That's because he didn't write it. He read what someone else wrote. Not sure about his "stellar delivery". I didn't hear it, but usually he reads in monotone. He may have spoke some conservative positions, but he personally does not have any principles. If you really want to know his positions, listen to his tweets, what he says at a news conference or a rally, and what others that have worked for him have said about him. His main concern is getting reelected so he can stay away from prosecutors and so he can enrich himself and his family. He has conned many Republicans into believing he cares about the old Republican values. He does not. He only cares about himself.

"Team of Vipers" by Cliff Sims
"Too Much and Never Enough" by Mary L. Trump
"A Very Stable Genius" by Philip Rucker and Carol Leoning
"Disloyal" by Michael Cohen,
"H**x" by Brian Stelter,
"Melania and Me" by Stephanie Winston Wolkoff (mainly the last 100 pages about the inaugural dollars that are unaccounted for)

I suggest you go to the DPReview-Studio Shot Comparison where you can compare images take with the Sony RX10IV with other cameras you are considering.

https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=sony_dscrx10iv&attr13_1=panasonic_dmcfz2500&attr13_2=apple_iphonex&attr13_3=apple_iphonex&attr15_0=jpeg&attr15_1=jpeg&attr15_2=jpeg&attr15_3=jpeg&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&attr16_2=32&attr16_3=32&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.4105642256902761&y=-0.6561459606884227

Thererfore: GAS in motion is good!

Well, you do have the eye in this one, but the other one has better body color and better flower color. So, it's a tossup. If you are on the fence, keep both of them. You can always delete them later when you get a better shot, but you cannot resurrect them if you delete them now.

Tough call, a personal decision, but I think I would flush it, and continue the quest for a better one. Yes, you need the eye of the bird. JMO

I use DXO Photolab 3 to process RAW and Photoshop Elements to refine the image. Works well for me. No subscription fees.

Of the three you mentioned, I prefer DXO Photolab 3. Some comments.
1. Do not like software that creates a catalog, such as Lightroom. DXO does not create a catalog, so I can use the existing folder structure in Window Explorer to navigate through my photos.
2 Like DXOs denoising capability.
3. With DXO, the levers used to adjust exposure, contrast, etc can be moved by clicking on the handle and moving the wheel on the mouse. This allows for incremental adjustments. I don't like software that causes the handle to jump to the position of the mouse. Just my preference.
4. I do not like the method DXO uses for local adjustments, however. The adjustment levers are very small and difficult to move precisely. I actually like ON1s process for handling local adjustments.
5. I use DXO only for RAW files and use PS Elements for more detailed adjustments.
6. I think ON1 has better learning options with the many videos about their software. DXO could use some improvement there.
7. I tried Luminar, but I cannot remember why I did not choose it when I was reviewing RAW processing software.
8. I don't know what kind of camera you are using, but if you are using Canon, you could consider using Digital Photo Professional 4 software free from Canon. I used it for a while and still use it for culling raw photos when I shoot Canon.

In the end, you should download all three of these, try them, and select whatever suits you the best. I think you can download and use any of these free for 30 days.

Yep, it's a booby. Should have looked on my iNaturalist app on my iPhone. I hate when my phone is smarter than I am.

Based on the eyes, I think it is a northern gannet, not seen too often in Florida, but possible. I assume you saw it over the ocean shoreline somewhere?

I need to clarify that I did not create this "photo". Ran into it on the internet.

Hey, I didn't mean to start a fight. Just a little humor for the day.

But I think it does show the dilemma that some people are facing. I actually have a couple Canon DSLRs and a Sony mirrorless a6400. Like them all. I'm at the Y in the road and trying to decide if I should get a full frame Sony and get rid of the Canons or go the mirrorless route with Canon.

Another point unrelated to camera brands. This "photo" (with a little manipulation on the sign), shows what great composition can do for a photo. No words are needed. The photo tells the whole story. IMO, great composition always trumps a technically perfect photo.

Now please don't take this to the subject of Trump!

No, it doesn't. I just thought this "photo" was funny.

Canon or Sony