Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Anandnra
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20 next>>
Feb 10, 2016 15:59:44   #
mwsilvers wrote:
The manual for the Canon 7D Mark II is 549 pages. I'm sure the 5D3 manual is a similar length. I've read my 7D2 manual from cover to cover. If I hadn't I would have missed out on dozens of very useful configuration options and features that are not obvious and which were unlikely to have been discovered on my own.


Agreed - it's been on my to do list but somehow never can get motivated enough to do it. Just following threads like these we pick up things along the way.
Go to
Feb 10, 2016 14:15:29   #
DBaltzer wrote:
Another reason to read the manual. I upgraded from the Canon 5D MKII to the Canon 5D MKIII 18 months ago. Didn't feel the need to read the manual page by page since I knew the MKII inside and out and so I just scanned through it. Imagine my surprise when I saw another photographer display a two way (side to side and tilt) electronic level on the LCD monitor on his 5D MKIII. Went home and pulled out the manual and there on page 60 were the instructions for activating the level (push menu button once then info button twice). For 18 months I've been using a manual level that snaps into the hot shoe. Doh! I'm posting this not to demonstrate my ignorance but because I've since talked to two other friends of mine who have MKIII's and they didn't know about the level either. So just in case there's another Hogger out there with a Canon 5D MKIII who like me, doesn't read manuals, this post is for you.
Another reason to read the manual. I upgraded from... (show quote)


That would be me as well not reading the manual and figuring things out on my own..... thanks for the tip,
Go to
Feb 8, 2016 20:46:48   #
PattyW60 wrote:
IT just came! Gonna let it warm up a bit before I open the box. :)


I share your excitement - enjoy and have fun.
Go to
Feb 8, 2016 15:51:30   #
PattyW60 wrote:
After 2 years of saving $ and finally deciding which lens would best suit my needs, I ordered a new Canon 100-400LII on Friday and it's on the truck to be delivered today!! I'm very excited!! When I first started saving for a lens, I was sure it would be the 70-200 f/2.8LII, but after getting a great refurb deal on the 24-105, I started wondering if I'd be happy with only another 95mm in reach. Then, the new 100-400 came out... I still had to decide which I needed/wanted more - speed or reach. Since I shoot more outside, I went with reach. I also reached out to a fellow UHH forum member for his advice, and coupled with reading all of the various threads here, I feel I made the wisest decision for me. I'd still love that 70-200 some day, buy maybe version I. Thank you, everyone, for posting your various questions and concerns about different lenses. I read them all, and it really helped my thinking process! :)
After 2 years of saving $ and finally deciding whi... (show quote)


Here's one of a cayote in the Smokies using this lens on the 7d2. This is heavily cropped, shot from about 250 to 300 yards away.


(Download)
Go to
Feb 7, 2016 13:34:46   #
UXOEOD wrote:
Help please, a friend Canon is suddenly broken. She is considered sending it off to KEH in Smyrna GA, anyone know these folks. What kind of reputation goes here?

Thanks in advance.


Have not had experience with their service department but can attest to the company as a very reputable place to deal with. Have both sold and bought equipment from them with satisfactory results.
Go to
Feb 5, 2016 07:51:53   #
ofwiah wrote:
I have a 7D Mark II that is less than 2 months old. It is a nice camera. I am considering selling it and getting a 5D MarkIII for this reason. If I read the reports right, the 5D Mark III is a better all around camera. I guess I am looking for higher IQ and not so much as 10fps.

Your thoughts.


I use both and most of the time I have no reservations of picking up either one. Generally I have the mid range lens either the 24-105 or the 24-70 on the 5d3 and either the 70-200 or the 100-400 on the 7d2 and pick up the right one for the reach at the given moment. The 5d3 however is my go to body and gets the majority of the work.
Go to
Feb 3, 2016 15:43:18   #
Photographer Jim wrote:
I bought the cotton carrier about a year ago and have been very pleased with it. It is very comfortable, and versatile for those occasions when I am hiking in terrain where a traditional backpack might cause problems or limit my access to my equipment (i.e. Sand dunes, wet environments).

It's number one advantage for me is the comfort it affords when I am hiking. It takes most strain off of my shoulders, and allows natural movement. I've had no problems with safety concerns. I make sure the insurance straps are always secure. The only close call I have had was when the camera slipped from my hand when taking it off the carrier to set it up on my tripod. The safety strap saved me. The drop was my doing not the design of the carrier.

The only negative I found with using a cotton carrier had to do with the fact that all of my camera bodies are equipped with L brackets. The lug of the carrier makes using the L bracket difficult. It results in the camera sitting cockeyed in the carrier, or you must go the route of detaching the lug each time you want to set the camera up on a tripod. The solution was to get an Arca Swiss clamp from RRS. I mounted the clamp to the lug of the cotton carrier, and simply fasten my camera into the clamp. It works like a charm, and with the safety straps of the carrier the camera is very secure while still being extremely accessible. As a result I can benefit from the comfort and versatility that the carrier provides.
I bought the cotton carrier about a year ago and h... (show quote)


Jim, I saw your gallery - excellent work.
Go to
Feb 3, 2016 11:56:14   #
digit-up wrote:
What's the word out there on use of camera carriers, like the "cotton carrier" Do those seem to be very beneficial? Anyone have any opinion and experience with them?? I hope that they are as handy as they seem, since the "brown" visits this afternoon, with a double camera version/ Buyers remorse.....Maybe?? RJM


I have been using it for about a year and a half now. Here's my take on it. I am an active user, use it while hiking and on long travel journeys as well where I tend to walk around with 2 sets of equipment for 10-14 hrs at a stretch. I mount the long lens to the unit that's on the chest and the shorter lens on the hip holster. So far, I have very little that I don't like about the Coton Carrier system - perhaps other than looking like being in a commando unit as I walk around towns. Recently, I was in Turkey toting my outfit and didn't look too far different than the commando officers walking around Istanbul. Initially my family gave me a lot of grief for walking around like that but knowing how much it has balanced the weight I carry around and the less stress it puts on my back, they have backed off.

It is a very purposeful and convenient harness to use - I too observed the nut that is mounted on the base going into the holster at the bottom getting loose once initially, but proper alignment and tightening took care of it. Make sure you align the arrow as suggested prior to tightening as that will ensure the camera going in straight down into the harness and as it turns around from gravitational forces it'll lock in. Every once in a while I may have to realign and tighten if I am not diligent in turning the system perpendicular while taking it out. Obviously when you have a 100-400 mounted on your chest you have to use proper judgement while bending, not much unlike if you are carrying one around on a strap, atleast here it is locked on your chest and not dangling around.

I have modified the insurance straps with my own setup as I don't want to totally rely on the unit with the expensive equipment I carry around. I purchased a whole bunch of OP/Tech straps (B&H and Amazon carry them) that are modular to suit my needs. You don't really need to do that but something I felt comfortable with. Hope this helps.
Go to
Jan 31, 2016 23:55:34   #
LFingar wrote:
I have 5 Canon L zooms covering from 16mm to 400mm, so, coverage isn't an issue. I also have both a full frame 6D and an APS-C 7DII, so my lens usage would cover both formats. I have 1 prime, an EF 35mm f/1.4 L, which I really like in certain circumstances.
I started looking at 50mm primes and then thought about 85mm. I wouldn't mind going with the L versions, if the benefits justify the cost, but that doesn't seem to be the case. The 50mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.8 both get high marks for IQ, but the 50 seems to have reliability problems. I shoot a bit of everything and my zooms have served me well, but I want to start learning more about primes. Anyone have experience with these lenses? BTW, I'm a Canon guy and prefer to stay Canon but might consider a Sigma or Tamron.
I have 5 Canon L zooms covering from 16mm to 400mm... (show quote)


LF; We have pretty much the same equipment list if we change out your 6D for my 5D3. I recently picked up the 85 1.2 from Laura here on the hog and have since shot 1 wedding with it. I can tell you that it is not an easy lens to use ... and I am still learning and have a long way to go to get the best of it ... but boy, when you get it right on there's no looking back. While my hit ratio is getting better, the sharpness and the bokeh is very attractive. As good as the 70-200 is, the 85 blows it out when its right on. The 85 1.2 is much slower on the focus to bear in mind.
Go to
Jan 30, 2016 18:35:14   #
bcmink wrote:
Your homeowner's policy will not cover high end photography gear. You'll need a separate rider from your current insurance carrier. I use State Farm. In order to obtain a policy I had to provide a complete list with serial numbers for each item and the original purchase invoice. I'm also required to edit the list if I sell or acquire new items that need to be insured. The rider is a full replacement policy with a reasonable deductible.

The annual premium cost is not inexpensive, but frankly, if I had even a small portion of the gear stolen the annual premium would seem insignificant.
Your homeowner's policy will not cover high end ph... (show quote)


I too have State Farm and instead of a rider on my Home Owner's Policy, I chose to get a Personal Articles Policy separately from my Home Owner's and it has full coverage with no deductible for losses and breakages - world wide.
Go to
Jan 29, 2016 09:20:38   #
Tracy B. wrote:
I did it. I ordered it. It will be here Tuesday. I can hardly wait.


You can't go wrong with this lens.
Go to
Jan 27, 2016 13:29:13   #
susanmary wrote:
Looking to buy CANON lens: EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM


I have one I can let go - have had it for about 3 years. Bought new as a breakup from a kit. In excellent condition but for some minor scuffs on the lens cap and the hood, just returned from an international trip and used it as the primary lens. Just prior to Christmas bought the 24-70 2.8ii when Canon was having a refurbed sale and will have less need for this. I want $550 for it (firm), if you are interested. I can send you links to albums with results from this lens. PM me.
Go to
Jan 23, 2016 16:19:45   #
etwizard wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a good wide angle lense for a Canon 7D. Any recommendations?
Thanks
Solomon


The EF11-24F4L, if you can swing that ..... It's on my radar when it gets to 2499 or less ...
Go to
Jan 3, 2016 15:38:39   #
stringplayer wrote:
So when I first told my wife I was interested in an Amazon trip, she thought I was talking about visiting an amazon.com distribution center. Can't blame her; I'm about the least likely person around to be found trekking through a jungle! Anyway, in a couple of months we will be headed to Iquitos in NW Peru to begin our week-long Amazon adventure. The ship sleeps 32. Skiffs will take us where the waters are too shallow for the ship. And there will be a number of jungle hikes lasting three to four hours each max. The question - given heat, terrain, etc. - is one of lenses. I plan to take my D810 with a Nikon 28-300 f3.5-5.6 lens for my basic all-purpose set up. The question (and I realize it is one of stamina and personal preference) is whether it is worth the weight, bulk, hassle, etc. to take along my Sigma 150-600 C f5-6.3 as well. Any thoughts?

Thanks much.

sp
So when I first told my wife I was interested in a... (show quote)


I have done a similar trip from Iquitos and the 28-300 is more than sufficient.
Go to
Jan 1, 2016 08:25:36   #
mcmm wrote:
I know this question is never ending but am asking for input anyway.
Current camera T3i. Planning to purchase new camera and need advice.
I take tons of photos of kids at school, family, sports (not professional) and landscapes. In other words, pretty much everything. These are the lenses available for use: Canon 50mm f1.2, Canon 24-70 f2.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8. Cameras I am looking at (all Canon's): 6Ti, 6Ts, 70d, 7dmarkII.
A FF camera isn't in the budget at this time (spent the money on lenses). PP programs, PSCS5, Elements 13, Lightroom 4.4. I have looked at all the comparison sites that have been listed before and still can't make a decision. All considered which camera would you suggest?
Sorry to keep beating the subject to death but when it is personal we all want to hear the answers again!!!!
I know this question is never ending but am asking... (show quote)


7D2
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 20 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.