How easy it is to dupe the right wingers. They live in a mythical world, fear the unknown and progress. Deny science and history yet accept the rantings of a proven liar!
An example of where a city or state who is holding an incarcerated person who is an illegal has not notified the fed!
SteveS wrote:
The federal statue states: if the accused actually harbored or concealed the fugitive, and (4) that the accused intended to prevent the fugitive' s discovery or arrest.
If a sanitary city knowingly has an illegal retained within their prison system, and fails to notify the federal authorities, they are harboring, or concealed that illegal from discovery or arrest. What is so hard to understand about that?
You asked for the law, I provided that. You may not agree with it, but that doesn't mean it's not the law.
The federal statue states: if the accused actually... (
show quote)
But, But, these people are seeking asylum. Look up the law on that! The cities and the state are not encouraging these people to come they are simply saying that the as cities and states are not in the business of enforcing federal law!
SteveS wrote:
Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for any person who -- knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of t***sportation.
Encouraging/Inducing -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an offense for any person who -- encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law.
Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v) expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.
Harboring -- Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes i... (
show quote)
the food stamp amt is nil name other welfare programs. The fires were on federal lands! You really are ignorant of reality!
travelwp wrote:
That's fair. Do you think Sanctuary Cities can afford food stamps, other welfare programs and the cost of the wildfires ?
So you say but not those who study the climate!
FOOL
EyeSawYou wrote:
Just pointing out your illiteracy and your lack of reading comprehension. Its funny, neither of my prior responses to you did I mention Fox News nor Trump, what is fixation on the two? Also, it is you that demonstrated your obvious lack of knowledge in respect to c*****e c****e or g****l w*****g. Please refrain from discussing that which you are ignorant of, specifically c*****e c****e, son.
Again... So, when there's a record setting cold snap, its just weather. When there's a record setting heat snap, its definitely man created/caused g****l w*****g. lol
Just pointing out your illiteracy and your lack of... (
show quote)
FOOL
You have the understanding of a flea! You are a jingoist and a parrot. Have you any original thoughts?
EyeSawYou wrote:
So, when there's a record setting cold snap, its just weather. When there's a record setting heat snap, its definitely man created/caused g****l w*****g. lol
The US entered the war because it was attacked. In fact it was isolationist prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor. Isolationism is diametrically opposed to nationalism.
Nationalism is the belief that one nation is superior to another and therefore has the right to subject other nations. Patriotism on the other hand is a belief that one adheres to a nation's principals or underlying beliefs.
jgunkler wrote:
I beg your pardon but let's not rewrite history. It was American nationalism (putting America first) that prevented is from saving the world until Pearl Harbor forced us to wake up and notice that the rest of the world was really in trouble.
Your rights are only as deep as your pockets!
Wait a minute that is the tabloid that recently reported seeing Elvis buying pink undies in Harrods!
idaholover wrote:
You just lost the argument...
Nuttin but a bunch of poor Catholic boys wanting a better life and a chance to v**e Democrat...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7795061/honduran-gangs-infiltrating-migrant-caravans-bloody-violence-america/
You are the most easily duped man on the planet!
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-saudi-arabia-financial-interests-ties-hotel-bookings-sales-2018-10
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-10-17/trump-and-kushner-put-saudi-arabia-s-money-ahead-of-khashoggi
I could go on but it make no difference you are a member of the cult called believing the liar in chief!
EyeSawYou wrote:
Tell us what investments Trump has in Saudi Arabia.
Me I'm cheap. I have a Sony a6000 and a bunch of legacy glass that costs very little. Of course I have to manually focus but that is relatively easy with the Sony. For $1800 you can get the camera and about 10 lenses.
Seems like a lot of money to lay barbed wire!
Hell could have gotten some illegal labor for about $100,00!
You will get many suggestions and all of them good. But, if you can, talk to the young lady and learn what she wants! What are her specifications must it fit in a hand bag or does she want to wear the camera around her neck. Will she take it to the pool, ocean or lake? What does she think she want to take photos of? In short, don't make a blind suggestion!
Saleavitt10 wrote:
A co-worker's 16 y/o has expressed an interest in photography. She wants to graduate from cellphone selfies! I'm thinking a small point and shoot with a moderate focal length range. Since I have no experience with them I am tossing it out to you knowledgeable folks for some ideas to pass on. This will be a Christmas gift. She didn't really have a price range in mind but if it were my kid I would probably stay in the $200-$300 price range in case it is a passing fancy.
Thanks in advance!
A co-worker's 16 y/o has expressed an interest in ... (
show quote)
You forget that the President does not control the budget but the GOP congress did.
Raise Example Basic Pay Change View Pay Table
2017 2.1% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $62.70
2016 1.3% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $38.40
2015 1.0% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $29.10
2014 1.0% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $28.80
2013 1.7% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $48.30
2012 1.6% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $44.70
2011 1.4% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $38.70
2010 3.4% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $90.90
2009 3.9% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $100.20
2008 3.5% An E-5 member with over 8 years of service would receive a monthly raise of $87.00
Did a lot better under Obama!
Guess what you have been lied to again and the interesting thing is that you believe the Liar in Chief
C
EyeSawYou wrote:
Trump made a mistake in not observing Veterans Day and he does regret it. To claim he h**es the Military as Keenan did on his pathetic thread is just pure BS. Tell me, who fought to give the Military more money than Obama ever did? By the way, does Obama h**e the police because of what he said?
Dont forget Adorama and Roberts
hillary wrote:
Thanks, have done business with B&H but other is new to me.