Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jdedmonds
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 next>>
Nov 8, 2019 22:27:18   #
Dewman wrote:
I always try to cut to the chase. Why mince words?


Surely someone as sagacious as you would avoid cliches like "cut to the chase." It would have been very easy for you in responding to my initial post here to say you disagreed, and that would have been the point from which to launch your reasons for disagreeing. To have leaped in with name calling is only symptomatic of our present culture, where it's more important to be nasty than diplomatic. Knock yourself out.
Go to
Nov 8, 2019 18:44:44   #
Dewman wrote:
I pity those with the lack of an imagination. They miss out on so much of life. Sorry for your misfortune.


Well, how's that for snide?
Go to
Nov 8, 2019 15:02:01   #
Dewman wrote:
A cold winter night and some photo props.


It's difficult for me to wrap my mind around a metaphor that seems to equate the delicacy and beauty of red roses and a machine built for killing people.
Go to
Nov 4, 2019 16:10:39   #
philmurfin wrote:
A Mafia Godfather finds out that his bookkeeper, Guido, has cheated  him out of $10,000,000.00.His bookkeeper is deaf.  That was the reason he got the job in the first place. It was assumed that Guido would hear nothing and would therefore never have to testify in court.

When the Godfather goes to confront Guido about the missing $10 million, he takes along his lawyer, who knows sign language.

The Godfather tells the lawyer, "Ask him where the money is."

 The lawyer, using sign language, asks Guido, “Where's the money?”

Guido signs back, "I don't know what you are talking about."
 
The lawyer tells the Godfather, "He says he doesn't know what you are  talking about."

The Godfather pulls out a pistol, puts it to Guido's head and says, "Ask him again or I'll kill him!"


The lawyer signs to Guido, "He'll kill you if you don't tell him."


Guido trembles and signs back, "OK! You win! The money is in a brown briefcase, buried behind the shed at my cousin Bruno's house."


The Godfather asks the lawyer, "What did he say?"

The lawyer replies, "He says you don't have the balls to pull the trigger."

  
Don't you just love lawyers?
A Mafia Godfather finds out that his bookkeeper, G... (show quote)


Rattler bites one of two cowboys right on the end of it while he's taking a leak. He pleads with other guy to go find a doctor to find out what to do. Doctor tells guy to cut two little "xs" near the bite marks then suck out the venom. Guy goes back to his stricken partner, who desperately asks him what the doctor said. Guy says, "the doctor says you're gonna die."
Go to
Oct 30, 2019 15:23:50   #
trapper1 wrote:
I have seen reference to the number of clicks a camera has made. I assume that this means the number of pictures that the camera has made. If this assumption is correct, out of curiosity, how many clicks can a camera, say a Nikon DSLR 5600 for example, make before it starts requiring repairs or starts to malfunction?


I think you're referring to the number of times the shutter has been actuated. I don't know how many actuations a D5600 shutter is rated at; the higher end Nikon DSLRs are rated 150K to 200K. I think.
Go to
Oct 28, 2019 20:08:39   #
Hal81 wrote:
Its that time of the year.


It's = it is.
Go to
Oct 25, 2019 17:43:41   #
betsysmorris wrote:
I started with a canon bridge camera a number of years ago, and ultimately bought a Sony A6000 when I went to interchangeable lenses. I did some reading online, did a couple of Lynda.com photography courses, and of course practiced. I’ve had some good photos, but also many that left something to be desired. I recently retired, and decided to get serious about this photography thing. I stumbled across a course out of Great Britain called A Year With My Camera (AYWMC) by Emma Davies. It’s free, all online, though you can purchase an app and/or a book, if you want. There is a new lesson each week. I am 5 weeks into the program, and I have already learned so much. I wanted to share this with you because I think even more experienced photographers could learn something. It is answering many of the questions I’ve had. If you want to learn more, please give it a go.
I started with a canon bridge camera a number of y... (show quote)


". . . many that left something to be desired." Before digital, I always felt good if a 36 exposure roll had as many as two good images, and with digital I'm in about the same ball park. I wonder if there might be a consensus among pros as to their percentage of shots they keep.
Go to
Oct 13, 2019 19:58:21   #
elf wrote:
I took some photos on Saturday and one of the ladies face looks too fat. I know her and she doesn't really look that way.
I have a Canon T5, used an EF 28-80 at 28mm. ISO 400 5.6 100th sec. Do you folks think that it was the 28mm setting that made her look so fat or what else could it be?
tks Ed


Don't know what caused it, but my experience has taught me that when post processing images of people (portraits as well as just snap shots), when I'm done with everything else, ctrl + alt + I; change the width unit to percent, then enter somewhere around 96%. Hit OK and voila, the people look skinnier. Don't tell the subjects.
Go to
Oct 13, 2019 19:50:36   #
joer wrote:
Mostly what one hears from photographers, i.e., pro, enthusiast and neophytes, is that the equipment doesn't matter; its the photographer.

Then one has to ask, how many cameras, lenses, flashes, accessories, etc., do you have? Or what cameras or equipment do you lust after?

I think the evidence suggests that gear does matter, although it may not be most important. A skilled lumberjack with an axe will not compete with a man/woman who knows how to use a chain saw.


I've heard 50% the photographer, 40% the glass, 5% the camera and 5% luck.
Go to
Oct 13, 2019 19:48:28   #
Tom DePuy wrote:
These were taken this weekend at Rock Hill SC BMX track...


The plural of rider is riders. No apostrophe.
Go to
Oct 5, 2019 15:50:53   #
Martys wrote:
Am looking for a Nikon D810 guide book,....not the included purchase manual from Nikon.

PM me

Thanks muchly

Marty


Thom Hogan's Guide to the Nikon D810. Nearly a thousand pages of microscopically detailed explanation.
Go to
Oct 4, 2019 18:34:30   #
Gene51 wrote:
Actually, the reason you buy a macro lens is so that you have a magnification of at least 1:1 at the minimum focusing distance AND if you decide to use extension tubes, the lens is already optimized for best quality at the minimum focus distance and closer.

The working distance on my Tamron 180mm is 18.5" and the Sigma is 15" - at their MFDs, the image magnification is 1:1.

There is no school of thought that if you use a lens at it's minimum focus distance AND your subject is fairly large, like a Hibiscus flower, there will be some cropping unless you move back. That's not an opinion.

At 1:1, it doesn't matter if you are at 6" from the subject with a 60mm lens or 18.5" from the subject with a 200mm lens - the amount of crop will be exactly the same because the magnification and the field of view will be exactly the same. But at 6" with a shorter lens you will encounter some challenges for lighting and lens /camera/human shadow.

The primary (but not the only) reason to get a longer macro lens is to have that 18" or more working distance and still have 1:1 magnification.

This is not a school of thought, it comes from applied practice.
Actually, the reason you buy a macro lens is so th... (show quote)


I'm not clear about your post. I have never had a thought process in which I"... have a magnification of at least 1:1 at the minimum focusing distance AND . . . decide to use extension tubes, the lens is already optimized for best quality at the minimum focus distance and closer. " I'm not nearly so knowledgeable to think that way and in sixty plus years of photography I've never even thought about extension tubes. I think that the quoted material, rather than embodying a school of thought, merely describes what's happening. Maybe, instead of using "school of thought," I should have said that the problems I then described were things to consider when choosing and using a macro lens. Reading my original post once again I also note that I failed to say that the Sigma lens I bought is a macro.
Go to
Oct 4, 2019 15:37:46   #
RahulKhosla wrote:
Suggestions for a high quality macro lens to fit Nikon D850?


The reason you buy a macro lens is that it can focus when the lens is very close to the subject. There is a school of thought that if the macro lens is very very close to the subject problems may arise. E.g., the central axis of the lens is too far away from the center of the subject to capture the entire subject. Also you may get so close that the lens's shadow falls on the subject. Those who subscribe to this school maintain that in order to avoid all these problems you should be using a macro lens of 200mm focal length or longer, which results in the lens being farther away from the subject when focus is achieved. I bought a 24mm Sigma f1.8 many years ago and frequently experience the problems described above. I haven't yet followed the wisdom and bought a 200mm or longer macro lens because I blew my hobby budget on the Nikon AF-S 80-400 VR, which cost me closer to 3K than to 2K. Once I build up enough money, my next lens is going to be a Nikon macro.
Go to
Oct 3, 2019 17:23:10   #
The key
Go to
Sep 28, 2019 18:44:13   #
cameranut wrote:
Due to the excessive heat and my bum knee, I have not been outside getting any photos lately. It has been so hot that all of the critters are waiting till dark to come out, so I decided to catch them with a trail cam. The image quality lacks a lot to be desired but the subject matter is kind of interesting. I think the fox was marking his territory before leaving. Going to try to load a 20 second video.


Why don't you post the picture?
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.