dbfalconer wrote:
A speaker at a recent photo club meeting was describing the importance various redundant backup options. He mentioned that external hard drives (like Seagate and WD) need to be replaced about every 18-24 months.
I understand any such device can fail, and one needs a backup of the backup, so to speak. But I was shocked at his assertion. I keep adding more WD units as my collection grows...but I had not considered constant replacement too. Thoughts? Thanks.
I have quite a few seagates that have been running without problems for more than 10 years. Four of them in a RAID 0+1 group have been running constantly for about 15 years and another two in a RAID 1 array for the same amount of time.