Posts for: Brucej67
Aug 18, 2012 10:08:21 #
So, I take the picture(s) (in this case 5 for HDR), process them and enhance them and turn it into an image of an oil painting, and what most of you are saying is that I am not a photographer (or not good at taking pictures) and neither am I an artist. Don't figure :cry: Others like my work and buy it, now do they have poor taste, or are they just not enlightened?
For art sake
Aug 15, 2012 07:14:36 #
Had the same experience with PcClean. After loading their software (and it corrupted my computer) they wanted to charge me $200 to remove it and fix my computer. I ended up re-installing the operating system and software I had on it.
Aug 14, 2012 07:52:37 #
Took the shot but can not identify the flower or butterfly, any suggestions?
Flower and Bug
Jul 15, 2012 12:41:19 #
I respectfully disagree; I shot film and slides and developed them myself. The darkroom work was just as creative as the camera work. Today the darkroom is on the computer and it provides the same experience that the film darkroom did.
FLandWVMIKE wrote:
To us, who shot with film, for fifty years and did our composing with the camera, we really had pride in that rare shot, when everything just came out perfect. These photos remain in our mind forever.
I just do not think that you can feel that same satisfaction in a photo that you manipulated with the computer.
I just do not think that you can feel that same satisfaction in a photo that you manipulated with the computer.
Jul 15, 2012 10:37:10 #
I agree and expect more PP controls will eventually wind up in the camera in the future.
MtnMan wrote:
quote=johnske Whether you like/believe in it or ... (show quote)
Jul 15, 2012 06:52:39 #
Side note: I was born in Dalbeattie Scotland. Main topic: I don't think that the software used for PP really makes a difference, it is the fact that PP can be used to enhance, correct or make artwork that will satisfy the individual and perhaps give pleasure to the public viewing the PP photograph that makes the difference. I say there is nothing wrong with PP even in the extreme, take for instance removing phone lines in a landscape, who is to say that is wrong?
artistwally wrote:
quote=omnila Does any still take photos without l... (show quote)
Jul 8, 2012 19:13:44 #
I also have a Nikon D2X, D7000 and D800. Had to sell my first son for the D800 but it was worth it. :mrgreen:
bull drink water wrote:
quote=Brucej67 I own the Sony A700, A850 and A900... (show quote)
Jun 24, 2012 06:17:01 #
While up there try Buttermilk Falls (a little more north of the Delaware Water Gap - see picture). Also Washington's Headquaters and Jocky Hollow in Morristown.
MtnMan wrote:
The Delaware Water Gap is awesome but a little out of your way.
gregr wrote:
Heading to play a round of golf at Ballyowens GC on Sunday. That would be in North Jersey. I was going up a day early and take the camera with me. Any Ida's or locations for shooting?
The Delaware Water Gap is awesome but a little out of your way.
Buttermilk Falls
Washington's Headquarters
Jun 23, 2012 06:59:28 #
In Photoshop if I save my NEAF picture as JPG the EXIF information is still available from the JPG in Opanda IExif.
Nikonian72 wrote:
If you send a raw or TIFF image, the info is contained. If you send a JPG image, chances are info not attached.
Jun 21, 2012 10:41:09 #
If it is the Nikkor 24-70mm F2.8 it costs $1,900 and this is not cheap by my standards.
bkyser wrote:
if it is a kit lens, it would be cheaper to replace.... and be a good guy and don't sell a faulty lens on ebay.
If it is an expensive lens, then yes, send it in.
If it is an expensive lens, then yes, send it in.
Jun 21, 2012 06:05:03 #
Not an expert on this, but is the moisture inside the lens one of the way fungus starts?
Jun 10, 2012 13:31:19 #
Well there you go, couldn't be any good it has the "C" word in it and doesn't start with "N". :lol:
peggyjom wrote:
One of the best I learned from was micheal the maven. It can be found on the web he has home work available too. As well as a blog I bought the cd for my camera he is a canon guy.
Jun 10, 2012 13:15:11 #
http://kelbytraining.com/online/courses/
nubbins wrote:
gdwsr- Where would I find these Kelby lessons? Is there a website to go to?
Jun 10, 2012 06:00:16 #
I did buy it and there was some good information on it, however you can get the same from a book or sometimes the internet (internet advice is not always reliable). I am a visual learner rather than read and learn, that is why I purchased this set of DVD's. There are practice (or lab) sessions on the DVD's that make learning easier.
Dtil2012 wrote:
this was on Cambridge page. It is a DVD by Vince Wallace...Learn and Master Photography. let me know if its worth the $149.00
Jun 6, 2012 13:24:15 #
We are saying the same thing; the only difference between the FX on the DX is the MM. I prefer on my D7000 to have a lens that matches the format and on my D800 a lens that matches that format in MM, giving me an equal spread on both cameras.
Lucian wrote:
ummm no. From what I understand the 70-200mm VR f2.8 is not a DX lens and will work fine on both full frame a DX camera bodies. Albeit with different mm ranges in the lens between full and DX of course.