Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: wham121736
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 48 next>>
Apr 6, 2022 06:26:52   #
Great photos. Is no3 wearing a flight recorder?..
capmike wrote:
A few from the files. With over 20,000 photos of birds, thousands in flight, many many taking off, it is amazing how few I have of the landing. Something to work on.
Go to
Mar 27, 2022 06:40:57   #
Where on Long Island are you and the preserve located? I live in East Setauket and have not found any GBH.
Bill H
Photoladybon wrote:
My first photo submission to UHH so please be kind. I took this image at a very small wildlife preserve on Long Island which has a pair of nesting eagles. Out of the corner of my eye I saw this GBH fly and I followed it. Using my brand new Olympus OM-1 and 150-400mm lens, I was able to capture this beauty. Very little processing except to clean up the branches and the usual LR adjustments--I thought the images obtained with this new camera were pretty good so far. Much of the noise issues associated with previous models has been addressed and the AI is very good. I will show some eagle photos soon.
CC welcome.
My first photo submission to UHH so please be kind... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 16, 2022 07:32:43   #
Isn’t this a distinction without a difference? When I open either I have on my screen an image which needs more (RAW) or less (JPG) additional processing. Let’s stop beating a dead horse!

R.G. wrote:
A raw file contains sensor data. A jpg file contains image data.

As you point out, they're both data but the jpg data is further along in the process of creating an image. More specifically, a jpg file contains pixel data whereas the data in a raw file has to be rendered in order to get pixel information out of it. Monitors and printers need pixel data in a recognised format such as jpg, tif etc.
Go to
Mar 14, 2022 06:42:37   #
Your comment reminds me of how the donkeys on the trail down into the Grand Canyon maneuver around some of the tight switchbacks while the jack asses atop the donkeys fear for their lives.
One Rude Dawg wrote:
Great shots, love the desert. Tightest switch back I ever did was here in North Idaho on Montana line. I had to back up once to make it around and it was still tight and steep. I was driving a Suzuki Samurai.
Great shots, love the desert. Tightest switch back... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 12, 2022 06:22:26   #
I would crop out the leftmost sign and much of the right and top making him and the one protest sign more prominent, and make the fence on the left vertical.
Hip Coyote wrote:
Just as prior post, this shot was submitted to my photo club for evaluation by a pro. This was in the open category, so there was no theme.

After you critique, I will tell you what the pro said.

No repost and small file size on this.
Go to
Mar 5, 2022 06:53:51   #
Remove the half bun on the right.

Tito14 wrote:
For me, please critique!

Ernesto
Go to
Mar 1, 2022 07:03:32   #
Three Pancakes, blueberries, strawberries and bananas? A great breakfast.
markngolf wrote:
My wife keeps asking for it. I don't enjoy it, but I make the sacrifice!

Thanks for viewing!
Mark
Go to
Feb 27, 2022 07:09:07   #
Google murmuration and you will find many thousands of starlings in flight.
Go to
Feb 24, 2022 06:39:25   #
Amen!

NickGee wrote:
Just because post-processing software enables you to turn a sunrise green, vomit pastel, and breasts blue doesn't mean you SHOULD. The aphorism "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" belongs in the same garbage bin as "the customer is always right." Sheesh!

While not a popular view on UHH, I find all of these oversaturated sunsets, overprocessed house pets, and all of the rest of those entirely unnatural "views" of nature aesthetically offensive. I know I'll get flamed for this but just can't help myself. I prefer the colors and contours of nature to the fakery of over-processed imagery.
Just because post-processing software enables you ... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 20, 2022 06:25:18   #
Nice shots but #1 and 2 looks like front and front.
jackm1943 wrote:
This is some sort of seed pod I found yesterday while walking my dog. The first two are close-ups front and back, and the next two are 1X macros front and back.
Go to
Feb 18, 2022 10:44:49   #
Try smugmug. It’s reasonably priced and easy to set up galleries, either password protected or open to public viewing. I have several you can visit at whammer.smugmug.com
plumbbob1 wrote:
I have a gallery on WIX. I thought it would be just the ticket, but I find it just to expensive and to complicated for what I wanted.

I had a Zenfolio gallery at one time, but when they went "WOKE" I canceled it. Maybe I cut off my nose ......
However, the main thing I didn't like about Zenfolio was that to access the gallery there name came first. Otherwise, it was straight forward and support was good.

My purpose for the gallery is to have my photos available for family and friends and a place to send customers.

I have them already in PSE albums and plan on transferring them a folder at a time.

What have your experiences been?
I have a gallery on WIX. I thought it would be jus... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 15, 2022 06:55:57   #
Luck comes most often to those who are prepared, and you were.

Curmudgeon wrote:
I pushed the button on a 3 shot burst
Go to
Feb 13, 2022 07:51:23   #
Get rid of the distracting white sneakers and the black will be un-noticeable.
Shooter41 wrote:
Dear NJFrank...

I think your comments are right on the money. The single mother had the little guy to constantly watch her only respond to her commands and ignore everyone else. After raising a hand to get his attention and him ignoring me out of his peripheral vision, I immediately realized that my waiting until the boy turned to look at me would result in his mother taking his picture and them walking off without him ever looking at me.

Since I wanted to capture that smile with my camera even without their cooperation, I knew I had to go ahead and take a picture with him looking away from me at his mom. You are correct in that I should have cropped out the leg on the left and I did want to include the team logo, but not have Chico image overshadow the little boy and become the subject of my picture. Thank you for your excellent observations. Shooter41
Dear NJFrank... br br I think your comments are r... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 11, 2022 07:08:52   #
4
Go to
Feb 10, 2022 06:38:42   #
Pardon my ignorance, but what and where is the ghost imaging?
imagemeister wrote:
Spent 2 1/2 hours late afternoon today at the Owl site/nest. For the first time I saw 2 Owlets - but no decent Image - yet 8-( .... I did see the Owlets stretching/flapping their wings so it will not be long before they branch and fledge !....I did manage to get the male at the nest with one of the Owlets ! 8-) ...

Again, this is with the Sony A99 and Tammy 150-600 G2 set @ 500mm, f6.3, ISO 1600 with 1.6X CIZ and 3 exposure HDR - the mean shutter speed was 1/250 from tripod - so I was pushing the envelope. It was quite WINDY and very LATE in the day today and the image does show some ghost imaging because of this - and there was also some subject movement. So, as a purely photographic image it has some "problems" - but, IMO, as a GRAPHIC representation and the subject matter - it presents well. In hindsight, I should have cranked the ISO to 3200 and gained some shutter speed .....and let the noise fall where it may. I am thinking about noise software as I do not use any now. The Sony A99 was released in 2013 so it is not state of the art regarding noise 8-(

Thanks to ALL for stopping by and to comment ! .....Larry
.
Spent 2 1/2 hours late afternoon today at the Owl ... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 48 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.