Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
comparison of mirror-less camera systems
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Nov 16, 2014 07:46:08   #
lfleischer1 Loc: Garrison, NY
 
josephnl wrote:
I recently bought a Sony Alpha a6000 after watching several reviews on YouTube. The reviews sold me, and I love my a6000. It's a lot of camera for the price. Suggest you watch a few of the video reviews...starting with this one.
http://youtu.be/0-68Owv7Zt8


I second this opinion. The a600 is an exellent camera. If you want the best lenses for it you have to shell out some serious bucks though. But the results are worth it.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 08:11:58   #
sueyeisert Loc: New Jersey
 
I would wait for the Xpro2.
dkeysser wrote:
I want to pick a new system, mirror-less, interchangeable lenses, best possible image quality, mostly for nature and landscape (travel), and some photo-journalism. I am down to the Samsung NEX300 and the Fuji Pro-X1. Both have APS-C sensors (should be better than MFT?) and interchangeable lenses. If you ignore the price difference, what do you think?

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 08:12:01   #
jwt Loc: Texas Hill Country
 
I shoot with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 and Panasonic lenses and Panasonic automatic extension tubes. Granted this is not the top end Panasonic Lumix; having said that I feel its a terrific little camera and the price compared to some of the others including the high end ones from Panasonic makes it a really great camera for nature photography including birds, landscape photography and close up photography and I don't get tired lugging it around as I used to with the SLR's and heavy lenses.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2014 08:17:52   #
Slick Willie Loc: The U. S.
 
dkeysser wrote:
I want to pick a new system, mirror-less, interchangeable lenses, best possible image quality, mostly for nature and landscape (travel), and some photo-journalism. I am down to the Samsung NEX300 and the Fuji Pro-X1. Both have APS-C sensors (should be better than MFT?) and interchangeable lenses. If you ignore the price difference, what do you think?


If you're looking for performance & price:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=up8K_xd_iwU

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 08:28:45   #
ottopj Loc: Annapolis, MD USA
 
dkeysser wrote:
Good point, but I am starting from scratch. I have several other systems, including a Nikon D7100 and several DX lenses, but I want to small portable lightweight (but high quality) mirror-less system to complement the Nikon. I also have a Sony RX100m3, which is superb, not limited in its scope.


From what I've heard, seen and read, those that have gotten a mirrorless to "compliment" their current system, many have gone on to use the mirrorless system almost exclusively.

For $1800 on Amazon you can get a used Sony A7 and a used Sony Sonnar 55mm f/1.8. The A7 has about 24.3 MP.

Worth entertaining the thought. Sell your old stuff and off you go.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 08:39:37   #
AntonioReyna Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
I am a Canon DSLR guy but I bought a NEX-6, with the super small 16-50z lens and I love it. The image quality and colors are great. It is my walkaround combo but I am not going to invest too much in the system, perhaps the new 18-105/f4 zoom as I still use the Canon for important stuff. I was in the Sony store in Costa Mesa and it was great to see all their bodies and lenses in one place.

josephnl wrote:
I recently bought a Sony Alpha a6000 after watching several reviews on YouTube. The reviews sold me, and I love my a6000. It's a lot of camera for the price. Suggest you watch a few of the video reviews...starting with this one.
http://youtu.be/0-68Owv7Zt8

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 09:14:40   #
rvenn
 
I defer totally to the pros here, but I am curious as to why I have never seen even a mention of the Nikon 1 V2 or V3 cameras and lenses. Is the Nikon mirrorless system just not up to the competition?

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2014 10:17:23   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
rvenn wrote:
I defer totally to the pros here, but I am curious as to why I have never seen even a mention of the Nikon 1 V2 or V3 cameras and lenses. Is the Nikon mirrorless system just not up to the competition?


It's just ok. The others are far superior. Same for the canon m.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 10:21:38   #
rudyp16 Loc: Toms River, NJ
 
Love the Oly e-mi. Sold my D7100 and a slew of pro lenses to switch to the m1. Limited in lenses however the ones available are exceptional. Waiting for the 40-150 2.8 which is 80-300 2.8. Early reviews are stellar.

They are alo comimg out with a pro wide angle and 400 mm f4 lens.

Check it out.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 11:20:57   #
Desert Gecko Loc: desert southwest, USA
 
Sony's a7r is down to $2k for body only, very reasonable for a full frame (compare that to Canon's 5diii or a Nikon fx). Add about $300 for a Sony adapter to use your favorite flavor of foreign lenses with full electronic control until you gear up with native glass. Note that because the a7 cameras are mirrorless, there is plenty of room to adapt lenses to the proper distance from the sensor plane.

Sony has much to offer in mirrorless and more on the horizon. As others have said, the a6000 perhaps can't be beat bang-for-the-buck, and the a7s can record 4k video in candlelight. Darn near night vision, that thing, with unbeatable ISO. Read about future prospects at www.sonyalpharumors.com, and keep looking until February's big Japan camera show when Sony is expected to unveil something big. When I make the switch it will surely be to Sony mirrorless (and one day we all will switch because mirrorless is the future, despite what naysayers will say, not unlike a few years ago when some said digital would never take over film.)

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 11:34:29   #
Kingmapix Loc: Mesa, Arizona
 
rpavich wrote:
The X-Pro1 is getting a bit long in the tooth and and you can do better if you desire to stick with the X-Camera system.

The X-T1 is the flagship right now and I hear a rumble about the X-Pro2 coming out in 2015.

The X-T1 is a great camera...top notch. I have no experience with any other mirrorless system.


The Fujifilm X-E2 has the same sensor system as the X-T1.
Much less expensive and lighter in weight.

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2014 11:58:49   #
WereWolf1967 Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
dkeysser wrote:
Good point, but I am starting from scratch. I have several other systems, including a Nikon D7100 and several DX lenses, but I want to small portable lightweight (but high quality) mirror-less system to complement the Nikon. I also have a Sony RX100m3, which is superb, not limited in its scope.


I've owned the Fuji X-Pro 1 for several years now and it's a wonderful camera system. I have the EX20 (small bounce flash) for it as well as the much more powerful EF42. The 42 is a large flash for this size camera system but when you need a lot of light, this will deliver. I also have the 18 mm f/2, the 34 mm f/1.4 and the 18~55 wide to tele zoom. After using the 60 mm macro and the 55~200 zoom lenses, I got rid of both. They just didn't feel good on this body. I very seldom if ever remove the 18~55 lens anymore because it covers 90%+ of anything I need to shoot. This is not a featherweight camera by the way. It feels about as robust as an "M" series Leica. Pics are also excellent. I do not post process any of my shots. I've always shot "Chromes" and for better or worse, what I see is what I shot. I'm very old school about that.

I also have a Fuji X 20 to carry around and use it more than the X-Pro 1.
I also use my Leica D-Lux 5 & 6 cameras along with my V-Lux 2 bridge camera. For 4/3 rds I use my trusty Leica Digilux 3 with the wonderful Leica Vario Elmar 14~50 mm f/2.8~3.5 lens. This is a Moose of a camera but for big hands like mine, it's perfect. My main Digital cameras are my Nikon D1X with updates by Nikon and a D2X with updates. My newest baby is a black Df full frame Nikon. I have used Nikon AF equipment so I gave amassed quite a few "D-series" full frame AF Nikkor lenses so I'm pretty much set-up for the full frame digital.

I know I got off question but I hope the actual answer of the X-Pro 1 system helped. Good luck.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 12:13:12   #
SirLan Loc: London UK
 
dkeysser wrote:
I want to pick a new system, mirror-less, interchangeable lenses, best possible image quality, mostly for nature and landscape (travel), and some photo-journalism. I am down to the Samsung NEX300 and the Fuji Pro-X1. Both have APS-C sensors (should be better than MFT?) and interchangeable lenses. If you ignore the price difference, what do you think?


In first place is Panasonic GH4...the best camera out there. The plus points are very fast focus...all over touch sensitive rear screen which is so useful. Superb quality in every area and then 4K video...a fantastic stills camera too. One negative being no in body stabilization which is in the Panasonic lenses. Maybe price too?
In second place is joint between...Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Sony A6000.
Olympus OM-D E-M1 has in body stabilization and is great overall camera.. Price high like Panasonic GH4 but both are so worth the money.
The Sony A6000 is wonderful for the price...APS sensor too and has higher mega pixels.
These three camera's are the best at the moment out there in Micro four/thirds...my humble opinion based on real facts :)

All three of these camera's have so many plus points and are winning over so many DSLR users.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 12:17:50   #
azted Loc: Las Vegas, NV.
 
AntonioReyna wrote:
I am a Canon DSLR guy but I bought a NEX-6, with the super small 16-50z lens and I love it. The image quality and colors are great. It is my walkaround combo but I am not going to invest too much in the system, perhaps the new 18-105/f4 zoom as I still use the Canon for important stuff. I was in the Sony store in Costa Mesa and it was great to see all their bodies and lenses in one place.


I recently got the 18-105 EZ "G" glass lens, and it is by far the best lens in the line-up. Paired with my NEX-7 the images are tack sharp and bright!

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 13:17:45   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
WereWolf1967 wrote:
I do not post process any of my shots. I've always shot "Chromes" and for better or worse, what I see is what I shot. I'm very old school about that.

I'm the same way.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.