Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: JCam
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 271 next>>
Oct 14, 2018 11:53:03   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I've been getting email from eBay about this for quite a while. Why wouldn't politicians want to collect more tax? Eventually, if you live in NY and make a purchase from a seller in CA, you'll have to pay sales tax on that. Yes, you will have to pay state sales tax on a sale that did not take place in your state. And that makes sense?


Jerry, Most sales tax laws are titled as Sales & Use taxes so if you buy something out of state, and the seller doesn't collect your state taxes, the law requires you to pay the amount of tax directly to your state. Some years ago when we had a small business and were undergoing a Sales Tax Audit, the auditor told me that it was the shortest customer line in the Government.

With the Supreme Court changing its position so all states are free to collect such taxes; it may be reasonable to check the comparative tax rates for large cost purchases. NY tax is, I believe, about 8.85% whereas our tax in MD is 6.0%--$1.15 per $100 or $.25 per hundred so a single ink Canon CLT-8 ink will be $0.02 more, hardly worth the trouble for individual cartridges, but if buying in bulk....?

Just as an aside, did you know the NYC sales tax was introduced shortly after the start of WW II AS A TEMPORARY TAX to help offset some of the city's war costs? IT WAS TO BE REVOKED AT THE END OF THE WAR!
Go to
Sep 25, 2018 11:42:14   #
speters wrote:
If that is a common thing with that battery, I would toss that thing in the trash! You obviously got what you paid for, not worth destroying your camera over.
I have never used any third party batteries, but lots of folks are happy with them. I think one of the brands many people use is Wasabi.


When making the choice, OEM or Knock-offs just remember that the OEM batteries are mostly not made by the camera manufacturer; they buy them in bulk made to their OEM's specs by one of the 'knock off" makers. When I bought my Canon DSLR it came with a Canon brand, and I bought a spare & charger from B & H. Both are about five years old, still work, seem to hold about the same amount of charge, and in the field I can't tell the difference. When I need replacements, I'll go to B & H and get their recommendation. If you buy by price alone, as speters you will get what you paid for; the days of all carbon/zink batteries being basically alike are long gone.
Go to
Sep 25, 2018 11:28:14   #
evajohnson wrote:
Hi I have been researching cameras and it is blowing my mind.
From experience, what would be a great compact camera with the best quality pictures?
Don't care for Wifii, or uploading to internet.
Don't need a lot of hupla. Just a great camera.
Would appreciate any advise.
Don't mind learning curve. Need to grow


First, I think you should decide WHAT YOU NEED IN A CAMERA, not what you don't. When you know the want parameters, then if there is a good camera store in your area, make a visit and see what's available or as a secondary choice a big box store such as Best Buy. Their inventory volume is usually pretty good and you may even get a sales person that knows what he/she is selling. Then post your specific questions on here.
Go to
Sep 20, 2018 10:52:25   #
ditchdigger wrote:
I am 92 years old, in hospice care for terminal cancer and I still enjoy life. I can still sit on my front and back porches and shoot pictures of whatever wild life comes around. My hands are still as steady as they were 50 years ago...good because I have no tripod. I have only the beginners pp program that came with my camera so I only shoot jpegs and sometimes touch them up a little bit and do a lot of cropping. I want to show you a few bird shots I took last evening just before sunset. The light kept changing so I used manual with auto ISO....something I learned from you hedgehogs. You will have to excuse the bird poop on the wall ( some one is bound to mention it) because I have no tool to get rid of it. My daughter washes it off about once a week...probably tomorrow. So here goes! (Sony RX10IV)
Kent
I am 92 years old, in hospice care for terminal ca... (show quote)


Ditchdodger,

We are working under similar circumstances, but I have a few years before I'm officially "a survivor". I am in my late 70's and was diagnosed with Pancreatic cancer in January and started Chemo in Feb. The first dose was a disaster, and I ended up in the hospital for ten days to get my systems back in sync then ten more says of twice a week PT to regain strength, stamina, and balance. The changed and reduced the every two week dosage and now all seems well with no pain and little discomfort; and the cancer markers have declined from just under 10,000 in February to just over 100 this week; the Dr. and I are both thrilled!

About your photos we too share a situation there. I'm not quite as as limited you indicate your condition. I still drive, get out with my spouse--shopping or to dinner (on occasion)--but had to leave mu boat 'on the hard' this season so my photography is mostly of what ever I can see from the house or patio in or at the edge of the forest behind the house, and sometimes a Sailboat race off the yacht club on the other side of the river so it is mostly an escape rather than capturing many good shots. Unfortunately the forest is too far away too, about 100+ feet from either, so my longest lens-- full frame Tamron 70-300mm even on my crop sensor camera is a bit shy of what I need for tack sharp shots of song birds and the occasional hawk, and my hands haven't been all that steady since my late 60's so I'm always shooting with a fairly fast shutter priority and if using the Tamron a flexible ISO limited to 800 so like you I do a lot of cropping and PP with PSE 14. I do have a tripod, but hate using the darn (thing I'm being polite!), carrying it around and constantly resetting it when the birds don't wait is frustraring.

I love your photos especially understanding very well the situations they were taking under. You didn't quite say this, but I'd bet you too find the photography a great escape from the boring and tiring just sitting around the house.

Best Wishes and Good Luck!

Jim
Go to
Sep 18, 2018 11:25:07   #
You can also paint new colors with PSE; I use v.14, but I assume the later versions had the capability.
Go to
Sep 16, 2018 11:16:24   #
Nice shot and PP, but I can't really see much difference in the pre- and post processed version except for some sharpening especially around the "M" on the bow of the left vessel and some minor cropping on the left making for a tighter picture.

Question: Were these taken in the spring immediately after they were launched? In 60+ years of being on the water, I don't think I've ever seen three fishing vessels as spiffy clean and with little or no fishing gear visible.
Go to
Sep 9, 2018 13:37:34   #
aly1235 wrote:
One of my family members asked me to shoot their wedding after firing 2 photographers due to price. I told them I was unsure due to the fact I’m not even close to a professional and I basically shoot in auto most of the time (I know, I’m working on it). I took a few pictures of their dogs playing before and based on those pictures they decided I was a great photographer (see pics below). Anyway, I told them if they really needed me I would do my best but I could not promise anything and they said that was fine and they’d pay me a little too. So I’m asking those with experience for tips and tricks. I only have a canon t6, an 18-55 mm lens, a 75-300 mm lens, 0.43x wide angle lens 55mm and 2.2 x telephoto lens 52 mm. I wanted to buy an off camera flash but that is not an option for me right now due to money. I know I’m very limited on equipment but what lenses would be best for the ceremoney, reception, group shots, etc. Also, what settings should I have my camera on? I read on a few sites that aperture priority is best for weddings. Opinions? Thank you!!
One of my family members asked me to shoot their w... (show quote)


I'm not a pro either, but have done two family weddings with what equipment I had a -- Canon AE1 (35mm) and an separate flash for first & a Canon 60D with the built in flash the second time about six years later. So long as they realize that you are a bit out of your "comfort level" and some of the photos may not come out (you don't have to show them those) how upset can they be? I haven't had one complaint! Do it as a family obligation and tell them that the photos are a gift to the Bride & Groom! If others want copies and the parents probably will tell them you'll print them at cost (remember to add the Paper, Ink, other supplies & some time) because it isn't cheap to print a bunch of color prints, and you will be amazed at the PP time. One more suggestion--set the White balance for Auto; if you walk outside or to other venues, it will help. You won't forget to change the setting, and you might consider a fixed shutter speed and let the camera pick the f-stop.

Good luck!
Go to
Sep 9, 2018 13:05:59   #
Beautiful! Nicely done.
Go to
Sep 6, 2018 13:36:59   #
rook2c4 wrote:
Are you using a gmail account for your email? That may explain how Google would know about your activities and whereabouts.
I choose not to use gmail for that very reason, and generally avoid Google products whenever possible. Google is in the habit of being very intrusive in users' personal lives.


Rook, Thanks fpr the post; I have also noticed stuff that google has let slide through what used to be a reasonably good firewall and wondered "where did that come from?", including something called 'softgateon" that wants to install it on the computer as a PDF reader and has already blocked my Adobe reader. I intend to delete 'softgateon' once I get a chance to see if the Adobe still works; I'm still using Win & PRO.

Have you found a reasonable alternate to Gmail? I hate the thought of switching as I've been using it for 20+ years, and the number of contacts I have must be humongous.

Jim
Go to
Aug 22, 2018 11:41:41   #
al13 wrote:
Interesting, i handleded many a Jerry Can but never knew where the name came from. Also very familiar with the Jeep and it’s lack of a heater and propensity to turn over. Pictures are great bringing back memories. Our did not have the 50 cal gun.


Nice pictures and all the versions are well done, Congratulations!

The original Jeeps used in WWII & Korea were pretty steady, but the revised version introduced during VM, had the independent four wheel suspension and were rollover prone; it's been a long time but think they called it a model 51. The suspension allowed the body to remain level even as the suspension absorbed all the tip so the driver was clueless about a pending rollover. The first modification was to add safety belts, which in rollovers probably killed more troops than the original (couldn't jump off), next we were sent placards that said Not to Exceed 40(?) MPH and of course most drivers followed that (when an Officer was present), but the rollover rated didn't reduce much. By the time the 'new models' reached the Transportation Companies the N.D.G. word was out and the drivers were more careful. I got off Active Duty in '64 so I don't know subsequent history except that most 1/4 ton jeeps were shortly replaced by the new 3/4 ton trucks as company vehicles. The only complaints I heard on them was that they were too big to camouflage easily and quickly in company sized field areas.

Jcam
TC Officer
Go to
Aug 7, 2018 13:20:33   #
Streets wrote:
This term is one of the most subjective in all of Photography, so I am going to set everyone straight. From this day forward I will proclaim a 100% crop to be an uncropped image. Thus, a 50% crop is one that has half the pixel count, and a 25% crop will have 1/4 of the pixel count of the original image. Now, does everyone agree? I just can't wait for all the good, respectful replies that are sure to come.


I agree that the term is misleading, and is 100% inaccurate, but neither can I accept an erroneous use of percentages. Let me offer an example: you are alone and walking down some dark street in some not particularly reputable part of town and someone decides he needs your camera more than you and pulls a weapon--knife, pistol, club, whatever--from under his coat and tells you to give him 100% of your camera equipment; maybe he didn't pau attention to his 5th grade English or Math teachers. Hopefully you decide that your well being and possibly life is worth more than all the stuff he wants so you immediately hand it all (100%) over to him. You have just given him all of the equipment you were carrying and now have nothing--zero, nada, zilch--left. To strain the Queen's English a bit you have just "cropped" your equipment by 100% and have nothing left with you ! That is the same reduction as a 100% crop of a photo; there is nothing left! 100% of any number of pixels is all of them so if you do such a crop you would only have a blank sheet left.

WRITE THIS DOWN 100% OF ANYTHING EQUALS ALL OF IT! Always has been and always will be! Even the "New Math" that they tried to cram down our kids throats fifty years ago hasn't changed it. and it didn't take the kids long to figure it out.
Go to
Jul 31, 2018 14:33:46   #
Nikon1201 wrote:
People who say it’s hard don’t want to learn and produce quality work, they probably use Elements or Picassa. Take the step you won’t regret it.


You just blew off a lot of damn good photographers who just don't want to spend infinite hours on a computer (nic pros) to obtain perfection in their minds that will never be recognized or verbalized except here on UHH when the Poster asks for comment.
Go to
Jul 31, 2018 13:42:19   #
You have vastly changed the conditions of your first post, and even you must agree that the changes make a lot of difference. I have read the state statistics about lives saved by "packers", they are in mostly one-on-one in open spaces with plenty of room, not in a possibly crowded church which is probably the worst possible place for a shooter to be.

"Nuf said" on my part!
Go to
Jul 31, 2018 11:26:31   #
dennis2146 wrote:
Of course it could lead to injuries or death. Recently a trained police officer in a gun battle, shot and killed another officer. Surely you can admit the projected failure of the 92 year old woman with a 44 Magnum was stated simply to put forward the worst case scenario. Let’s instead offer a 28 year old young man, or woman, who is well trained in the use of firearms because of training in the USMC. They attend church too. These, what if’s, can be told anyway you like. They can be spun to make whatever scenario look good or bad. But in the real world there are many armed citizens who definitely have saved lives.

Dennis
Of course it could lead to injuries or death. Rece... (show quote)


This time I agree somewhat, but if you expand the scenario to perhaps some six 28 year old people all shooting in one direction and probably close over the heads of those who haven't "hit the deck" yet, it could still be that circular firing squad, And, yes. the police do make mistakes, today a town in the west is holding a funeral for an officer who was run down and killed at an accident scene by another officer who the reports said is now being held for second degree murder. Neither incident should have happened, especially without more information.
Go to
Jul 31, 2018 11:09:01   #
Rebel 1 wrote:
Quickchek New Jersey festival of ballooning at Solberg airport.


Nice shot, and to answer your question small towns are not immune from terrorism and need if not trained SWAT teams at least the ability to protect and get their officers a chance to get to the situation alive, and perhaps contain it until trained officers can get there. That vehicle would probably stop any caliber round a terrorist might be using!

A DEAD office would cost the town a lot more than that vehicle especially at the prices they were available before O'bama stopped the DOD from selling them. I think President Trump had again made them available. They still are not cheap, but far less than a lifetime of pension and dependent support.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 271 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.