Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: davejann
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Oct 10, 2013 08:39:45   #
*Congressional Reform Act of 2013

1. No Tenure / No Pension.

A Congressman/woman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they're out of office.


2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.

All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.


3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.


4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.


5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.


6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.


7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen/women are void effective 12/31/13. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women.


Congressmen/women made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.


If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people then it will only take three days for most people (in the U.S. ) to receive the message. Don't you think it's time?


THIS IS HOW YOU FIX CONGRESS!

If you agree with the above, pass it on. If not, just delete.
You are one of my 20+
Please keep it going.
Go to
Jan 4, 2013 12:51:54   #
Two quick points : there are no beans in Texas Chili, the Chili goes on the the beans for the tender feet.

The other is I am not allowed to make chili for my family any more. Probably would have come as "moderate with well balanced heat and flavor complexity but not really hot enough?
Go to
Nov 24, 2012 12:15:19   #
And on that day so long ago, just who were the Undocumented Aliens?

Dave
Go to
Sep 29, 2012 17:47:35   #
jcontreras wrote:
I found that by facing 90 degrees from the centerline and leaning the opposite direction of the ship's roll you can remain fairly stable - don't brace against anything as it will impart the vibrations to you. I guess getting your sealegs is imperative! This advice is based on my 30 years in the U.S. Navy.


On naval ships, the surgical operating room is usually placed at the center of both roll and pitch. That is usually buried in the middle of the ship but some place topside from that "center" might be your best bet. Somebody in the crew should be able to help you.

Dave
Go to
Sep 28, 2012 21:03:40   #
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 24, 2012 14:36:23   #
First a general but sincere "Thank you" to every one. The drawing was more than adequate and helpful. The suggestion to usse paste wax to dull out shiny places is priceless and would never be found in a textbook.

One of the problems with this shoot is that this bed, a family heirloom ended up with us since we had the only available space that could remotely accommodate it. It is over 150 years old and was designed for a time when high ceilings (even our 10' ceiling fall about 4'short of the full height). I was able to accommodate this by hanging the top medallion from the ceiling by a small hook. It leaves the medallion a bit low but, so far, no one has note=iced it.

I have only seen three like it-this one, one in another, distant branch of the family and the one in the Smithsonian, which is the least well preserved of the three.

The object of these photos will be to sell the bed and matching dressing table so that we can share the proceeds with the family. Also, my wife and I would like to have images to remind us this set that has lived with us for about 25 years
Go to
Sep 23, 2012 18:56:56   #
RixPix wrote:
Joyfullee wrote:
RixPix wrote:
Bmac wrote:
RixPix wrote:
Joyfullee wrote:
Excerpt:

"A New Jersey Imam has come out in support of disregarding the U.S. Constitution in favor of instituting Sharia law."

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/09/us-imam-disregard-first-amendment-replace-with-sharia/


That's Jersey for you...always the drama queen.


Now aren't you calling the kettle black. :hunf:


I am guessing you get that remark a lot considering how pot shaped you seem to be :}
quote=Bmac quote=RixPix quote=Joyfullee Excerpt... (show quote)


It appears from your remarks that you are not only lacking in what's going on in our country, but class as well.
quote=RixPix quote=Bmac quote=RixPix quote=Joy... (show quote)


Listen you idiots that post this kind of crap don't deserve any respect. If you had one sliver of knowledge of the actual workings of the government you would not even bother reading this dribble. It is published strictly for the least informed and since someone here has seen fit to post a link to it that person is either a mentally deficient moron or a right-wing, neo-con, paid poster.

If you had any idea of the process necessary to change even one word in the Constitution then you would be laughing at the morons spreading this idle gossip. I mean really. are you a bunch of women under the dryers down at the beauty salon? I ask that ladies because that is exactly what you are acting like.

Now go...do a little research on the process of amending the US Constitution and give a 500 word summary of the process and the pros and cons of the process. I can do that I had that in college where I studied political science in fact I might even have typed double-spaced around here somewhere and that was 30 years ago.
quote=Joyfullee quote=RixPix quote=Bmac quote=... (show quote)


That would be all well and good if they really wanted to change the constitution. But it would seem that they want to destroy it. I don't think that political science is their preferred tool.

Dave
Go to
Sep 23, 2012 18:56:42   #
RixPix wrote:
Joyfullee wrote:
RixPix wrote:
Bmac wrote:
RixPix wrote:
Joyfullee wrote:
Excerpt:

"A New Jersey Imam has come out in support of disregarding the U.S. Constitution in favor of instituting Sharia law."

http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/09/us-imam-disregard-first-amendment-replace-with-sharia/


That's Jersey for you...always the drama queen.


Now aren't you calling the kettle black. :hunf:


I am guessing you get that remark a lot considering how pot shaped you seem to be :}
quote=Bmac quote=RixPix quote=Joyfullee Excerpt... (show quote)


It appears from your remarks that you are not only lacking in what's going on in our country, but class as well.
quote=RixPix quote=Bmac quote=RixPix quote=Joy... (show quote)


Listen you idiots that post this kind of crap don't deserve any respect. If you had one sliver of knowledge of the actual workings of the government you would not even bother reading this dribble. It is published strictly for the least informed and since someone here has seen fit to post a link to it that person is either a mentally deficient moron or a right-wing, neo-con, paid poster.

If you had any idea of the process necessary to change even one word in the Constitution then you would be laughing at the morons spreading this idle gossip. I mean really. are you a bunch of women under the dryers down at the beauty salon? I ask that ladies because that is exactly what you are acting like.

Now go...do a little research on the process of amending the US Constitution and give a 500 word summary of the process and the pros and cons of the process. I can do that I had that in college where I studied political science in fact I might even have typed double-spaced around here somewhere and that was 30 years ago.
quote=Joyfullee quote=RixPix quote=Bmac quote=... (show quote)


That would be all well and good if they really wanted to change the constitution. But it would seem that they want to destroy it. I don't think that political science is their preferred tool.

Dave
Go to
Sep 23, 2012 16:17:58   #
We have an antique bed which I need to photograph. This thing is huge and, therefore, must be shot where it stands. It in crammed into a smallish bedroom and the natural lighting is not the best. So, what I would like is some ideas for lighting and angles. The wood is dark and may be a bit reflective. There is also a matching dressing table with a mirror in the same room which is its own problem.

My kit should support most ideas that you folks might offer-5D mkII, wide angle lenses, and an assortment of lighting equipment.

Thanks in advance.

Dave
Go to
Sep 22, 2012 15:51:47   #
I use the smallest Think Tank roller since at my age, I have some difficulty carrying a bag large enough to hold my kit.

Dave
Go to
Sep 2, 2012 18:28:17   #
Croce wrote:
ted45 wrote:
tschmath wrote:
handgunner wrote:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This is from the Connecticut Constitution: Connecticut: Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state (1818).

If you had a chance to reword the Second Ammendment , what would it say?


I like the way the Connecticut law is written. It allows for sensible control of guns and ammunition and prevents the state from outlawing all guns. Banning military style guns and large magazines, as well as armor piercing bullets, is a sensible way to limit gun violence without taking away everyone's guns.
quote=handgunner A well regulated Militia, being ... (show quote)


I agree that there is no reason to allow full-jacket ammo for any civilian gun. However, "military style" is a little too vague to be the basis of a ban. I was at a gun show last week and saw a lot of "military style" guns that were just old fashioned semi-auto rifles with a lot of crap added on to make them look "cool". It was mostly the young guys looking at them but very few people were actually buying.

As far as large magazines go: I saw a guy in Kentucky a few years ago load and fire a bolt action Remington faster than his partner armed with a civilian version of the AR15. The proficiency of the shooter was more important than the size of the magazine. In fact large magazines were never a big seller until the talk about banning them started.
quote=tschmath quote=handgunner A well regulated... (show quote)


The reason military ammo is, by Geneva Convention rules, restricted to FMJ is because FMJ is not as fatal or maiming a round as soft nose, hollow point, etc type bullets. There is an attendant reason to that also. It takes 5 to 7 people dependent on location and condition to care for 1 wounded, thereby removing more people from actual combat. Killing, removes one.
quote=ted45 quote=tschmath quote=handgunner A w... (show quote)


I agree except that the actual depth of the medical support triange is much larger than that.

Dave
Go to
Sep 2, 2012 18:25:11   #
handgunner wrote:
Ol' Frank... I like the 1911 too. I don't have a Colt in that model but i do have three Custom Kimber's. My favorite is my Grand Raptor.

Back to the subject of the Second Ammendment, here is ann atricle written in 1788 on the definition of "Militia".

http://www.constitution.org/mil/cs_milit.htm


I particularly liked the quote from Solzhenitsyn.

For me, my Glock 30 w/2 extra mags and my old Rem 870 w/"deer barrel" for back up constitute my militia gear.

Dpn't forget your high intensity flash:)

Dave
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 21:16:09   #
greymatter wrote:
What did he prove? Have Christians never behaved violently? Constantine conquered with symbol of the cross, the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, Salem witch trials, slavery was justified using the Bible... The Old Testament is full of violence


That is true. What is also true is that eventually christians identified that behavior as bad and dealt with it. To me, the failure, over the centuries, for them to see these things as wrong and to try to deal with it, is the base problem. As it is the code is as long as you don't do these bad things to Muslims, at least those you don't consider heretics, you are good to go.

Dave
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 18:31:39   #
handgunner wrote:
1. If it ain't broke don't fix it.
2. If it is broke, don't try to fix it yourself. Take it to someone who knows how to fix it. It will cost you twice as much to repair what you already fixed.

** Did you ever take somethimg apart that didn't work only to put it back together without fixing anything and have it work perfectly?
** You only need three things in a home tool box: a hammer, a roll of duct tape, and a six pack of beer.
** Did you ever notice how many friends you have when you own a pickup truck? Seems like the only time they come around is when they want to move. "Golden Rule: I drive the truck. You move the furniture".
1. If it ain't broke don't fix it. br 2. If it is ... (show quote)

Amen Brother

Dave
Go to
Aug 28, 2012 18:25:11   #
donrent wrote:
Allen West is a VERY informed person and extremly intelligent... I've seen him respond to similar situations with the same amount of knowledge...


On another note, if in any other group, a significant sub-group began to behave in the same uncivilized way that the Islamic militants have done, the main stream of the group would erupt into protest over the harm to their reputation if not for shame of the absolute wrongness of that behavior.

I am still waiting for something more vigorous than some clucking into well stroked beards.

Dave
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.