, there those of us who are slow updating their cameras. Real slow. like months or years.
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
And every camera seems to need its own raw specs, for some reason.
Sep 28, 2017 15:47:38 #
Rich1939 wrote:
On the other hand, there those of us who are slow updating their cameras. Real slow. like months or years.
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
I am slow updating my camera, but keep in mine, when a manufacture comes out with a new camera (a new model) that software company better be on there game, people are going to buy that camera as soon as it hits the shelf, if not before then. if the raw want work with that software, there going with another software that does work.
Keep this in mind, you go out and buy a $1,000 camera, you got it, your proud of it, you spent your hard earned money, but you can't shoot raw? Adobe failed me twice, it want happen again, I'm done with them. A company like Adobe should the first one on the market to upgrade there software not 3-6 months later.
Sep 28, 2017 15:49:32 #
HOT Texas wrote:
I am slow updating my camera, but keep in mine, wh... (show quote)
rinse and repeat.
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Sep 28, 2017 16:35:51 #
Rich1939 wrote:
rinse and repeat.
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Other software company's receive there's before Adobe?
Sep 28, 2017 16:39:57 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
Rich1939 wrote:
On the other hand, there those of us who are slow updating their cameras. Real slow. like months or years.
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
Keep in mind that software companies are stuck at the starting line until they receive input from the camera mfg .
It's a shame that camera manufacturers refuse to communicate with top editing software companies for camera profile updates in advance of release dates.
Sep 28, 2017 16:44:54 #
Racmanaz wrote:
It's a shame that camera manufacturers refuse to communicate with top editing software companies for camera profile updates in advance of release dates.
I agree!!! Always wondered why that was.
Sep 28, 2017 17:08:42 #
HOT Texas wrote:
That's one of the reason I stop using Lightroom because Adobe was so slow updating.
Compared to what? When I used Corel, it took them 12 months to update for my new camera. With Adobe, it seems to take, maybe, 2 months. Is anyone doing it faster?
Sep 28, 2017 17:39:29 #
Racmanaz wrote:
It's a shame that camera manufacturers refuse to communicate with top editing software companies for camera profile updates in advance of release dates.
The inability process raw immediately could slow initial camera sales.
Sep 28, 2017 17:44:29 #
jerryc41 wrote:
The inability process raw immediately could slow initial camera sales.
The inability process raw immediately could slow initial camera sales.
in the mean time there is the Adobe dng converter and Nixon's NX-D processor. It isn't like new users can't work with the D850 raw files at all, there is a way.
Sep 28, 2017 18:37:32 #
DWU2 wrote:
Compared to what? When I used Corel, it took them 12 months to update for my new camera. With Adobe, it seems to take, maybe, 2 months. Is anyone doing it faster?
Capture One was the first to have it for my camera, Don't know about your camera.
Sep 28, 2017 18:38:33 #
Rich1939 wrote:
in the mean time there is the Adobe dng converter and Nixon's NX-D processor. It isn't like new users can't work with the D850 raw files at all, there is a way.
I don't shoot Nikon, but yes there always a way around it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.