Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 next>>
Jul 23, 2013 06:02:57   #
haroldross wrote:
This debate goes on and on. Here is an example of why I shoot in RAW. I love the long lens on the SX50 but when I go above ISO 300, the picture becomes soft until around ISO 800 where there is noise to be dealt with.

In this example, it was taken at full telephoto (just optical zoom), ISO 80, 1/200 shutter, and f/8. F/8 seems to be the sweet spot of the SX50's lens at full telephoto. I find that I get much better results if I take a photo at a lower ISO and adjust the exposure of the RAW photo. The JPG from the adjusted RAW file is on the left and the camera processed JPG is on the right.
This debate goes on and on. Here is an example of ... (show quote)


That is one reason I shoot Raw if it is available.

Raw is equivalent to negative film regarding latitude where as jpeg is like slide film.

Another reason I shoot raw is I enjoy the post processing. Good images only start in the camera. The computer is as important as the camera.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 05:40:43   #
grusum wrote:
Betcha it doesn't have the latest Nvidia driver and computers come not tweaked for optimum performance but optimum compatibility (lowest common denominator).

Manufacturers do not want product returns so they make them "work" to satisfy as broad a base of people as they can. Doesn't make geeks happy but satisfies the common masses.

Here's mine from an AMD Phenom II X6 Black 1100T Unlocked processor with 6 core 3.3 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM, 240GB SSD, and a Nvidia FeForce GTS450 vid card.

Mine is tweaked and adjusted for max performance but is not the latest and greatest hardware - couple years old but still works faster than this old man can think...

Check your drivers and google for Windows 7 tweaks; if and only if your competent to make system changes, otherwise . . .
Betcha it doesn't have the latest Nvidia driver an... (show quote)


Here is my i7.


Go to
Jul 22, 2013 16:09:57   #
rasputin1943 wrote:
I was defending you about what JR1 said about your spelling of lens (lense). He then made the mistake with his spelling of it's when it should have been its.


Coming from pbase I thought this forum was an improvement. I can see that it is just as petty.
Go to
Jul 22, 2013 08:54:38   #
RedArrow wrote:
Once a year I work 4 long days taking photos for a very close friend for her recital book. We take about 1500 pictures and work it down to a 150 for the book. I am going to retire the D90 and buy a D800e for next year. Please feel free to C&C.


You are like a farmer: Outstanding in your field.
Go to
Jul 22, 2013 08:46:37   #
josemann wrote:
My wife and my daughter in front of the moon


Both are very nice. I especially like the second one. It actually looks as if she was illuminated by the moon.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 23:33:55   #
RaydancePhoto wrote:
Ok guys, A little advice on getting a decent used full frame camera. I have been asked to take photos of real estate locally by our largest realtor, I will need an 11mm lens and a FF camera. I don't have the bucks to buy the Sony A99 (my preference) so I need to get something more affordable, around 1000.00. Used Nikon, Canon or any would be ok,but do want the best bang for the buck. I will be shooting indoors so the better the low light capability the better.


It appears that your real estate agent doesn't know his blankity blank from a hole in the ground. There are many options.

Try a stitching program. I took this hand held standing in my drive way. With a little practice you will blow them away.


Go to
Jul 21, 2013 23:04:34   #
chaser48 wrote:
Trying to fine tune the fur..........too hot that day for a "good" hair day :-)


Another tree rat.


Go to
Jul 21, 2013 22:58:26   #
sevendog wrote:
One of our dogs on a hike a couple days ago.


I like.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 22:48:38   #
BrentHarder wrote:
Since the waves were less than ideal for surfing, I was forced to look for other photo opportunities. These 3 girls walking along the beach made for an interesting composition in my opinion.


Nice! And the image is good too.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 22:42:39   #
Coolcameragirl wrote:
Out looking for really small bugs, spiders - macro subjects, and these two flew in.


Great detail CCG.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 08:21:59   #
RickH wrote:
For a month or so I've been learning to use a new Nikon lens, a 70-200mm. I'm beginning to suspect that when the vibration reduction is set to on that I get slightly off focus results (with auto-focus, no problem with manual). Does this ring true for others? I have the lens on a 800E


The resolution of your sensor makes small issues larger. If manual focus is good and auto focus is off it needs to be calibrated. You can send the combination off to Nikon or do it yourself. When on a tripod turn off the VR.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 08:05:23   #
Screamin Scott wrote:
I've got the 2 ring D ED version (not AFs) & love it...Shot this with it...


Good detail on the Red-bellied Woodpecker.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 08:03:05   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
I've already posed the question to MTShooter...

Curious how many have used this older Nikkor lens on their DSLRs,

It seems like an affordable compromise to the 70-200. Of course, it doesn't have VR. I tested two at a local brick and mortar. It is slightly slower on the AF response.

Comments/ images are welcome


One of the sharpest lens I used was a Nikon 400MM f5.6 manual focus.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 07:55:42   #
rheat56 wrote:
Tamron AF18-270
Dose anyone have this lens ? and is it a good lens? and how do you like it?? Thank you for your replies Have a great day!!


The range makes it very convenient if you can live with the optical performance.
Go to
Jul 21, 2013 07:44:59   #
tc71 wrote:
I am going to get a new PC soon. I will use it for mainly editing pictures and video. I would greatly appreciate any input from anyone as to what some good editing programs are and what operating system would work better, (AMD vs Intel) or anything else I should look for when buying my PC. I am hoping to spend less than $800. Thank You


I recently put together a power house at CyberpowerPC out of California. You can spec out any thing you desire. You won't have any money left over for editing software so go with the free stuff.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.