Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: kbatschke
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 next>>
Feb 16, 2019 09:05:16   #
gunflint wrote:
My wife and I are just south of Cancun right now for 2 weeks, have our own car, drove to Chichen Itza and another small ruin, visited cenotes, spent the night there and drove back to our resort the next day. I have the Nikon D850, several lenses, and a tripod. You just have to use common sense like don't walk around Cancun late at night. Keep your gear locked in a suit case or room safe when you don't need it. I would take the same precautions anywhere in the world. If you are staying a a big resort, no real concerns.
My wife and I are just south of Cancun right now f... (show quote)


Excellent response. I go to a resort south of Cancun twice a year for the past ten years. Follow the advice above. Couldn’t get this shot without decent gear.


(Download)
Go to
Dec 30, 2018 09:46:17   #
bgrn wrote:
Absolutely buy them from a major store. Merrill and Keen are very good as are some others. Hiking boots have different types of soles depending on what you mostly do. Like most clothing different brands of the same size will fit different so it’s important to try them on first, don’t just try the right or left, put them both on and walk around the store. I buy mine from REI because they have a very knowledgeable staff. And you can’t beat the return policy. Just a note, my wife used to wear Merrill’s but now she preferes rebok.
Absolutely buy them from a major store. Merrill ... (show quote)

I’ll second on Keen. Have lots of miles on mine and very happy. Light weight and waterproof.
Go to
Oct 2, 2018 08:04:48   #
joer wrote:
Not in any particular order.

Electronic viewfinder - gobs of info if I want, and seeing the image before you take it
Silent shutter - totally silent and works in every mode but flash
Reasonably quiet mechanical shutter
Electronic Shutter - less wear and tear
Sans mirror box - no vibration or noise
5 stop in camera stabilization - works with any lens and in conjunction with OSS on Sony lenses
Eye focus tracking
Smaller size and weight - if you choose lenses prudently
Customization - so much more
Less high ISO noise.
Chance to set up complete kit from scratch not piece meal.

The down side:

Not economical to replace lenses and accessories
Needed to learn new camera and menu

Gave up two very excellent cameras and some very good lenses.

Would I do it again?...most definitely.
Not in any particular order. br br Electronic vie... (show quote)


I would add no need for micro fine lens adjustments. I was constantly frustrated with my dslr and back/front focus issues. Agree with all your other comments.
Go to
Sep 29, 2018 09:12:25   #
imagemeister wrote:
Sony A6500 with Sigma MC11 adapter - must be Canon or the latest Sigma lenses.

..

Agree. I went 70d to a6500. Love the camera. However. The EF-S lenses don’t work with the MC-11. Only EF lenses.
Go to
Sep 11, 2018 13:18:57   #
bcrawf wrote:
What is the latest on whether a monopod is allowed in carry-on luggage on international flights? Thanks for help. We leave today.


I researched this last month prior to a trip to Italy. Domestically, TSA seems to be fine with monopods and travel tri-pods in carry-on luggage (I've done this many times). Not necessarily so in EU however. There were mixed reports on multiple websites. As an aside, my small travel umbrella gets my bag searched every time through security in Amsterdam airport so I now take it out and place in the security bin prior to screening. Based on this regular experience with a tiny umbrella, I chose to check my bag with monopod rather than have the hassle of returning to check the bag. YMMV.
Go to
Jul 21, 2018 13:24:05   #
Going to be spending five days in the Florence area. Never traveled there and would like suggestions for areas to get good landscape and architectural photos.

Thanks,

Karl
Go to
Jul 4, 2018 16:44:04   #
BobinSDakota wrote:
Thanks Karl,
Your original post states you purchased the lens in 2016.

Bob


Sorry, I thought it was winter of 2016 and double checked. It was December of 2015.
Go to
Jul 2, 2018 09:59:33   #
BobinSDakota wrote:
Hi Karl,
Are you the original owner of this lens?
Thank you

Bob


Yes I am. Purchase from Amazon from an authorized dealer (not grey-market) December 2017.
Go to
Jun 17, 2018 08:23:29   #
Well, no one needs to say 'I told you so'. I certainly know better as well but wanted to share this experience as a reminder.

My wife and I stayed in a hotel near the Chicago Botanic Garden and got up fairly early and were at the garden by 8am. My plan was to get some great landscape shots, particularly of the Japanese Garden vistas. It was already in the low 80's and humidity was quite high. Saw some fogging on my lens filter and waited for 15 minutes or so expecting that all would be well.
Spent about an hour shooting what appeared to be some great shots. After downloading to LR, I see a relatively small (maybe 5%) ghosting area in the very center of all the images except those taken in the final 15 minutes or so. Definitely mad at myself for not doing more to acclimate the glass, was shooting with a Canon 24-70 f2.8, so a lot of mass there to warm up.
I didn't keep the camera in the car overnight for theft concern reasons but I could have taken it out prior to breakfast and had an additional 30-40 minutes for acclimation. Fortunately, I live in Chicago-land and can recreate the shots. This opportunity is not always the case for travel photography.
I haven't tried a local adjustment brush (in LR) yet to see if I can dehaze the small spot. Due to the subject matter, using the healing tool may not help. Anyway, lesson learned and reminder shared.
Go to
Jun 10, 2018 06:08:00   #
rwilson1942 wrote:
I regularly shoot at ISO 1600 with my A6500 and after applying a little noise reduction I find it quite acceptable.


I've found the same to be true. Acceptability (subjective as mentioned) decreases with ISO beyond 1600 but I would not hesitate to go up as high as 6400 to get the shot if necessary. That's where I've set my auto-ISO limit.
Go to
May 30, 2018 10:49:37   #
I'm selling my gently used Canon gear and moving to a mirrorless system. Purchased this lens in winter of 2016. Used once and found I didn't have the patience for macro photography. No signs of wear. Have original box and packing. Includes original lens hood, front and back caps. I take PayPal or cash for local sales in Chicagoland. $550 you pay shipping. US sales only please.

Thanks for looking!

Karl


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
May 25, 2018 17:20:26   #
jaycoffman wrote:
Funny, I've been to all parts of Mexico about 50 times and never had anything stolen.




I've been traveling (as an American business man) as many times or more than you've mentioned and had the same experience. Petty theft happens everywhere and one certainly must be careful with valuables. You are no more likely to have something stolen in Mexico than in the US.
Go to
May 25, 2018 13:13:51   #
baer wrote:
Going to Mexico City for my daughter’s wedding in January and want to bring a camera. I have a Nikon D300 and Sony RX100IV. Not satisfied with either (too bulky or slow, respectively). I have mostly Nikon (FTn, D4) and a Fuji 120 film rangefinder plus 4x5 graflex.

Is it time to upgrade to NikonD850 or Fuji (or Sony) mirrorless? Any tips re camera safety in Mexico?
Thanks,
Baer


I've made two Cancun (and several EU) trips with my Sony a6500 and the 16-50mm and 50-210mm kit lenses. With the 16-50mm installed, I can put the camera in a jacket pocket. Not much bigger than a point and shoot. I own a a7riii but much prefer to travel light and the a6500 is the ticket for me. There are many mirrorless choices out there. Pick the one that meets your needs and enjoy. You won't go wrong with Fuji, Olympus or Sony from what I've seen.

Regarding safety, be aware of your surroundings. Don't get in a VW Bug taxi. Never travel alone. Understand the neighborhoods you are in and never go to known problem areas. Other than the taxi advice, pretty much what I live by in any large city. Enjoy. I haven't spent a lot of time in Mexico DF but love the country and people.
Go to
May 23, 2018 09:09:42   #
Thanks for the post and endorsement. I've migrated to Sony but still use my Canon 100-400mm L lens with Sigma MC-11 converter. Works well enough for now. Heading down the path of selling my Canon L glass for native Sony. Appreciate the thoughts on this lens.
Go to
May 22, 2018 16:06:01   #
repleo wrote:
I think that (at least in theory) you should be able to still get the ISO and DR benefits of the FF even in crop mode. However for wildlife, where you are likely to be cropping the shot you would be better off with the crop camera and the higher mp capture.

I recently posted an impromptu test with my APS-C Sony 18-105 on both my A6000 and my A7Rii in crop mode and found the image from the A7Rii was slightly better. However, I also compared the results to my FE 90mm macro and found the image from the 90mm was only slightly better too. The 18-105 is a great lens but is not noted for being particularly sharp, whereas the 90 mm macro is considered to be a very sharp lens.

See for yourself here. http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-524479-1.html
I think that (at least in theory) you should be ab... (show quote)


Thanks Repleo. I think I see a very slight improvement when I look at the very fine print on the label below the cork on the a7rii in crop vs. the a6000. However, the same fine print is very clear on the non-cropped 90mm shot. Maybe it's the lens quality? Appreciate the comments and sharing the post.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.