Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: baygolf
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 22 next>>
Aug 4, 2017 09:23:57   #
mainshipper wrote:
I just used a three foot length of 2X2 wood with a slot cut in it to hold the target and I just clip the two lights to it to illuminate it. The wood piece attaches to the tripod with the arca style clamp. I'm not home right now so I can't take a picture of what my setup looks like. As far as the distance is concerned, the software will tell you if you are the correct distance and with zooms you always adjust for max wide and max zoom separately. In a Canon there is a separate MFA setting for each. Since I assume you have a cropped sensor camera based on your use of EF-S lenses, try the adjusted length (focal length X crop factor which is 1.6 for Canon) first so for the 18-135 use the distance for 24mm for the wide and 216mm for the tele.
I just used a three foot length of 2X2 wood with a... (show quote)


Thank you!
Go to
Aug 4, 2017 08:11:19   #
cthahn wrote:
What are you calibrating the lens and camera for? Where is the calibration done. You might best leave this to someone who know what they re doing.


-Micro AF adjustments,
-inside for most lens and outside for big zooms
- this why I'm asking questions - so I can know and help the next person
Go to
Aug 4, 2017 07:37:58   #
mainshipper wrote:
I agree with the others that it is a good tool for precisely tuning the MFA on a lens/camera. I have Canon gear and have matched all my lenses to my 5D II, 5D III, and 7D II. I had my targets mounted to a piece of foam board and mount them on a tripod with lighting to illuminate it. You need a space at least 20-25 feet to do the long telephotos and less for the wide angle. You should also tape over the eyepiece while running the program. The only hassle with the software is that the newer cameras won't let the computer control the camera and requires you to manually adjust the different settings during the adjustment process. My 5D II is old school and will run hands off until it's adjusted. Licensing is via serial number that you must register with Reikan and I think you are limited to four or six. I assume you can replace a serial number if your camera changes. I have kept up with the updates but don't remember the cost.
I agree with the others that it is a good tool for... (show quote)


Thank for your feedback! But I do have a couple of followup questions, based on your feedback:

1. How are you mounting your targets to a tripod, i.e., equipment needed and/or photo of setup?

2. I have a couple of lenses that the focal length is not reflected in the FoCal distance chart, how do you determine the minimum focal distance in feet, e.g., EF 40mm, EF-S 18-55mm, EF-S 18-135mm, EF-S 55-250mm and EF 24-105?

Thanks again!!
Go to
Aug 3, 2017 19:21:45   #
TriX wrote:
I wouldn't worry about updates. I bought my copy several years ago and haven't felt the need to update. Caled all my lenses (and my son's), and I periodically recal. My original copy provides all the features I need, so haven't considered the new rev (yet). What I can tell you is that it's easy to use, accurate and repeatable, and every one of my lenses needed and were improved by MFA. In terms of improving IQ and sharpness, it's the best investment I've made. Highly recommended. Btw, I had the Lens Align system previously, and it required a judgement call as to where the in-focus spot was whereas the Focal system provides a graph of acuity vs MAF - no interpretation or judgement needed - I feel it is much more precise and accurate.
I wouldn't worry about updates. I bought my copy s... (show quote)


Thanks!
Go to
Aug 3, 2017 10:31:22   #
peterg wrote:
Focal works very well if carefully used. The target should be at the proper distance and well lit. Everything must be stable to prevent vibrations. My FoCal is not a subscription; but they do charge for major updates which I think are normally more than 12 months apart. Bottom line: I'd buy it again.


Thanks for your feedback!
Go to
Aug 3, 2017 09:51:54   #
Can you tell me the pros and cons of this software for calibrating your camera and lens with a Canon camera? One concern I have is the update policy, which is only 12 months from the date of purchase. Does this mean that software update beyond 12 months will require you to buy the software again?

LensAlign LensAlign MkII with FocusTune V4 Software is about $10.00 cheaper, but it seems to be more labor intensive to use.
Go to
Jul 19, 2017 10:19:14   #
Gret pic! What camera and lens did you use?
Go to
Jul 8, 2017 11:13:00   #
I'm a Canon shooter and I have two camera bodies: SL1 and 70D and when I travel out town I only take the SL1. The SL1 is very light and can use EF and EF-S lenses. For traveling light and getting good if not great pictures this the camera for me.

I took a 17 days train trip and carried my camera and the following lenses: 18-135, 50, 40, 55-250 and 10-18. I would say that 98% of my pictures were taken with the 18-135mm. And the other 2% of the pictures taken was because those lenses were in my bag and not that I needed them. I would say take your 18-270 and a small external flash, I did not want to use the on camera flash.
Go to
Jul 5, 2017 21:04:26   #
For me, I always use a plain camera strap and carry sling camera bag. I only take my camera out of the bad when I'm ready to shot then I put it back in the bag.
Go to
Jul 1, 2017 18:37:12   #
Could someone comment on why the 6d II only has a sync speed of 180, my 70D had a sync speed of 200.
Go to
Jun 29, 2017 15:33:26   #
jeep_daddy wrote:
To fix it one time, just open the first image in the Develop module, correct the lens profile to the right one, then select all the rest of the images, (Ctrl/A) and then Sync them. This will correct all of them now. But in the future, make a preset with the proper lens profile and when you import the images taken while using that lens, enact that profile upon import and they will automatically have the correct lens profile right from the start.


This is what have done, but sometimes I might be using several lenses on the same day so using a predefined preset would not a good idea.

Thanks
Go to
Jun 29, 2017 07:09:50   #
Gene51 wrote:

But I am sure that the current version of LRCC has the correct profile and this problem may have gone away. I can't test it, I don't have that lens.


Yes, I'm using LRCC current version and it still has this problem.

Thanks!
Go to
Jun 28, 2017 14:56:50   #
rmalarz wrote:
You can actually create your own profile using Adobe software for that specific purpose.
--Bob

Thx, but that above my pay grade.

Note I just checked ACR and it does have the profile for the Tamron 24-70, so Adobe needs to update Lightroom.
Go to
Jun 28, 2017 14:42:33   #
Linary wrote:
According to the Adobe list of supported lenses in Lightroom (and Photoshop ACR), the Tamron 24-70 is not supported.

Thanks, they have a profile for Nikon, but not for canon. I guess I will have to just wait on Adobe or do my PP in DXO for pics taken with the Tamron. I see that they have a profile for the SIGMA 24-70mm F2.8, maybe that is why Sigma is being used. However, when I use the pull down it shows Tamron as a possible selection for that field.
Go to
Jun 28, 2017 13:35:16   #
blackest wrote:
Sounds like you might be shooting on Pentax the exif information for tamron and sigma sometimes uses the same lens ID you probably will need to use the sync function in develop to switch all to the tamron. Dxo when finding an ambiguous profile will ask you to clarify things and if you want to apply the same answer to the rest of that import. The adobe forums may get you a definitive answer.


I'm shooting with a Canon 70D and I have been using sync for correction. Thx for your comments
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 22 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.