Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: CanonTom
Oct 22, 2019 18:41:48 #
JoeJoe wrote:
Right first time... I am 6'2" so stood 2 steps down at her shoulder height....
Oct 22, 2019 10:28:14 #
Toe placement? I expect she had to place her feet and toes in whatever manner it took to maintain that lovely pose. She had to balance or possibly fall through the window. I like the shot.
Oct 22, 2019 10:21:53 #
JoeJoe wrote:
on the landing natural light
Beautiful, I really like the shot....but......appears to be on a balcony and it would seem you were standing in the air out front. Where were you standing? Or how did you get the camera into its position and shoot this?
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Oct 10, 2019 08:51:34 #
foxfirerodandgun wrote:
I have been asked to take pictures of a wedding re... (show quote)
Sorry but does not sound promising with what you list for equipt. If nothing else think of buying or renting or borrowing a nifty fifty. Not very expensive and will give you f 1.8, which without a flash you are likely to need. You will likely need either f 1.8 or f 2.8 to get these shots if you are not using a flash. Frankly I would consider flash unless not allowed for whatever reason. Good luck!
Oct 9, 2019 08:39:50 #
Beautiful shot!
Sep 30, 2019 12:35:59 #
MrBob wrote:
Creek on Chinnabee Silent trail. Located at Chinnabee recreation area at Mt. Cheah, highest point in Alabama.
Beautiful Bob! BTW, I hiked the Silent trail about 25 years ago when my sun was in Boy Scouts. Beginning at Lake Chinnabee, how far along the trail is it before coming to this creek? Would love seeing it and photographing it again. Approx. when was this photo taken?
Thanks, Tom
Sep 28, 2019 08:53:48 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Should you be looking at a 100-400L II or a prime lens rather than a camera?
You will get more bang for the buck with the best lenses before you worry about a body upgrade. Quality L series lenses will last a lifetime.
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Sep 26, 2019 08:42:12 #
Paul, as always your shots are terrific! I do have one question.......what shutter speed do you feel is optimum for stopping movement of the aircraft but allowing the propeller to show that is is spinning?
Sep 10, 2019 08:44:06 #
Wonderful geography lesson and beautiful pictures. I really enjoyed these! Thanks for sharing.
Sep 7, 2019 09:22:09 #
Watching.
Aug 23, 2019 08:05:15 #
Regis wrote:
I'm a 75 year old average built man. More than 7 years of hand-holding my shots (no tripod) has strengthened my wrists and hands.
Guess I need to use larger lenses more often!
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Aug 23, 2019 08:00:06 #
Regis you must have the steadiest hands on earth! Great shot as yours always are. Perhaps you are a surgeon?
Aug 18, 2019 11:21:41 #
LFingar wrote:
Here are a couple of reviews for you:
https://kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/10-18mm.htm
https://kenrockwell.com/canon/1022.htm
It would appear that the 10-18 is actually the better lens based on these reviews.
BTW, I would consider leaving the 70-300 home.
https://kenrockwell.com/canon/lenses/10-18mm.htm
https://kenrockwell.com/canon/1022.htm
It would appear that the 10-18 is actually the better lens based on these reviews.
BTW, I would consider leaving the 70-300 home.
I have the 10-18. Plastic but who cares? Just be careful with it. Inexpensive and the Image quality is extremely good.
Aug 17, 2019 09:27:25 #
dsmeltz wrote:
"better lens on the Sony"?
Hunnnh? The wide end of this lens is a 24mm equiv field of view. Forget about interior shots of great buildings unless you like stitching. What, exactly, makes you think this is a better lens to the extent that you can just throw it out as an accepted assumption? It ain't.
Take the 24-105 and a wide angle zoom. Even the inexpensive 10-18 will serve you well.
Hunnnh? The wide end of this lens is a 24mm equiv field of view. Forget about interior shots of great buildings unless you like stitching. What, exactly, makes you think this is a better lens to the extent that you can just throw it out as an accepted assumption? It ain't.
Take the 24-105 and a wide angle zoom. Even the inexpensive 10-18 will serve you well.
I have both the 10-18 and the 24 prime Canon lenses previously mentioned. They will supplement your 24-105 and they weigh virtually nothing. Image quality of both is outstanding.....read the reviews.
Aug 16, 2019 08:28:41 #
taffthetooth wrote:
Had a go at aircraft passing the moon last night with no luck, so tried a shot of Saturn. Not a great shot, but it is 1,380,645,646 kilometers away! Olympus EM-1 MK11 with the 300mm F4 and 1.4 extender, F8 at 1/20 sec and ISO 200.
It is indeed a long way off and not nearly so bright as many objects in the sky. I would have thought a longer exposure would have been required..........good shot though.
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.