If you want a 70-200 2.8 get the D or AFS lens with two rings one for zoom and one for focus. The slider type is just as good but the ring slides when it hangs down a real pain in the .... neck Don't get the Gelded one.

Sufficient with reasonably good light in the church.

I can't help but wonder what the hidden agenda is that prompts a question like this or the statement that DSLR is dying. I'm 71 FWIW.
As I said in an earlier post I have absolutely NO interest in mirrorless and if my 800 dies, it probably won't, I'd give serious thought to using my F4 full time or the F100 ratherthan getting the overpriced d850 or sucessor, but again never meaning never a mirrorless POC.

Frankly I don't understand the facination/obsession with manual mode. Yes when I started in manual, in the 60-70's with F2-FM-F3 there wasn't a choice but when I got my N70 then F100 I went P and never looked back except when using earlier bodies I still have. Yes, I still shoot film, I consider digital as ok, more immediate and cheaper but for best I still use film. But back to topic in P if you aren't happy with aperature of shutter they can be changed but 99% of the time the camera's correct. I have ASA/ISO set at 100 - 6400 Auto. Not to mention what a blessing autofocus is for 71 year old eyes. So, everybody keeps ranting about the advances in technology and that film is dead blah blah but at the same time extolling a roughly 160 year old method of shooting i.e. shooting manually. Part of this fantastic advance in technology is allowing it to do the work, while keeping an eye on it otherwise why not just use a manual camera? Oh! That's right! Nobody makes a fully manual digital do they? And with the gelded (Ken Rockwell term) lenses you can't shoot a digital in real fully manual mode.

Without electricity it wouldn't be today's world. We'd all be back in the 1800's.
No cars, refrigeration, a/c, personal entertainment in it's many forms, computers/phones in their many forms, etc., etc. Without electricity I'd get out one of my FMs or F2 and take pictures on film ad they work fine without batteries just no meter. Could probably even figure out how to develop the film somehow without electricity probably not easy. I agree most people wouldn't want to live in or lose today's world without electricity, I have no desire to go back to the 1800's or even the early 1900's.

Yay definitely

If you donate you can take a tax writeoff for the value. Kill two birds so to speak. Get a receipt if you can.

That's harsh

I was going to say the same. Lived in central NY south of Utica. Moved to So Cal in 11 to get away from snow/cold. He didn't mention leaving your unlocked car in winter running in the parking lot as you run into the store. Or the people in tanktops, shorts and flipflops walking on snow covered ground anytime it's over 30 degrees in January to April.

Scam!!!!! If not sure call Apple and verify

Number 4 fantastic number 6 good FWIW I'd crop to where the turkey fills the frame pretty much completely.

I see a good technique and talent with a good eye. Keep doing what you're doing.

Peronally I have no interest in mirrorless period. As for 850, true higher mp but Is that really an advantage? You shoot outdoor & landscape & portrait with a D750 which will do everything the D850 will from a practical standpoint. I have a friend that uses a 750 and creates some phenominal pictures. If you're going to blow up really huge maybe but I've blown up to 24x30 from a D300 @12 mp so again really huge... My suggestion is stay with the 750. If you really want a challenge and still do the subjects you like, pick up a medium format and use that. You could buy and develop a lot of film for the cost of an 850 and I've seen many Mamiya's for 3-400 with lens and filmback. Something to think about, at least...

He said in another post he has a D90.

If I was a recognizable face, whether in a crowd or not, and I saw my face on the side of a bus or in a commercial whatever the topic, I'd better have been paid a modeling fee and signed a modeling release. If not I personally would be talking to my lawyer. On the other hand you might get away with it with many people who don't know any better, or are just pleased to see themselves in a picture. But safest to get model release's with a token payment, or use a professional model building a crowd of unrecognizable faces around them as needed. Why take a chance?