GLSmith wrote:
B4 u throw money at monitors, fully recognize that the color, etc is being handled by the video card.....Monitors just display what the video card sends them. Determine ur needs, is this a family PC I.e....young folks doing gaming?..Once you determine a quality video card, are your pictures raw imaging vs jpg or tiff?... do u have enough memory to adequately handle the amount of transactions? As I am primary user of my PC and my photography is centered on 3 specialties, auto road racing (credentialed)lighthouse & rocket launches (credentialed), the video card selection was simplistic, I upgrade to 2 25 inch View Sonic monitors as my old monitor was 8 years old and not capable of the SVGA needs etc...Again, the video card is the most important selection
B4 u throw money at monitors, fully recognize that... (
show quote)
I believe that for photo processing (not video) any of today's basic graphics cards with 2G memory will get the job done. You don't need a super gamer's card for still image work, the graphics in gaming "move'. In other words the image has to refresh incredibly fast for games and that requires a different breed of video card, the image hardly ever has to refresh at all for photos until you make a change. That aside, assume the OP has a decent photo processing set up, what monitor would you suggest?