Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Notorious T.O.D.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 ... 279 next>>
Oct 9, 2017 06:09:45   #
Nations Photo on the internet...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 9, 2017 05:50:19   #
Indoors a good starting point would be 1/125, f/5.6 at ISO 200. That generally will eliminate all ambient light and you will be shooting with strobe light only. Adjust ambient light levels from there.

I agree that your flash is not firing at the correct time as others have stated.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 16:43:23   #
Bora Bora beats Tora Bora...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 12:58:08   #
Gene51 wrote:
The back of the admission ticket often has language to the effect that you surrender any right to privacy, and in purchasing the ticket you agree. This is fairly commonplace.


Gene, I could see that being used. But many drag racing events I attend use wrist bands and not tickets...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 10:16:19   #
I should have been more precise in saying the 70-200 is internal zoom, the overall lens length does not change. The 100-400 II is external zoom and gets longer or shorter as you zoom. I just find I prefer internal zoom if possible. Both are excellent lenses though.

Best,
Todd Ferguson

pithydoug wrote:
Not sure what you mean by the length changes as one zooms? It is after all a zoom lens which is it's strength and no sarcasm meant. I toyed with 70-200 but it just did not give me the reach for birds, animals in general and for the few times I need 2.8 I'll kick the ISO up.

I have some 16X24 and bigger and the quality is not just good but excellent.
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 09:18:46   #
I am not a Lawyer but I call BS on a lot of this release stuff. At the races cars, drivers and even spectators get their photos taken and published in magazines for profit and for promotional flyers and I have never seen any photographer ask anyone to sign a release. Many of these photographers make their living or part of their living from shooting these events. So, I would think they know what is required.

If someone shoved a release in my face when I was out and about I would probably tell them to get lost. Maybe I am missing something, but based on experience I think this release issue gets blown way out of proportion.

Best,
Todd Ferguson

boberic wrote:
If the photo will be used for commercial purposes you will need a release form. Google photo release form and print out a bunch of them. Be sure to keep signed copies
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 09:08:33   #
Haydon wrote:
Because I trust my own work more than a program. It's a control thing :)




Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 08:56:35   #
I have the lens and the 2.0 TC III. I don't have the 1.4 TC at this point. I feel I get good results with the 2.0. Especially if using for online viewing and not making giant prints. I am not sure I am smart enough to do a careful and thoughtful comparison to the 100-400 II if I had one. I know it is a great lens but I don't care for the length changes as one zooms...a compromise that is there I guess.

I have a friend, Tara, that shoots the 100-400 II on her 5D3 a lot. You can see her images on Facebook at Black Rock Photography. She loves the lens.

I like my combination as I can get out past 200mm but can shoot indoors with the smaller 70-200. If you want to try it all out, get the stuff from someone like B&H where you can return it if it is not what you desire.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 08:31:04   #
Just recently had FedEx deliver a 84x20x8 inch package worth $5,000 to Texas instead of Michigan. Crew at local FedEx messed up the address with some other packages. Fortunately the fellow who received it was honest and FedEx was able to pick it up and deliver it to Michigan...although a week late. And they charged us for the reshipment. So, we still are protesting that. Also, you cannot insure a package of that value with FedEx so it was a little dicey for a couple days... Problem is they hire people who don't care and take care at too many places today. At least with their tracking we knew where they delivered it...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 8, 2017 08:11:54   #
Wrong, and how or what people want to spend their money on is their business. I know people that spend $30-$40K on a weekend of racing. Their money, their business!

Best,
Todd Ferguson

Quinn 4 wrote:
$1,000 for a camera body. I want a camera that will hold it value not 5 years but 10 years from now. Will it still be working right after 10 years of use? What I am seeing and reading I don't think digital cameras can do that, after two years their are totally obsolete and your $1000 is in the wind. People stop and read what you are writing $1,000 ,$3000, $4000 just for a camera body. Add $2000 or more for a lens. How are you paying for all of this? One end up paying off for item that has become obsolete. If that is not nuts I don't known what is.
$1,000 for a camera body. I want a camera that wil... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 7, 2017 22:16:04   #
Download the manual and start learning... The Nikon menu system and terms are probably different from what you are used to with Canon.

Best,
Todd Ferguson


vininnj2u wrote:
I have to wait about one month for my Nikon D850 to come in. I have switched from Canon and I realize there is going to be a great new learning curve using the Nikon. I have read various articles and sites, but what I am looking for are Pros and cons, likes and dislikes of the D850 from people who actual own the camera and have used it in various ways. Thanks. Vince.
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 17:05:35   #
Really Right Stuff is right there with Gitzo.
There is information on selecting a proper tripod on the RRS website too...

Best,
Todd Ferguson

BlueMorel wrote:
Thanks for the great detailed tips from everyone. I'm not upgrading to much heavier lenses like the OP plans on doing, though I plan on adding a 70-250 telephoto sometime before our next vacation in April. Mostly I would be looking for the stability, stability, stability, and reliability. Sounds like Gitzo is the one to beat. A bit more expensive but not that much more. Good tip about carbon fiber and vibration. I have experience with the clamp-type leg adjusters. My old tripod has stiff ones and as I get older the screw type like Gitzo's seems more and more appealing. Mine is over 40 years old and the clamps show no signs of failing but the adjustment screws aren't as tight as they should be, and that's where the age is showing. Many of the fitting holes are getting worn (aluminum I think).
Thanks for the great detailed tips from everyone. ... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 6, 2017 10:48:37   #
I have been very happy with my Really Right Stuff tripod, 34 series. A Ball Head is OK with smaller lenses but you have to guard against them allowing the camera to flop around quickly or unexpectedly when making adjustments. I do have a Sirui K40 ball head listed in the Hog classified section. It is a decent ball head for the money.

Personally if you are going with larger and heavier lenses then a pano gimbal instead of ball head. I generally prefer to use my pano gimbal with smaller lenses such as my 24-70 and 70-200 including in studio work. I think RRS and Wimberly make very good pano gimbals. There may be others that are less expensive but I don't have personal experience with those. If you are going to put $5-$10K or more of gear on a tripod you don't want a less than sturdy and robust support system. To do otherwise would just be foolish in my view.

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 09:38:10   #
Sharpies are far from permanent in my experience...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Oct 5, 2017 09:12:08   #
Hmmmmmmm, so the 20M watt second flash I am building is not going to allow me to bounce off clouds. Is that what you all are telling me...

Really the bounce card for catch light might make the most sense. Experience and experimentation would rule the day...

Best,
Todd Ferguson
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 ... 279 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.