Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: brookie
Page: 1 2 next>>
Jun 30, 2017 14:55:49   #
Mac wrote:
I'm sure that will help him in deciding which 50mm lens to buy.


Why be snide? [rhetorical question]

Upon recently discovering UHH, I was comfortable with the apparent camaraderie, enjoyed many of the pictures, and learned a few things.

Now, I sense unpleasantness creeping in, and I have enough of my own grouchiness not to want any additional.

So, I'm out of here.
Go to
Jun 24, 2017 10:05:04   #
Wow! I guess that I've been out of the buyer loop a long time. When I purchased my 24-120 for my Nikon D700, it was not--as far as I know--a
"kit lens." Doesn't matter, I love the lens, have been using it for quite a while, and hope you enjoy the 24-120 as much as I do.

PeterDragon wrote:
Go to
Jun 24, 2017 09:47:41   #
Sylvias wrote:
Some of the flowers blooming in our garden from a soft focus rose, African daisy head I found lying on the patio, UFO's landed on the pink Poppies, a Fuchsia hiding in the undergrowth and more.

Lovely! You are doing what I aspire to.
Thank you for sharing.

Canon 650D, 18-55 lens.

Please try the downloads.
Go to
Jun 24, 2017 09:42:03   #
My very subjective "contribution":
On my new Fuji X-E2s, I'm using just one lens--Fujij's "kit" 18-55. On my old friend, Nikon D700, I have Nikon 24-120, another old friend. Occasionally, usually for flowers in our garden, the Nikon D60 macro.
Why? Long story short -- as my life changes, so do my needs.

dennis2146 wrote:
While I can't totally disagree with you I have one small thing to bring up. To me and I suspect many of us, a walk around lens is one we walk around with because it is somewhat lightweight and also handles the majority of our photography chores as well. I look at the 28-300 lens you mentioned and think that, yes, it can be a walk around lens for you if you use it for a great proportion of your photographs. But for most of us we want lighter and handier size wize for a walk around lens since we hardly use the 300mm part of the lens. Again, I am not disagreeing and if that is the lens you mostly use the we have no disagreement at all. But I am curious. How much do you use the 200-300mm side of your lens out of all your photography with it?

Dennis
While I can't totally disagree with you I have one... (show quote)
Go to
May 25, 2017 09:13:08   #
I've been using MACs for 30+ years, but if I were to change, I'd probably look at Lenovo, which took over from IBM a while ago.
Good luck!
Go to
May 12, 2017 08:48:14   #
magpix wrote:
Consider the 55-200mm. It's sharper than the 18-135 and will give you an effective reach of 300mm. If you later add the 10-24mm, you'll have the ideal travel kit. If you feel you absolutely need a weather sealed lens, or if you want just one walk-around lens you can go with the 18-135. But you'll get sharper images with the 18-55 and 55-200 combo.


Thank you, magpix, and everyone else who has replied. Replacing the "kit" lens, which I like, or adding the 55-200 are great and appealing suggestions. Since reading these recommendations, I've been researching both options. And now (for now) I'm going to shoot and wait. Get to know my new camera a bit better.
As I remember (don't have my notes in front of me), each of these lenses is approximately twice the weight of the 18-55, and I'm not sure that I'm ready for that.
Thanks, again,
brookie
Go to
May 11, 2017 10:09:36   #
Quick back story
I've been divesting myself of Nikon gear, which I assembled over an extended period of time. Keeping just one camera, D700 and two lenses, 60mm macro 2.8 and 28-105 3.5-4.5. Reason? Can't handle the weight anymore and I don't need what I did when working.


So, the above Nikon camera and lenses are old friends that I will take out from time-to-time.

And the Fuji X-E2s, with the very good 18-55 "kit" lens, is becoming my new friend. Eventually, I'd like just one more lens for the Fuji. Sharp, zoom that might extend my range to 200mm, not too heavy.

I'd appreciate any suggestions you might have.

As always, thank you.
Go to
May 6, 2017 08:29:40   #
FiddleMaker wrote:
Is the IQ of the Nikon 24-70 VRII all that much better than the Nikon 24-120 VR/N lens ??
The 24-70 VRII is very expensive and very heavy and I am undecided as whether I should get the 24-70 VRII or the less expensive and much lighter 24-120 VR.
I think the 24-70 VRII would be too heavy as a walk-around lens for my D750. But if the image quality is that much better, I might consider it.
Thanks for any opinions. ~FiddleMaker


From personal experience / preference only: When I was shooting exclusively with Nikons, out of a fairly large collection of lenses for the D700, the 24-120 f/4 was my favorite, most used lens. Versatile and reliable and relatively light. Have fun and good luck!
Go to
Apr 26, 2017 13:36:22   #
MaggieB wrote:
I will be retiring in the next year and plan to spend time indulging myself in photography of my grandchildren, travel and nature. I need a good zoom so that I can take great photos of my granddaughters in their athletics and my grandson in his band performances. I also love to photograph mushrooms, flowers, ferns, etc and want to know that when I shoot it that it is in focus and I don't miss an opportunity.

Any advice is greatly appreciated. Oh and I want it to be a video and still camera all in one.

Thanks in advance!

MaggieB
I will be retiring in the next year and plan to sp... (show quote)


Just a small note of caution, Maggie, based on recent personal experience.

You might want to go slow on making purchases. As I began planning retirement and photography, I put together a wonderful kit that proved not to serve my needs in retirement. What I needed when employed became redundant and overwhelming. Back on track now. No one's fault, it just happened that way.

On the other hand, it's never too soon to research and to enjoy the process. I think by starting at UHH, you have a great start. And, personally, my 'go-to' research stand-byes are consistently dp.review. com and B&H.

Best wishes and Enjoy
brookie
Go to
Apr 24, 2017 15:33:21   #
craggycrossers wrote:
Hi Brookie, from the UK, where, although we're 3 weeks into April, the weather looks like it's going to have a "wee bite back" this coming week.

You asked for suggestions for "weight, ease of use, and something I can grab at a moment's notice", so here's my offering ...... I'm sure you can research these cameras easily, so I'm not going to tell you where to look.

If you want some zoom - 1) Panasonic LX100 - 2) Fuji X-E2s with the superb XF 18-55 f2.8-4 lens.

If you're happy to zoom with your feet - the Fuji X100T.

There ya' go ! Take a good look !
Hi Brookie, from the UK, where, although we're 3 w... (show quote)


Thanks so much, craggycrossers! The many serious, helpful, and meaningful replies have been gratifyingly beyond expectations. I'm replying to you directly because after reading all responses, researching, and re-evaluating, I've settled on the Fuji X-E2s with accompanying lens. After many years shooting Nikon exclusively, neither Fuji nor mirrorless cameras in general had crossed my mind.

Thank you all for your help.
Go to
Apr 21, 2017 09:17:55   #
Highly subjective, so I'll try to explain.

With two D700s and a few Nikon lenses, I have as much as I need in terms of quality and functionality; but sometimes it's too much--weight, ease of use, a camera I can grab at a moment's notice are increasingly important.

Picture quality, of course, is important.

I'll keep one or both D700s.

Can you recommend the best point and shoot that you know for under $1,000?

Thanks!
Go to
Apr 18, 2017 14:05:32   #
I have the two D700s that served me well when I was still working. Now, one camera has the 24-120 lens and the other 60mm macro--both Nikon.

Having sold almost everything else, I'm continuing to debate selling the D700s and buying "down" to something lighter and compact and less expensive. Given that I retired three years ago, and still have not let the two cameras / two lenses loose, and influenced by what I've read here today, I'm probably going to keep what I have.

I should add that I also have the attachable battery pack that allows me to increase or decrease the camera weight. AND I loved the camera a long time ago and continue to love it. AND it does everything I ask of it.

Thoughts?

Thanks for listening!
Go to
Jan 23, 2017 08:04:04   #
Kevin, I'm not a professional or even an expert amateur photographer; but I do appreciate fine photography for mood and technique. Lovely work. I hope you post more portraits of any subject you choose.
Thanks for sharing!
Go to
Jan 8, 2017 12:21:34   #
I'm amazed at how many people have brick and mortar stores that match B&H prices. Either your local stores have changed or maintained pricing that matches my on line experience, or I simply live in the wrong place. Best wishes to all of us.
Go to
Jan 8, 2017 11:49:21   #
For me, there is a clear distinction between purchasing photo equipment on line and other merchandise, such as books, clothing, etc., on line.

For this discussion, I'll stick to photo equipment.

For minor pieces, when a brick and mortar store is convenient, I go there; but not for major equipment. So, all of my cameras and lenses over the last 10 years or so have come mostly from B&H, Adorama, KEH, and Amazon. Why? Price. Reliability. Service. Honesty. I could go on, but you get the idea.

Ethically, I evolved into this position: I never take up a salesperson's time and never handle equipment, unless I'm in the store to purchase that equipment and then only because I need it at that very moment. (A rare occurrence.)

Prior to reaching this ethical bargain with myself, I had spoken with salespeople, handled equipment, and told them what I was willing to pay. Occasionally, this worked out, but more often the salesperson displayed annoyance or hostility and could not meet my bottom line.

I miss talking photography and equipment face-to-face. On the other hand--using B&H as an example--I "meet" helpful, knowledgeable people who are generous with their time and don't push to make a sale. In addition, they take returns without a hassle.

In preparation for purchasing equipment, I read about product and communicate with fellow photographers on line. This usually leads me to make buying decisions that are right for me. And when I misstep, as already noted, B&H and others accept returns.

One final point: I've used Nikon bodies and lenses (DSLR) exclusively for 15+ years, so purchasing new equipment is probably less demanding a task than it is for someone who works in multiple systems.

Thanks for listening.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.