Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: Steinmetz
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15 next>>
Dec 7, 2015 12:43:24   #
Agree 100% although I have my own boxed versions of my software and have not went onto the "cloud" ;-)
Go to
Dec 7, 2015 12:39:27   #
A.J.

Wishing you the best in Your Decisions regarding post processing of pictures taken with a camera ( whether raw, tif, jpeg etc. ).

Suggestions :
First -- learn your camera -- time well spent.
Second -- know for what your are going to use your pictures.
Third -- learn which lenses you need.
Fourth -- get the picture right in the camera ( take your time )

Fifth -- Adobe photoshop products are many -- it is the industry standard -- do not be penny wise and pound foolish in the the long run, listening to those that do not know or have not taken time to learn photoshop, albeit not the only photo editing tool. Adobe lightroom is worth your looking. Note that there are many plug-ins to these adobe programs. A good mentor can show you the advantages of each of the various programs.

Sixth -- beware of compatibility issues of hardware, software, and file types. ( your operating system, your browser, your computer system processor and memory etc .... )

Change is for certain and one has to decide how to face change... whether it be camera, computer, operating systems, browsers, memory types,.... ) I migrated from PC to mac when I started 2 photography businesses in 2006 at the advice of a person that had edited for Walt Disney of Hollywood -- I no longer write and compile my own editing programs -- I have tried many different post processing programs ( applications )... I remained with Adobe CS5extended and lightroom and PhotoMechanics, a standalone app by camera bits in Portland, Oregon ( probably one of the fastest rendering programs on the market ). Shooting raw give you all information camera could gather at time of shooting depending on settings etc... shooting in jpeg high resolution may be just fine for one ...depending on what they are going to do with the picture....

There is no end to learning, regardless of what kind of photography you are going to be doing... Best wishes and HAVE fun as you enjoy your journey...

Best wishes, Ed
Go to
Jul 22, 2014 14:08:53   #
You must put a lot of value on that camera ( D800 ) which you have had for 1.5 years. One can now get a D800 for under 2000 usd ( just saw ad for 2049 usd) when I logged into UH. As with most digital and old film cameras their value goes down. Even with low shutter actuations ( 7000 you mentioned ). Shutter actuation is not the only thing to consider -- the sensor's age is very important too. Best wishes in selling your camera. CHANGE is one word you can be sure of in this world today -- always has been a certain thing, CHANGE. I am a nikon shooter, and even the D4s will have a very limited shelf life for resale. Some of nikon's greatest cameras they have discontinued -- I tested the world of digital with nikon's D50, and purchased all cameras since.... D50 no longer available, D300 no longer available, D3 no longer available.... etc... de ja vue . Remember you have to let go of something to move on.. into the "Future". ;=)
Go to
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Jan 11, 2013 14:14:08   #
John Lash wrote:
I am new to digital photography and need some advice.

I thought I understood that to get good images you needed to get a long lens and get close to your subject filling the frame as much as possible. So I got a 300mm lens and practiced taking pictures of birds at a feeder that were 15-20 feet away. The birds were pretty small... If I enlarge them on the camera screen they are of course bigger, but as I understand it that's not good because you are losing detail.

I see beautiful photos of BIF and hawks and eagles sitting in the tops of trees. 300 mm is fairly long, I know they make teleconverters and 500mm lens which I'm sure would help. So if cropping is bad how do you get the big images?

I read recently about pixel duplication (I think) and looked it up on Youtube. They enlarged some image as an example but just a little. It's done in photoshop, which I don't have. Do you guys use this or other ways? Or are the birds just taken with a long lens from up close
I am new to digital photography and need some advi... (show quote)


At only 15-20 feet away with a 300mm lens, using a tripod, you should be able to get a great picture of even small birds... FILL your frame before you snap the picture; and, there is software that can downsize as well as up size pictures within limits. You may have to physically get closer or get a longer reaching lens depending on distance of your subject from camera.

Using a 800mm lens, like nikons, will work also -- but still fill the frame before snapping the picture and use A tripod, especially if at a feeder... Picture of a 800 mm nikon lens.. attached to nikon camera... lot of weight... in money.


Go to
Jan 11, 2013 14:02:19   #
ziastars wrote:
I want a good photo editing software program that is user friendly.
I have downloaded Gimp and find it very complicated, I am a novice and have no idea where to go to get help regarding "how to" sites etc. Before I get a PS or Light room, I want to have an idea of how to do things. Is this unreasonable? I want a program that will turn my photos into paintings, allow me to manipulate the paint applied and do many other things I see on digital sites. I guess I want input on which program would be the most appropriate for a true beginner. I am using a free version of Pixarra and figuring some things out, but find the program freezes up and it get frustrating. Also, do you recommend a course in Photoshop first?
I want a good photo editing software program that ... (show quote)


I agree with advice from PhotographerJim...

I happen to use Adobe photoshop CS5extended & CS6suite suite. and LightRoom3 & 4
Go to
Jan 11, 2013 13:56:53   #
leatherhelmets wrote:
Hi everyone. Happy New Year. I bought my 13 Y.O. son the Canon T3 with a 18-55MM and 55-250MM for Christmas. I took him out last Sunday adn we learned about Apature (F-Stops and Depth of Field). I plan to take him out again and show him the impact shutter speeds can have on moving objects. Along the way we talk about Photo Composition, Lighting, The Rule of Thirds, etc.

Does anyone have any sage advice on other useful tricks or topics that could help make Photography more enjoyable for a young person starting out?

All suggestions welcome.

Thanks.
Hi everyone. Happy New Year. I bought my 13 Y.O. s... (show quote)


Hello to a new budding photographer,
At first, make it fun.... using a camera 12 mp... wowie...

If this was your first car, Learn the basics, then start out in 1st gear, then 2nd gear, then 3rd gear, then 4th gear... and onward as you have each gear under control. Just trying to shotgun approach driving a car can has discouraging affects;albeit, the same with a new camera.

Keep it fun -- everybody has a camera of sorts today .... keep it fun; and, just maybe she might find it as a hobby or a profession... but too many people try to start out in 4th gear not knowing the machine had a 1st gear.

Keep it FUN
Since it is DIGITAL, Camera basics, work flow from picking up a camera and choosing a lens to the post processing and archiving or deleting a picture, computers & peripheals... software ... There is no one book or a quick fix to be photographer... Enjoy the journey... I did not list specifics because you have to choose the path and where you want to go....
HAve FUN... Look at the big picture of photography first, then pick out where you need to start to get from A to your desired destination (s).
Go to
Jan 8, 2013 10:25:46   #
LoisCroft wrote:
Someone emailed me the attached photo and asked me to make it into a nice picture. He's also very particular about it being perfect although it does not need to be large. I'm not having a lot of success with it. I'm attaching the original file. I can lighten it in photoshop, adjust the contrast etc., but is there anything else anyone can think of to do to save this picture for him?


Hello,
When I downloaded picture you have here to my downloads on my mac deck, "thumbnail" 16kb -- small pic and information lacking...

Although the word "Impossible" is cut our of my dictionaries, you need the "original" picture that the photographer took to do anything satisfactory to this picture.. I might say this pic is better than no picture at all .... disregarding the technical aspects of photography. One could, in camera raw, take out some of noise, and then transport to photo shop and use levels on it and then do some sharpening... but I would not waste my time on what I downloaded ( too small )


Go to
Jan 6, 2013 16:14:09   #
aweiss wrote:
Looking for courses/suggestions on learning Photoshop CS5...

Thank you,
Alan


Alan,
I went from PC to MAC desktop and learned LR, Photoshop CS5 extended, etc through various ways -- NAPP is an association which you can join for $79 - $99 / year and Scott Kelby is the CEO. Price gets you membership, many discounts, photoshop magazine, etc... If you sign up tell them Ed Steinmetz sent you and I will also get an additional two months attached onto my membership.. ;=) Everyone I have referred to NAPP has thanked me many times over. Great instructors and great association -- most bang for the buck.

Lynda is another group online -- that cost usually about $25/mo... and you can tackle each subject in a sequential manner from beginning to end . Great instructors also.

Shane Goldberg of photoshop zoo is another person that is certified adobe expert... great... but I like access to more than 1 person instructing, like in NAPP above or Lynda ( Lynda cost more money )

To supplement any of the above you can always utube google. But I do believe either NAPP ( National Association of Photoshop Professionals ) or Lynda will get you set up right to begin with and then you can explore out from there.

Good luck,
Ed
Go to
Jan 4, 2013 17:16:20   #
elf wrote:
Thanks guys, I see that my camera has shot more than 4,900 times. How many times will it shoot? I have herd 100,000, is that correct?
Tks Ed


Everyone is concerned about shutter actuations -- consider the sensor... it ages with the camera too... sometimes more than shutter ...
Go to
Dec 30, 2012 15:59:29   #
CJsFotos wrote:
I am looking for good prices on 2.8 lenses one portrait like 85mm And other telephoto 28-300 or 70-200 ?? Or suggestions and brands Thanks ,


Your D7000-- keep in mind your camera has a crop factor of 1.5.
Depending on what shooting your are doing, I would stick with all FX lenses, as you can use on both your DX and maybe later a DX body, if you happen to purchase such in future.

I shoot nikon; and, have used other lenses, but prefer to stay with the nikon lenses of best quality. Another brand that is great is the Tokina Pro lenses. I would look at Tokina PRO lenses ( very high quality build ) over other 3rd party lenses.... first.

In my collection of lenses, I have all that you mention--
The 85mm image stabilization VR ( FX)
the 28-300 image stabilization VR II (FX)
the 70-200 image stabilization VR II (FX)

There are really no short cuts is buying a good lens...
Go to
Dec 30, 2012 15:34:47   #
cwnlsl wrote:
I ordered the cotton carrier, but find that I cannot seem to make it work with the colar on the lense. Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm open to any method of carrying the camera, with the lense and the color.

Thanks for your help!
Charlotte


STRESS:
regardless whether your nikon camera is a DX or FX, when carrying the camera(s) with heavy lenses attached, it is advisable to not let the camera hang from any strap with lens hanging... according to nikon. When a strap is attached to bottom of camera and lens is attached to camera, the stress of such weight is really not good on the lens mount of the camera...


"For some reason photographers like to pack their lenses attached to their camera bodies. For some even stranger reason photographers seem to pack their longer, heavier, lenses attached to their camera bodies. Why do photographers pack this way? I have no idea.
When you pack your equipment you should think of Sir Isaac Newton and his theory that an object in motion will remain in motion until something stops the motion. Another way to look at this is that that a force of impact on your camera will need to dissipate that force.
Newton’s theory looks something like this: see attached pic


So what does this mean for photographers when they pack their 70-200f2.8 attached to their Nikon D700 body? It means that if your bag should sustain an impact the force through your camera, or through your lens, will transfer from one object to the next, often damaging the weakest link. What is usually the weakest link between a camera and a lens? The mount!
If your bag is dropped, knocked, hit, or otherwise ‘whacked’ your camera body can be spun one way while your lens is spun another way. The result of this impact is you torquing the two mounts significantly damaging both your camera and your lens.
If you pack your body and your lens separately the twisting motion of the camera body and the lens are only felt by the body and the lens individually. The impact dissipates into the padding of the bag. Since neither your camera body or your lens is attached to the bag there is no damage to either the camera or the lens.
I have heard many photographers say, “If my camera is attached to my lens then I can act faster to capture the photo.” I have news for you, if you need to put your backpack down, open the flap and remove your camera and lens kit……….you’ve already ‘missed the moment.’
In news and fast paced situations and I can’t think of a single moment where I thought, “if only my camera and lens were attached in my bag I might have captured that image.”
Fleeting moments happen non-stop.

You’ll see photos all day long if you’re looking, and if that is your intention you need to travel with your cameras out, on your shoulders, ready to shoot.

When you pack your equipment you need to pack it securely. Pack your gear relatively snug so it does not bounce. You need to maximize your space in small area of a bag, backpack or rolling case.
Not only does traveling with your lens attached to your camera significantly increase the chances of damaging your camera equipment while traveling, but it also decreases your packing flexibility. When you pack your camera body and your lenses detached from each other you increase the space in your bag to pack more effectively. By having each item separate you are no longer packing ‘around a camera-lens combo,’ you are free to stand lenses up, stack lenses, lay lenses down, adjust the location of our camera body within the bag.

All of these elements make for a safer and more practical way to pack your equipment ..."

Remember This: Just because others purchase "equipment" to "suspend their camera with heavy lenses " when not in use does not make it a good idea for you -- The "stress" will take its toll on your camera equipment.... at your expense sooner or later, or the person that purchases your equipment in the future.


Go to
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 29, 2012 13:46:08   #
Shutter Bugger wrote:
Why are prices of the Nikon D700 $500 more than the D800?


The D700 is no longer available according to B&H ( although in Europe maybe ) -- therefore if one finds a new D700, regardless from whom you purchase it, it may be higher than the D800, because of supply and demand -- although the D700 camera is now considered "older technology" when compared with D800,D800e, D600, D4 it is still used by many photographers

Take a look at this video from some quick test(s) comparisons.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPyYm38AC7Y

Note: in the last 6 months, I have noticed that the D700 camera, if new, has gone up in price. B&H also indicates no longer available as of the looking today. Although the D700 camera, is " older now ", still a nice FX camera and compatible with the dx D300

My preferences: D4, the D800 models, and the D600, and the D700 -- as I have all the cameras from the D50 to current, it depends on how, what purpose, and where you are going to use
any camera you decide to purchase. \
I HAVE NOT purchased any of my camera bodies or lenses on line -- rather I purchase at authorized nikon dealers ( brick and mortar stores ). In regard to Amazon etc, I have purchased other items and have good luck; albeit, regardless of whom one buys any items, it is always a good idea to shop around, sometimes disregarding the well intended opinions of some people -- do ones own homework before making any purchase.


Good nikon lenses are always a good investment, if shooting with nikon cameras...


Go to
Dec 26, 2012 16:16:07   #
Chuck 35 wrote:
First time on Forum:
I read with interest about PhotoKenetic's focus problem with his Nikon D-90 live view when shooting macros.

MT Shooter's answer was to tether to a laptop. Could MT or someone explain exactly how this is donewith the D-90


I happen to shoot with nikon cameras --
Tethering to a lap top is fantastic, albeit, some do not do it because they say it is to slow.

Light room 3 & 4 allow you to tether to a lap top or computer -- I like tethering to computer, desktop or laptop, because I it can be much more trustworthy than the LCD on back of any digital camera; and you can do quick adjustments for similar shots ahead of the actual shooting, say in my studio.

PS: I do not use aperture although on my computer to tether, although one is able, I have heard.




NOTE: Some programs ( whether tethering or others ) are only supported by certain operating systems and required certain system requirements -- any time somebody suggest a " program, first, " always " look at the system requirements, including the operating system(s) that supports these programs.
Go to
Dec 18, 2012 11:01:25   #
kurme wrote:
I have a d3100 and i was hoping someone here could tell me if it would be a good investment to upgrade to a d7000?
I have the 24-70 2.8 and a 50 1.4 lens and the guy at the camera store said i would get better pics with those lens and a d7000. I think my pics turn out nice but it would also be nice to have more control buttons on the camera instead of digging thru menus. I would also like to use off camera flash wireless. I love my d3100 but if i get better image quality in studio i have no problem upgrading even to full frame. I just want a opinion from here to make sure the store is not just looking for a sale. Thanks for your time:)
I have a d3100 and i was hoping someone here could... (show quote)


What is the end result that you want from your shooting -- Studio primarily -- lenses are the best investment regardless what shooting you -- maybe one can consider an investment.

If you went full frame, but I would not most likely, although I have all nikon cameras from D50 onward... to the latest... it must be good marketing or my curiosity won out over costs.


Again it is usually the person behind the camera rather than camera and all its "goodies ". Some are using iphone in their studio now... no kidding.

Regarding Nikon camera bodies -- They no longer make some dx bodies- for instance the D50 and the D300;albeit, they no longer in production, the D50 was a great camera as was the D300 in correct lighting. The D3, an FX body, is no longer in production, yet it is a great camera.

What you are going to do or do with your pictures will help you determine which camera you will purchase. Do not buy a D3X if you are going to shoot pictures for people that want you to relay the pictures to their iphone.

Really, you will find price between d3100 (14mp) and d7000 (16.2mp) , about $400 and & 800 respectively for the bodies only. If you are shooting in studio primarily -- either camera will work great with your lenses. Save your monies, do not get wrapped up in the "coolness " of having the "artillery" of camera gear that I or someone else has or promotes. All Camera manufacturers want their inventory in your inventory...

In studio, On a full frame, I shoot with a nikon 70-200 in studio, an 85 prime, or 105 prime. Lighting is very controlled in studio generally with elinchrome and RF control . I shoot with a nikon crop sensor sometimes... Depends on what you are trying to do and the effect you want.

Photography reminds me of my owning a boat, you can throw much money at it and it really does not improve it that much -- it is like throwing your money into a hole into the water.... Move slowly -- do not get caught up in the "HYPE". or bias of others, learn with what you have.

Experience over 40 yrs studio/outdoors/ weddings/portraiture.... I thought last night that I should just start shooting with a cell phone or point and shoot with less MP count so people can get photos more quickly on their iphones etc and other mobile devices.

There is no one way... there is always another way and it may be your way.
Go to
Dec 11, 2012 19:07:14   #
selmslie wrote:
tramsey wrote:

… This shows you haven't a clue what the 600 does. It is not dust it is oil. …


Actually, I do have a clue. If you search outside of this forum you will see that both the oil problem and the dust problem are discussed. The oil problem, if you have one, seems to go away after a while.

The dust problem will always be there, it is a part of the game. If you do not have a dust problem you are lucky, you don’t use your camera that much, you don’t change lenses often or you are not very observant.

Nikon is aware of the problem so it might be better to wait a few months before purchasing.

The D7000 and D800 also had an oil problem. The Canon 5D Mark III also has a dust and light leak problem.
quote=tramsey br … This shows you haven't a clue... (show quote)



I stand with Nikonian72 on this D600. And that is the advantage of buying new -- warranty. Think about those selling D600 to other purchasers and they have no warranty ( unless, like some seem to think, have the seller send it in if there is a problem within the warranty period -- )... Not my way of doing business, albeit, others find it satisfactory sometimes.

The manufacturer should step up to the plate to find a solution to a known and repetitive problem... such as the lubricant getting onto the sensor.

Even if one learns to clean their cameras sensor -- there are risks taken if you do not do it all the time. Even Pro Photo sends their cameras out to specific shops in Portland, Oregon, to clean a customer's digital camera sensor. Pro Photo said it is just to much liability to do it themselves... They told me who did it for them and I have all my nikon DX and FX sensor cleaned when needed ( $50 for FX and $100 for FX -- includes cleaning camera up too and if not done well they perform over if necessary at no expense to camera owner ).

If one wants to buy a faulty product, knowing it is faulty, one is not doing the industry's customers any favors in the short or long term.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15 next>>
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.