Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ArnieA
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Mar 5, 2013 11:24:33   #
I thought you were talking about the U.S. until you mentioned an election in 2013!

I thought he was talking about Canada!

Arnie
Go to
Mar 1, 2013 18:37:50   #
all to create a long “eh” at the end. We’re not in Canada anymore, eh?

Now that is cleared up, have fun with your bo-ke!"[/quote]

I thought only the Yanks used it
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 18:06:02   #
[quote=GoofyNewfie]
ArnieA wrote:
quonnie wrote:

Please forgive my ignorance, but on what type camera is a "leaf shutter" found?



Leaf shutters are still in use with some of the current medium format digitals.


Why. Is the shutter opening so large that the curtain style is inefficient? What other advantage is there?

Arnie
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 13:27:26   #
Hello UHH member I'm new to the forum; I have a question I was asked to take pictures on a professional event that will take place in a big white room holding around 200 people, the room has a mid round glass roof for natural light and additional flourecent lights; all chairs and tables are white this event will take place at noon (when sun ir right in the middle of the room, just wondering what would be the best settings to take pictures with a lots of bright light. My gear is a Nikon D600, 28-300 zoom and SB-900 flash. Any ideas will be appreciated Thanks in advance.

It would help if we knew what camera you were using.

I have a cannon T3i and there is an adjustment (White balance?) where you can set what type of lighting you are in-Sun, cloudy, night, etc.

Look it up in your manual. From what you have said about the room and the sun I would set up for a sunny day so your pics don't turn out 'grey'. All cameras as I know them try to turn all pics ito grey tones. (I could use a little help in explaining this).

And as someone said go there early and experiment. Don't forget your manual. :D

Arnie
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 13:09:25   #
quonnie wrote:
Pablo8 wrote:
papakatz45 wrote:
This is a question about how shutter speed is actually measured. Shutter speed is the amount of time the shutter is open during the exposure. Is this time measured from the when the shutter first starts to open until it is completly closed or is it just the time the shutter is fully open excluding the time from start to full and from full to close?


Consider this, then... A leaf shutter (as opposed to a focal-plane shutter) I hope you know the difference. With the aperture set at full-bore for instance f/1.4..OK are you keeping up? The shutter blades open from their closed position, and exposure begins to take place. But the aperture through which the light is coming, is changing from a tiny hole (f/32...f/22..f/16 ) etc., to the full opening area of the diaphragm blades..f/1.4 and the shutter blades close down again through the ever diminishing size hole. So...some of the exposure has been made through an aperture other than your selected f/1.4....Fact?...or Fiction?
quote=papakatz45 This is a question about how shu... (show quote)


Please forgive my ignorance, but on what type camera is a "leaf shutter" found?
quote=Pablo8 quote=papakatz45 This is a question... (show quote)


A very old one!

Arnie
Go to
Feb 27, 2013 13:06:31   #
[quote=Nikonian72]Unfortunately, the term shutter "speed" has been incorrectly used for decades. The speed of the leading shutter and the trailing shutter are constant. What varies is the timing between curtains, which alters the time duration that the sensor sees the scene between curtains.

"Shutter duration" is a more accurate term to describe shutter speed.

I agree.

What I have heard;

At slow shutter speeds-1/60 for example the second curtain starts to close when the first curtain is at a certain distance along the picture.

Lets say for example (I'm picking #s here) that distance is 1". That means that the 1st curtain has moved 1" before the 2nd curtain starts to close.

At fast speeds- 1/1000 the 2nd curtain starts across that much earlier- 1/4" lag.

To my understanding it is the space in between the curtains that determins shutter "speed" because the film is exposed for less time at the faster speed.

Arnie
Go to
Feb 16, 2013 16:48:39   #
donrosshill wrote:
I have been using Norton symantic 360 for a couple of years. It seems to really slowdown my PC "Windows 7 (64).
does anyone have any experiance with windows Security Essential.??


Works well. Another one you may want to try is peerblock. It's amazing what is out there trying to get in. So far it is on the lookout for more than 1,000,000,000 sites on my computer. As far away as China and all the way from ad sites to schools.

Arnie
Go to
Jan 6, 2013 13:21:19   #
I did after I posted. I'm not on the forum every day so if I have offended anyone I'm sorry.

Arnie
Go to
Jan 4, 2013 13:33:14   #
Just to stir the pot a little. I read in a Consumers Report (Nov. I think) that the t3i is better than the t4i. Any comments?

Arnie
Go to
Jan 3, 2013 13:32:10   #
There is one way that might help. It is a saying from sailors. Red sky at night- sailors delight. Red sky in morn- sailers mourn. If the first it will probably be clear and not what you're looking for. But the second may work for you. Hope this helps.

Arnie
Go to
Nov 13, 2012 14:55:15   #
Hi

This is what I think of this day. I hope I can upload this. If its not sucesfull (sp) I hope you take it the way I wished.

Arnie

Attached file:
(Download)
Go to
Oct 31, 2012 15:09:14   #
BigDaveMT wrote:
beverett wrote:
Screamin Scott wrote:
We almost all like the blurred effect of moving water... Not to mention frozen motion....LOL


ALMOST ALL is right. It's a fad, as I said in an earlier post. It looks like melting ice cream, whipped cream or spilled milk. Ask yourself, "Is that really what I saw?"


I first saw blurred water photos in a magazine put out by Pentax when I bought my K1000 in the late 70's. By definition a fad is:
Noun:
An intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, esp. one that is short-lived; a craze.

30+ years is not short lived in my book.
quote=beverett quote=Screamin Scott We almost al... (show quote)


Ditto

Arnie
Go to
Oct 31, 2012 15:07:37   #
ArnieA wrote:
Nikonian72 wrote:
Nikon D5000 at ISO 100, Nikkor 18-55 zoom lens at 55-mm, 0.6-sec at f/36, overcast sky & moderately dense tree foliage.


The only problem I have is that you need to increase your depth of field and this photo would be awesome. Try it again at a much higher f- stop- like 16+.

That is my advice.

Arnie


I'm trying to refer to the first photo. After posting I reread the stats and I don't know what is wrong. Please ignore reply except for the fact that you need more depth of field for the 1 st photo. Sorry I'm new at posting.

Arnie
Go to
Oct 31, 2012 15:03:15   #
Nikonian72 wrote:
Nikon D5000 at ISO 100, Nikkor 18-55 zoom lens at 55-mm, 0.6-sec at f/36, overcast sky & moderately dense tree foliage.


The only problem I have is that you need to increase your depth of field and this photo would be awesome. Try it again at a much higher f- stop- like 16+.

That is my advice.

Arnie
Go to
Oct 15, 2012 15:37:39   #
jimward wrote:
I’ve been a member of UHH for months, and joining is probably the smartest thing I’ve done in ages. Best general education system available.

But…..

I thought I was beginning to understand a bit about photography. In terms of technical knowledge I’d rate myself in the bottom 25%, but every now and then someone asks a question that makes me feel a bit smug. (I don’t offer answers, though, ‘cos I might be wrong).

I’m familiar with most of the leading brands and models, so I know what to fantasise about if I ever accumulate any spare cash. I know that a 5MP picture will reproduce perfectly well in magazines (and I get some published) and I thought I knew that beyond about 10MP the main function of megapixels was to allow you to produce bigger and bigger prints, and that a camera that could produce 18MP images was about as good as it gets. I also thought I knew that most people used Lightroom, Photoshop or Elements as their frontline PP tools (see, I know “PP”), aided by plug-ins from Topaz and others, like Nik, Alien Skin and so on. I even use Topaz myself.

A long build-up, but here’s the punchline. I read a magazine article recently that made me realize that I know squat. There’s a whole photographic world out there that I’d never even heard of. And it wasn’t even a photographic magazine.

The story – in the Qantas in-flight magazine - was about a group of photographers on a gig in the South West of Western Australia, sponsored by the local tourism body. The pictures they published were predictably professional. It was their equipment and methodology that left me wondering if I should stick to tennis.

Try this:

“Shot with a Phase One 645DF with a 28mm F/4.5 Schneider lens and Phase One P65 digital back.” Another photographer processed his images in Phocus software before “being graded, retouched and composited” by Live Picture software. But wait – before this happened, the photographer “captured four multi-shot exposures at four separate planes of focus” after which “the HC 50mm II lens was raised 12mm to create a fifth exposure extending into the sky.” The cameras involved are apparently capable of 80MP resolution (yep, that’s 80MP).

What’s my question? It’s this. How many UHH members (excluding the obvious three or four) would really understand what’s going on here? Be honest, now. And what’s the function of an 80MP image? To produce a print large enough to paper the side of a warehouse?

Should I be depressed here? Are most UHH members familiar with this gear? Am I really that far behind the field?

(I don't want anyone to explain what all that tech stuff is about - I checked a few websites myself. I just need to be reassured that most other UHH gang members don't understand it either.)
I’ve been a member of UHH for months, and joining ... (show quote)


In my opinion You should look around and find out if some College (That was how I did it) has a basic camera course that you can take at night. These courses are for the beginner and they go into the basics. This is a lens and this is how to take it off and put it on. This will make you able to understand your camera better. Then Practice,Practice,Practice! Your shots are not going to look good so far but that is where the next course comes in. Composition- You learn the basics of what makes a good shot and what doesn't. More practice. Nobody becomes good overnight or in a year. None of us experienced people did and neither will you.

Above all have fun!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.