Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: Deejaysr2013
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Apr 4, 2013 21:52:52   #
(Photo Gallery)
Challenge: 4/3/13-4/5/13: Critters
Sher wrote:
I love her eyes....


Pookie id a beautiful little critter thank you for posting.
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 21:35:53   #
(Photo Gallery)
Challenge: 4/3/13-4/5/13: Critters
catgirl wrote:
pg 46
Gramps - thats funny but cool

Bushido - like that otter

Deejay - love your rescue I have one also the little Pom? is adorable also

amyinsparta - very nice like the toad


Thank you for your kind words. Where would these beautiful pets be without some one to adopt them and love them. I believe God gave them to us to watch us and be our angels here on earth.
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 16:03:47   #
(Photo Gallery)
Another Go at the Swans
Nightski wrote:
They are, and they are getting used to me now because I have been hunting them down all winter. They are comfortable enought to frolic now. Thanks for you comment. :)


Frollicking with beautiful swans....What fun!!!!!! Wonderful shots and thanks for sharing...
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 15:58:36   #
(Photo Gallery)
West Coast Lighthouses
You done good!!!! I love Lighthouses...Thanks for sharing!!!!
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 15:54:14   #
(Photo Gallery)
The bugs are escaping from....
Dixiegirl wrote:
Well I sure hope so, Angler LOL


Just keep those canons at the ready...lol
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 15:21:36   #
(Photo Gallery)
Poor cat!
tainkc wrote:
I don't know. It's brain is the size of a large marble/


Ah... but not the size of the marble but how far that marble will go...
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 15:15:04   #
(Photo Gallery)
Challenge: 4/3/13-4/5/13: Critters
cricket2 wrote:
great shots, the ball is bigger than that dog - lol - thanks for joining us


yes that is Sandy and not very big but sure loves that ball,lol. Thank you for the warm welcome.
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 15:10:01   #
(Photo Gallery)
Challenge: 4/3/13-4/5/13: Critters
Frankie wrote:
Deejay: Love that rescue pet...I have one of those too...aren't they wonderful. He reminds me of my "Pookie" but he looks quite a bit bigger. Love your shot of the eagles too...I've never see baby eagles before. Thanks for sharing these with us. :thumbup:


my little pup is not very big , just 16 pounds Yorkie/DaschundX. her name is Princess.and thank you for your comments.
Go to
Apr 4, 2013 13:41:16   #
(Photo Gallery)
Challenge: 4/3/13-4/5/13: Critters
my first attempt at critters

playing ball


my little rescued dog


mom eagle and her young

Go to
Apr 1, 2013 23:31:09   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
NIKON beats canon
EstherP wrote:
Really?
I do a lot of babysitting of the under-2-yr-old crowd: When two of the children start fighting over the same toy, I take it away and they each have to go find another toy.
I never want to get involved with this Mine-is-better-than-yours so I ignored both N & C and chose another toy!
EstherP


:thumbup: right on!!!!!!!!!
Go to
Apr 1, 2013 07:37:05   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Manrfotto ART 055 tripod info rquired
Hankwt wrote:
Hi all I have an older Manfrotto ART 055 aluminum tripod does anyone know what the weight capacity is ?? ive searched the manfrotto site but cant seem to find this exact model . This tripod seems quite sturdy - would I gain anything by going to a Carbon Fibre tripod other than the lighter weight ?? Id really like to hear opinions on this tripod Perhaps someone has a link for info as well ?? all i can find online is info on the newer 055 models.


I have a Manfrotto ART 055 with #395 Ball head which I purchased 23 years ago. I have had a Discovery lens attached to my Pentax K1000 film rig which weighed approximately 12.5 lbs . The only problem I had was very windy conditions but the weight of my camera bag was enough to counter the wind. I now use it with my Canon setup and have no problems BUT I am still saving for the new carbon fiber 055 pro as I have mobility problems and the lighter tripod would be advantageous.I hope this helps in some small way.
Go to
Feb 23, 2013 06:29:07   #
(The Attic)
B&H Imposing Religion on Customers
AMAZING !!!!!!! Nuff said!!!!
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 18:53:43   #
(Photo Gallery)
Sea Gull in Flight
SANDYB wrote:
IL86 wrote:
JR1 wrote:
Nice, sharp perfect against blue sky but not a sea gull.

Common gull, there are no sea gulls.

http://www.rspb.org.uk/wildlife/birdguide/families/gulls.aspx


Nice, sharp perfect against blue sky.
I would like to share with you the site I use to identify gulls here in GB. Hope you will find it helpful.
http://www.rspb.org.uk/wildlife/birdguide/families/gulls.aspx

(Or something like that... See the difference?)
Regards.


Thank you for sharing the site, I didn't know there were so many different kinds. I guess if you take a picture of something you should know what it is!!!! Thanks for your interest and help!!!!
quote=IL86 quote=JR1 Nice, sharp perfect against... (show quote)


Nice clear shot of a seagull, we call them seagulls too so I guess we are in error also. A rose by any other name is still a rose, me thinks.Thanks Sandy for sharing.
Go to
Feb 15, 2013 05:27:01   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
Double harness for two cameras
washy wrote:
Has any one used or uses a double harness for two cameras. Any thoughts on which one to buy? Preferably not connecting via the tripod mount, but by the cameras own side attachements.


I own the x-large optech and I find it very comfortable and good price works well...
Go to
Feb 9, 2013 06:10:22   #
(Main Photography Discussion)
This is Bokeh
cjkorb wrote:
GoofyNewfie wrote:
cjkorb wrote:
GoofyNewfie wrote:
cjkorb wrote:
To me, bokeh is just another buzz word that's fashionable to talk about. No matter how you say it...it means D.O.F.!


Yes to the first part.
NO to the second.
At least get it right!
Wow, a little sniffy arn't we? ok... technically, depth of field was sort of a bad term to use. Bokeh is elements of a photograph that is forced out of focus or it depends on whose definition you prefer to use.


I am a newbie and here I thought it was just bad out of focus shots. I just delete those,lol

Your definition has no mention of the aesthetic quality of that out of focus area, which is the key.

Like you, I prefer not to use the word at all. But if you are going to use it, don't put mis-information out there to keep the newbies confused.
quote=cjkorb quote=GoofyNewfie quote=cjkorb To ... (show quote)
You brought up a good point, I certainly don't want to lead newbies down the wrong path. Hey all you newbies... I forgot to mention the aesthetic quality of out of focus areas in bokeh!
quote=GoofyNewfie quote=cjkorb quote=GoofyNewfi... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.