Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: chazz4623
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 46 next>>
Oct 24, 2016 10:16:10   #
YES!!!!
Go to
Oct 24, 2016 10:13:33   #
I like all of them, the last is a portrait, the others are 'in the setting', and an excellent way to show context, not wasted space. Lighting, composition, etc., all very good. I hope they kids frame some of your work for display and future memories.
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 12:31:29   #
Do what you gotta do.
Rongnongno wrote:
This is not a political debate thread or how to run a political debate.

If this is what it is going to turn into I will request a transfer to the 'attic'.

This is about 'get folks to vote' not about get to vote for or against.
Go to
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 20, 2016 12:11:22   #
And such is the state of affairs in today's world. Your suggestion was excellent tho, something that we cant achieve in the world of politics. So much could be better if the word compromise were removed from the list of no-no words. lol
windshoppe wrote:
bookman & chazz4623:

You are both, of course, totally correct. My "suggestions" were made mainly to point out the absurdity of the debates as they are currently conducted. Regrettably, the American people can expect no better in the future.
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 12:04:50   #
I was working shifts and going to school during that time... I missed those debates, but remember the anger then, it was about as strong as it is now. People werent as plentiful then, so we werent as crowded, meaning the underlying stress levels werent quite so high as now. That makes a difference, plus, the things that have happened since has changed the way people view and interpret their world.
burkphoto wrote:
Well, I remember Nixon vs McGovern... that was pretty awful. But after watching last night's debate, I don't like either of the two major candidates any more than before. Chris Wallace was the best moderator of the three, though.
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 12:00:57   #
All the candidates I've ever seen would not agree to a debate with those rules. They want to do things just the way they are now doing them, they dont want to be required to answer a question. As bad as the system is, with the current players, it is the best we can hope for.That means it will continue to be almost meaningless. To quote from an old popular song " Nobody's right when everybody's wrong".
windshoppe wrote:
Hmmmnn...Chris Wallace - best of the worst, perhaps. Not much credit there, however.

I have 3 suggestions for future debates, two procedural and one for the moderator.

1. ONE live mike - that of the current designated speaker - and controlled by the moderator.

2. If no response from the audience is desired, have NO audience. Candidates can't resist the urge to "play to the live audience" in any case.

3. Ask the candidate the question. If he/she does not answer the question but turns to another topic, go on to the next candidate.
When returning to the first candidate ask the original question, explaining that it was not addressed.
If still not addressed repeat the process.
Hmmmnn...Chris Wallace - best of the worst, perhap... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 20, 2016 05:51:33   #
Worst choices in my lifetime, but the responsiblity to participate overrides any other consideration. Congrats on the kids' birthday and having them register to vote. Lets hope they continue a proud American tradition.
burkphoto wrote:
Good for you!

I have twins who turn 18 on Sunday. Gotta get 'em down to register with Selective Service (the draft board) next week... They registered to vote last year, and will vote in November, if not sooner.

We're all angry at the choices this time, but we'll vote anyway.
Go to
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Oct 14, 2016 07:30:59   #
My two cents worth. So sorry about her injuries, so glad they werent more severe. She is beautiful and all the elements of this shot came together and make for a superb result. When we make comments about the elements of a shot, we are (hopefully) being gracious and expressing how we would individualize to our own tastes or preferences. All the comments so far I agree with, as for me, a woman can be beautiful whether she has any body hair, or even huge amounts anywhere or everywhere. I have seen some models with thick hair over most oftheir bodies who were stunning, especially if the hair is dark, and the skin is pale, the contrast making for a dramatic look. Its a lot of fun reading about the ideas most posters/pesponders here have, I'm so glad there havent been the distasteful remarks we see sometimes on here, this lady gives us such a nice, enjoyable view of herself and my thanks to both her and the poster. More please, job well done and I hope she was pleased with the results. I know one beautiful lady who was in a bad accident and has considerable hip deformity to live with despite several surgeries to correct as much as possible.
Go to
Oct 8, 2016 16:42:17   #
Perhaps you should remove it from the ones you visit. If you think this is too explicit on a forum that says nude in it's description, just what did you expect, ankle only shots?
JohnFrim wrote:
Umm, I'm no prude, but that is just a bit too explicit for what I expect on this forum.
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 12:48:19   #
We've seen your other work, and this shot is nowhere near as good. The background, posing, and lighting need major improvement. The model, as usual, is spectacular. Give us more of your best, please.
Robeng wrote:
Here's another image of Kylie
Go to
Oct 7, 2016 12:41:05   #
I'd like to suggest you look at your original post, where you specifically ask for 'comments and critiques'. Most folks here are a friendly bunch (with some glaring exceptions) we would like to welcome you, but I too am a bit confused at your response to suggestions from knowledgeable members. I hope you change your outlook, this is a very valuable place to disccuss and get feedback on photography.
ThePhotographer wrote:
I'm hoping that everyone will join me in posting interesting shots of trees. I love sharing my photos but I also love seeing others photos and getting ideas. I really feel like interaction is important. If you like a photo, take a minute and think about why you like the photo. I'm really hoping for some comments and critiques, some input. I love that we're all in one place and can learn from each other. So here we go, I'll post a couple to get us started.
Go to
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Oct 4, 2016 11:00:28   #
I learned a long time ago that language has to be a living thing or it will die (ever wonder why we dont speak Latin?) Some of the changes are confusing or obnoxious (or worse), but I can adapt if I learn the new meaning of the words. Its all about context. The progress of humanity isnt a straaight line thing, while good grammar is important, so is the nature of change. We no longer speak anything that resembles the "King's English" and I say we're better for it. Yes, this forum is about PHOTOGRAPHY, not grammar school.
1Feathercrest wrote:
"alot" is not a real word. "A" and "lot" are two separate words. The confusion for people who mistakenly use this non-word is the word "allot" which does not mean a large quantity, but means to apportion. Please keep "a" and "lot" separate. Correct grammar matters.
Go to
Sep 28, 2016 14:10:23   #
Gee thats pretty, I'd like to go there. Is it in walking distance?? Quite a shot!
Go to
Sep 28, 2016 14:06:01   #
PNagy wrote:
Rear view? I would like to see all other views.


Go to
Sep 25, 2016 20:54:28   #
Much improved over the first image IMHO
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 46 next>>
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.