You can set up your folders just like you could in Win7.
It's not intuitive because it is unfamiliar - this goes away after awhile.
It's smaller on your drive than Win7
You have all the tools you had in Win7 to modify, edit, make notes, access, look up stuff, download pictures and etc (copy/paste, drag/drop, etc)
Win 10, at least the Pro version, is more secure.
You can use it EXACTLY the way you use Win7.

I have and use both and don't understand your objection other than having a problem with change in general.

I am thinking of trading in my Canon 5D Mark 4 and my L lens for either the new Olympus om-d Mark 3 or the M1X after my trip to Iceland at the end of this month. My hands shake and it's difficult to carry all the equipment. And I really don't like having to add a tripod as well.

Oly's new Mark 3 has a body where some of it is made of plastic; the em1x has no plastic.

I'm interested in among other things the Keystone functionality where it tries to take the place of a tilt-shift lens, which I had in the early days of owning the Canon. Has anyone used Oly's keystone function? Did it work well?

In addition, I created a spreadsheet to see what the weight difference would be between the 5D Mark 4 and the two Olympus models. The m1x with the lenses that correlate the most with the lens that I currently have would weigh more than the 5DM4, but the handheld ability might mitigate blurring due to camera shake.

Oly's Mark 3 weighs less with the associated lens than does the Canon. Unsure what to do but I know I cannot carry all the equipment any more.

I know Canon is coming out with the R5 most likely around July this year. I've read that with the 8k video and the IBIS, it will weigh more than their current mirrorless camera body, the EOS R, which weighs 1.5 lb.

I take landscape, macro, environmental portraits, and travel photos. I am an avid amateur. Never create photographs larger than 8x10. I rented the E-M1X but didn't allo allow enough time to test it.

Any insights regarding the keystone ability specifically or the overall quality of the Olympus cameras would be most appreciated.

In the attached image you can see what appears to be lint in the image in the upper left portion in the sky. I've been mirrorless cameras for over a year now and have noticed that the sensor is very hard to keep clean. I preformed a test using 2 mirrorless cameras and 2 cameras with mirrors. The camera specs were very similar, full frame with the same native resolutions. Each camera used a 300mm telephoto lens. Each camera was set up with aperture priority and an ISO of 400. The dust became noticeable at f-stops f16 and smaller on the mirrorless camera (f-16 thru f-32). The smaller the stop the more noticeable. The mirrored camera were free of any noticeable aberrations. Each lens was cleaned prior to the testing. The mirrorless camera sensors were cleaned according to the manufacturer instructions and then manually cleaned. All the cleaning did was move the aberrations around or even create new ones. Does the mirror protect the sensor in cameras with mirrors? Does the sensor in mirrorless cameras attract dust because of an electrical charge? Has anybody else noticed this issue on their mirrorless cameras? It is usually most noticeable in clear blue sky like the attachment.

I will be presenting a free class on "Understanding and choosing camera shooting modes" on February 25th in Biloxi, Ms. I have done several of classes on different topics and this time I am trying something new. I am posting a link to dropbox that will have the slides that I will use in my presentation with the hopes that it will cut down on the people attending writing as many notes and let them concentrate more on what I am saying. Each of the pages and bullet points and pictures will come up one at a time so we can discuss each one. Check it out and see what you think. Jeff Impey

The presentation can be downloaded from dropbox at the link below if you are interested in looking at it.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/60pzhi1393rksnf/UNDERSTANDING%20AND%20SHOOTING%20CAMERA%20MODES%20%20ORIGINAL%20COPY%20B.key?dl=0

I occasionally show framed bird or wildlife photographs. I like to put a sticker on the back of the frames with image information such as location, image ID, and date and also my contact information.
Does anyone know where I might find some self adhesive labels that are upscale in regards to paper quality... I would like to be able to print some basic information and then write in the image specific data as I have been doing with standard Avery templates which are sized for 6 each on 8.5" by 11" paper.

Thanks in advance to anyone who might assist.

Littlebit, this question has been asked a thousand times here. I don't really know why it's asked so often because it seems pretty obvious to me why FF is better than Crop. FF has a bigger sensor. Simple as that. It's like the old film days - larger film is better. For instance, when I was growing up a lot of small film cameras that were cheap were flooding the market; namely the Kodak 110 film cameras. I had one and I can tell you now, that the 110 film was so inferior to 35mm film that it wasn't even funny. So just think of a FF body with a sensor the same size as 35mm film of old and the crop body as a 110 of old and you've got your comparison. The exception is that most of today's crop sensor cameras are closer to FF than the old 110 film was to 35mm film.

Also, up until recently, all FF camera bodies were built for the professional photographer in that they were built like tanks for the rigors of daily use. Today, because a lot of people asked the same question you're asking, they are building a lot of FF bodies that will produce nice pictures such as the pro bodies, it's just that they aren't built for daily use as "pro" camera bodies are.

Like many fellow uhh'ers I enter a few photo contests in line with my favoured photography subjects, however I recently came across a photo contest which totally baffled me as to the subject matter, this is it below, does anyone have a clue what I should look in my portfolio for??

"Transitions and displacements are the objects of reflection for our call. The concept of the two terms is a recall to the “liquid” vision of contemporary philosophy. Transitions, displacements, mutations of condition are the prerogatives of a fluid approach to reality, prerogatives of a free change in the state of things that allows full organic adherence to the environment and to the context in which each subject / object is immersed . The works that will take part in the exhibition will represent an excursus on the subject, addressed both from a physical, chemical and biological point of view and from a social, cultural and political one"

I have been considering the purchase of a Canon RP camera. While playing with one in the local camera store and turning the power switch to the off position, the auto sensor cleaning symbol shows up on the LCD. I got to thinking about the close proximity of the camera sensor with the rear most lens element. Where does this dust go? Does it find it’s way to the rear element of the attached lens? Not sure how the dust sensor technology works. In the case of the Canon RP I have read some reports that the shutter blades can create some dust.