Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Paul60
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Apr 21, 2019 03:12:07   #
johnmccarthy wrote:
Hi Paul,
The suggestions to use a tripod are sound, for most any photography.
Below is an illustration of the "Sunny 16 Rule," that I have been using for a long time.
"Photographing the Moon
Posted: 15 Mar 2016 11:48 PM PDT
Darn, I missed the last eclipse of a full moon. Oh well, now I have to wait for the next one. To be sure I don’t miss it the next time, I am arming myself with this catalog of lunar eclipses from NASA.
I’ve photographed the moon many times—and one eclipse in 2008. I prepared this article to give you an idea of how to photograph an eclipse, but now it’s not necessary.
I have photographed the moon both on a regular night with a full moon and during an eclipse. Both of them are easy if you know how. In case you want to photograph an eclipse, the following is a list of the things that you’re going to need.
1. 35mm camera film or digital
2. 300mm lens or longer
3. Cloudless night during the event
That’s it! Many people try to photograph the moon using a tripod but they don’t realize that it’s not necessary. Why, you ask? Because of the “sunny 16” rule in photography. Wait! In the middle of the night there is no sun! Well, maybe not illuminating you, but it is illuminating the moon.
The sunny f/16 rule states that you can photograph anything that is illuminated by the sun using a shutter speed one number higher than the film or ISO that you’re using in your camera. For example: if you’re using ISO in your camera, the shutter speed/aperture combination should be 1/125 at f/16. Very simple, right?
If you’re using an older mechanical film camera and the battery is dead and you cannot read the light meter, using the sunny f/16 rule will allow you to photograph anything that is illuminated by the sun.
What about digital cameras? Digital cameras or film cameras are no different in this situation. For shots of the moon, either camera will capture the moon the same way or anything else illuminated by the sun. Don’t forget that you have a light meter to help you obtain the correct exposure and viewing the images on the screen gives you immediate feedback so you can make changes in the event you need to. Okay, enough of that. Let me tell you what you can do to photograph the moon and why a tripod is not necessary.
If you’re using a digital camera, do the following:
1. Set your aperture to f/16.
2. Set the ISO to 100.
3. Set the white balance to daylight.
4. Set the color mode to landscape.
5. Set your shutter speed to 1/125 of a second.
For a film camera, forget steps 3 and 4.
As you can see, everything is very easy to do and chances are that if you follow this information you’ll get great shots of the moon. But, wait I’m not done yet!
Since the moon is so far away, why use the lens almost fully closed? Since the moon is thousands of miles away from us, we should not worry about depth of field. So, why not use the lens fully open and take advantage of using a very fast shutter speed? This is what I do every time that I photograph the moon.
• f/16 at 1/125 of a second, right? So that means that you can use reciprocal exposures:
• f/11 at 1/250
• f/8 at 1/500
• f/5.6 at 1/1000
• f/4 at 1/2000
• f/2.8 at f/4000
What? Photograph the moon using a 1/4000 of a second? YES! All these are reciprocal exposures and what that means is that each of these settings will give you the same amount of light in your sensor. Of course, some people do not have their cameras set correctly. A couple of my students keep accidentally setting their exposure compensation settings to -4.0 stops on their Nikon cameras, and it’s all because the compensation dial and the aperture dial are one and the same in some Nikon cameras. Why Nikon placed these setting together, I don’t know. So if you have a Nikon camera and, like ALL of my students, you use your camera in manual mode, make sure that you’re in the correct setting when changing the aperture of the lens so you don’t accidentally set a (-) minus exposure on the aperture of the lens.
Back to the very fast shutter speed at night. Is it possible to use that in the middle of the night and get the picture? Of course it is. Anything that is illuminated by the sun during the day or at night (the moon) can be photographed using this photography rule. Of course, if you’re going to photograph an eclipse of the moon, the setting will be very different—at least the shutter speed. During an eclipse you will be forced to use slower and slower shutter speeds to compensate for the loss of light. But you’ll get the image!"
About the Author:
Ignacio Alvarez is a photography instructor at City Colleges of Chicago.
Hi Paul, br The suggestions to use a tripod are so... (show quote)


Cripes!

Thanks John, that is a wealth of brilliant advice.

I've printed your post & will keep it handy when I'm out next.

Much appreciate the info.

Cheers

Paul.

PS, I had heard about the 'Sunny 16 Rule' on a YouTube video.

A pro photographer is giving an amateur some friendly photography advice & mentions it. He also mentioned Ugly Hedgehog. That's how I found out about this site.

If he's reading this, thanks !
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 21:30:15   #
Hi Chaps,

Thanks to each & all for your replies, advice & some great photos.

I suppose to most of you, moon photos are boring. But I only bought my P1000 a few weeks ago, & this is my first time (with a lovely clear sky & full moon).

So I'm as excited as a kid in a sweet shop !

Cheers

Paul :)
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 08:23:40   #
DavidPine wrote:
Here's what I do: Tripod and timed shutter release. D500, 200-500 f/5.6 @ f/11. ISO 100 at 1/250 ss.


Thanks David !

Cheers mate.
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 07:29:48   #
billnikon wrote:
NO AUTO SETTINGS. You must go manual, I would try a starting exposure of ISO 100, 125 sec. at f16. The old rule of thumb for a moon exposure is 1/iso at F16. Try that as a starting point. Also, manual focusing might also help, and a tripod at 3000 mm.


Thanks Bill, (and all).

I'll try those suggestions.

I'm just waiting for the cameras battery to fully charge, then I'm out there.

A beautiful clear night, full moon. Perfect conditions.

Cheers

Paul :)
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 02:31:29   #
jerryc41 wrote:
One solution would be to zoom max - on a tripod - and then crop the result.


Hi Jerry,

Can you explain how that works please.

I saw a youtube video where a chap say's he's cropped a zoomed in moon video shot in 4k to 1080p, but I have no idea what that means or how to do that.

Cheers

Paul :)
Go to
Apr 20, 2019 02:15:13   #
Here are a couple of my moon photos as requested.

Not very good, but I am just a beginner at photography.

I'm surprised this was as far as the P1000 would zoom in. I have seen other P900 & P1000 users getting way closer zoom.

Not sure why that is.

Cheers

Paul. :)




Go to
Apr 19, 2019 22:10:18   #
Thanks chaps,

I shall take those suggestions on board.

And I'll look out for that book too.

Cheers

Paul.

PS, another full moon & clear skies tonight ! :)
Go to
Apr 19, 2019 09:50:58   #
littlebug wrote:
Paul could you post some photos there's some fine photography's on this site and I'd like to see your photos I my self am trying to photograph the moon and the guys just might have the answer for both of us
Thanks David DeMambro
Littlebug


Hello David,

As soon as I can get them off the card, onto my laptop, I shall share them.

They look pretty good but I think the zoom could be better compared to other P1000 users moon photos & videos I have seen.

I was amazed at how quickly the moon moves across the flip out screen/view finder at that level of zoom. In my ignorance, I thought it would be like filming a building or tree etc. Duh !

Talk about a moving target !

I have a Benro geared head on the way, so that should help.

Although I'm thinking a video pan head would be better ?

Cheers

Paul. :)
Go to
Apr 19, 2019 09:31:35   #
Evening all,

I just bought the ML-17 remote for my P1000

Prior to it, I had SnapBridge up & running on my iPhone. Worked great.

Now I have had to reset everything to get the Bluetooth remote to bind. It also works great.

But now I have no WiFi SnapBridge connection. It seems like as you set one up, & it buggers up the other.

Can't we have both running if required ?

I have a video & pics I want to get from the camera and it would be a pain to remove the SD card everytime.

Cheers,
Paul :)
Go to
Apr 19, 2019 09:23:28   #
Thanks for the quick replies,

Yes, it's on a steady tripod.

I am a complete beginner, so I'm not sure what I'm doing.

I have ordered a book (it's in the post) that will hopefully help.

Now I'm also trying to get the photos & video on to my iphone.

I bought the Bluetooth remote for the P1000, but it seems to have mucked up my wifi settings.

A topic for a new post.

Cheers

Paul :)
Go to
Apr 19, 2019 08:41:26   #
Hi Chaps,

I just went outside with my P1000 to take pics & video of the moon.

It is a beautiful full moon. Crystal clear night sky.

I had the P1000 on full zoom, 3000mm, but it doesn't get anywhere near the detail, or magnification that I see other people getting.

Am I doing something wrong ?

I was just set on the 'Green' Auto setting. Lens hood on, and my backyard lights were on so I could see what I was doing, although they don't light up the yard like a Christmas tree.

Any tips appreciated.

Paul :)
Go to
Apr 18, 2019 06:18:55   #
Pedro2156 wrote:
Both myself and my Wife have the Mach3, I found the model numbers and variations quite confusing, but my wife has the carbon fiber TMA28C, I ha e the TMA38CL.
Without doubt one of the best value for money tripods around. Looked at the 3legged thing (Sorry, but very poor compared to the Mach3). I would personally highly recommend this tripod.


Thanks Pedro,

I have found both a TMA28AL & the TMA37AL. I can't find a 38AL though the 37 looks like it's similar.

A great price too.

I've ordered it.

Cheers

Paul :)
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 22:48:57   #
GrandmaG wrote:
For printing photos at home, I use the Canon Pro 10. I’ve always used Canon printers for photos and have been very impressed with the Pixma models. My last printer was the Canon Pro 100. Great printer; but I got a deal on the Pro-10 for $100, so I sold the Pro-100.

However, I’m glad that I saw your post. I have been looking for a good small printer to take to scrapbooking events; and this one seems perfect.


You will love this printer. You can use it plugged in to the mains as well as the battery of course.

It prints fantastic.
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 10:08:57   #
Blair Shaw Jr wrote:
Recently bought one and it's a Beast....35 ld rated. I love it and it quite tall with a wide base and comes with all the tools & a second (shorter) center replacement riser and metal points for the feet if needed.
The legs are 3 sections and not 5 like the toothpicks usually are. 1 1/2" diameter also (BEEFY)
I use it with my Gimabl and Large lenses.....go for it .

It was not expensive as well which really sold me cause I'm poor after all the cameras & lenses I bought.

Hope this was helpful.


Jimbo
Recently bought one and it's a Beast....35 ld rate... (show quote)


Thanks Jimbo,

Which model should I get ? There are a few that I can see. Not sure which is the sturdiest though ?
Go to
Apr 17, 2019 09:59:21   #
Hi all,

Does anyone know anything about the Benro Mach 3 tripod range ?

I need something that will hold up a Nikon P1000 without shaking.

I just purchased the Benro geard head and I need a sturdy tripod that won't break the bank.

From what I can see, they have different models in this Mach 3 range. I'd hate to get another toothpick like the Befree tripod I bought.

The particular model I'm looking at is the Mach 3 TMA28A. I don't need the carbon version as I'm only using it out of my car or in my backyard.

I don't plan on any major cross country hikes that need serious weight reduction. Although lightweight would be good, but I realise I need stability above all.

Thanks

Paul :)
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.