Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: fetzler
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 187 next>>
Aug 14, 2023 08:16:02   #
moonhawk wrote:
If you believe the 150-400 is heavy and expensive, you should try to imagine what a full frame equivalent would cost and weigh.

That would be a 300-800 f/4.5 zoom with a built in TC that would get you 1000mm. It hurts my shoulders just thinking about it, and you'd be cryung all the way to the bank.

And you probably wouldn't get nearly as good weather sealing or IS.
If you believe the 150-400 is heavy and expensive,... (show quote)


When you compare the price of the OM lens to similar lenses for larger cameras (e.g. Nikon, Cannon) you will find this lens is very cheap and light weight and yet of high quality.
Go to
Aug 13, 2023 10:55:27   #
Burkphoto uses Lumix Cameras. I have Olympus bodies but several Lumix lenses. Certainly, Lumix cameras have many fine features.

What is the deal with 700mm? Is this a full frame equivalent focal length? I have micro 4/3 lenses from 3mm (Fish eye) to 300mm. Certainly there are a few lenses with a bit longer focal length. It takes quite a bit of photographic experience to successfully use super long focal length lenses.
Go to
Aug 11, 2023 11:42:15   #
jerryc41 wrote:
A good cell signal should be available everywhere. So many people have emergencies, but there is no cell signal to call for help.


There are many places in the country where there is no service. I was just in a semi ghost town in the MT mountains. No cell service there. There are many more such places in the western US, Northern Michigan and New England (topography is a big problem there). My old house in CT had no cell service but town centers did.
Go to
Aug 11, 2023 10:36:48   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I went to the Senior Citizens meeting yesterday, and a woman wanted to use her computer to show a slideshow I made. Unfortunately, without Wi-Fi, she couldn't connect. I told her to download it and show it the next time. They suggested that I make a Facebook page to display whatever there is to display. I did that last night, and I posted some pictures. Unfortunately, I was not able to post the four-minute slide show (353MB). I tried several times, but it was "loading" for over an hour each time. I'm trying again today. It worked find on YouTube.

What surprised me is that out of the group of twenty-one, only eleven have computers. How can they live like that? Even with a basic Chromebook, they could get and send email, browse the web, and use Facebook and YouTube. I'm not about to start promoting this, but it was a surprise to me to learn that so many are unconnected.

I got started decades ago with the Apple IIe, and I've been hooked ever since.
I went to the Senior Citizens meeting yesterday, a... (show quote)


It is indeed surprising as computers today are appliances and necessary for e-mail, on-line shopping and reading the news, etc. All this easy stuff doesn't require great technical competence. I am no fan of cell phones and use mine rarely but I have a cheap one for travel. (Cell coverage at my house is marginal). It is a mental illness to have one's attention constantly buried in the cell phone screen at the expense of interacting with the real world.

Having said this. My 98 year-old mother-in-law has none of these these technological devices and I think that it is dangerous. We lost her for two days while she was stuck in an airport. My mother-in-law lives independently and plays golf and bridge but is not quite a sharp as she once was. We also lost track of her for a week or so after a hurricane. My wife supervises my mother-in-law's finances and important correspondence must take place via snail mail. Many things could be done faster and more conveniently via e-mail and rarely by FAX. My wife does have on-line access for some things.

Incidentally, If one lives in a remote area or one prone to natural disasters a device like a Garmin in-reach allows one to stay in touch and receive emergency services via satellite communications.
Go to
Jul 24, 2023 13:03:19   #
Chris63 wrote:
Sony A 7II.
I tried both and the photos seem to look identical.

Thanks


It is always to start with a RAW file. You have much better control over the final result. RAW files always contain color information. You can, for instance, try different color filters in Post. I only use jpeg for utilitarian photos. You can always shoot shoot Raw + jpeg.

My Olympus PenF can be used simulate Orthochromatic film by applying a cyan filter (removes or reduces the red channel) If I shoot RAW + jpeg I can view the result in the viewfinder and the jpeg and still have the RAW file to make final adjustments. It is easiest to use OM workspace to start in my case. BTW few cameras have the ability to apply a Cyan filter in camera.
Go to
Jul 21, 2023 13:15:17   #
There is both a traditional Mongolian script and a Mongolian Cyrillic script. The latter being used commonly since the Soviet era and helping increase the literacy rate of the nation. Beginning in 2025 the Government plans to publish documents in both scripts. Earlier attempts to use a Roman Alphabet were unsuccessful.
Go to
Jul 21, 2023 13:02:10   #
burkphoto wrote:
Yeah... But there's a real market need for horizontal and vertical video, and it has been addressed.


Perhaps you are right but vertical video really sucks.
Go to
Jul 21, 2023 13:01:05   #
larryepage wrote:
This question interests me, also. As an Industrial Engineer, I believe strongly in using the proper tool to do the job.

Most video captured with still-format cameras or cell phones isn't very good if closely examined. It tends to be very "home movieish," with too much unintentional camera movement and way too much panning and zooming. Many video websites are the same, even if they use purposed video cameras.

There is a term for this style, "cinema verite." It was popular in the movies and on television for a few minutes many years ago. Remenber "Hill Street Blues?" For me, it fails totally with today's excessively sharp high resolution images. It is laborious and tiring (and tiresome) to watch.

If this communicates too much thought to you, let me just sum it up by saying that most video today is really pretty bad. The quality bar is set pretty low for pictures that move.
This question interests me, also. As an Industrial... (show quote)


I too think that using the right tool for the job is important. Serious cinema requires appropriate equipment. One Piece of equipment is a tripod. Using this reduces the shakes.

Many folks are not, however, shooting, serious cinema. A still camera is quite adequate for a YouTube interview or demonstration. Improper using of panning and zooming is bad no matter what type of equipment is used.

If you are using a cell phone for stills or video you are not being serious. That's OK because one doesn't have to always be serious. Cell phones are also adequate for acquiring a variety of utilitarian photos. I have used them to photograph parts and the back of electronic devices with poor access.
Go to
Jul 20, 2023 12:48:23   #
burkphoto wrote:
The "old computer running an old operating system" is not a solution, for the very problem the original poster noted: His financial institutions' sites are incompatible with the browsers that run on that old operating system. He might be able to print again, but would be locked out of his accounts, the very issue that caused him to upgrade his operating system in the first place.

Simply put, there comes a time when solving a problem with old hardware incompatibility with a new OS requires new hardware. We are no longer living in an age where you could buy a piece of "capital equipment," depreciate it in a straight line for ten years, and use it, "almost free," for the next decade.

Addendum: Virtualization may be a solution. With an Intel Mac and Parallels Desktop, an older version of MacOS or Windows could be installed and run the older system and older printer driver. Consulting Parallels may be a worthwhile adventure.
The "old computer running an old operating sy... (show quote)


Here the old computer is just used for printing. Inconvenient indeed but may a quick fix. Another user mentioned the use of old computers in companies where new computers are unusable. This solution preserves the use valuable and quite serviceable equipment. When working in a company, I purchased high priced refurbished computers just to keep equipment and software working.
Go to
Jul 20, 2023 10:28:48   #
The perfect solution is to go and purchase another printer and throw away the old one. While even PCs can have issues with printer drivers, Macs are notorious for creating issues. On my PC I have some 20 year old software that works just fine. An old computer running an old operating system may also be a solution.

I am sorry for your pain. Good Luck.
Go to
Jul 16, 2023 10:52:24   #
Well, you chose to live in AZ. In the summer it is hell on Earth. I never would live there.
Go to
Jul 14, 2023 15:12:40   #
I have a few Clara Rockmore Recordings. She is excellent. My aunt was 1st violinist in the Detroit Symphony many decades ago. She and Clara sound very similar when playing certain pieces.
Go to
Jul 12, 2023 10:06:00   #
SteveR wrote:
A homeless man collecting bottles and cans finds a dead woman. In anguish, he says, "c'mon, Dorothy, click your heels and wake up."

Do you have any other favorite lines from tv shows or movies?


We're Authorized.
Go to
Jul 6, 2023 10:26:36   #
Architect1776 wrote:
By Chris Gampat
07/02/2023
The Phoblographer

"The Nikon Z8 is best described as an ergonomic wonder of a camera for anyone that used a DSLR. It essentially feels just like a DSLR but is much smaller and designed for Z-mount lenses instead. Photographers will really enjoy it when shooting events, photographing wildlife, doing portraiture, and so much more. It’s only going to get better with firmware updates too. Lucky for you, we’ve also reviewed the most Nikon Z mount lenses of any publication still standing. So we’re here to help you choose the best lens for the Nikon Z8 that you need. Dive in below with us for our findings:

Here’s some insight into how to use this guide to find the best lens for the Nikon z8:

The Phoblographer’s various product round-up features are done in-house. Our philosophy is simple: you wouldn’t get a Wagyu beef steak review from a lifelong vegetarian. And you wouldn’t get photography advice from someone who doesn’t touch the product. We only recommend gear we’ve fully reviewed in these roundups.
If you’re wondering why your favorite product didn’t make the cut, there’s a chance it’s on another list. If we haven’t reviewed it, we won’t recommend it. This method keeps our lists packed with industry-leading knowledge. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Nikon Z Mount (which we’re focusing on here) has many lenses available. And so, we’re choosing the best lens for the Nikon z8. Luckily, we’ve reviewed the vast majority of lenses for Nikon Z Mount. You can find them in this guide here. To further clarify this statement, we’re not talking about lenses that can and should be adapted to the camera.
So what makes a lens the best lens for the Nikon z8? Well, Nikon lenses tend to not have a lot of character or anything that makes many of them unique — aside from a few focal lengths. The color rendered can surely be pretty, though. We’re also only selecting full-frame lenses. Further, because the Nikon z8 is a camera meant to do serious work, we’re focusing on weather-resistant lenses. Versatility is also a big thing here.
Nikon’s autofocus isn’t what Canon and Sony are capable of doing.
NIKON Z 24-120MM F4 S
You’re probably wondering why we chose this lens. Well, there are several reasons. First off, the Z mount variant of this lens is far better than the F mount version. This lens is weather resistant and is unique in that it’s a 24-120mm instead of the standard 24-105mm. It gives you significantly more reach that you don’t appreciate until you need it. That reach furthers when you go into the DX crop mode with the Nikon z8. The image quality and autofocus are also satisfactory for what the lens is designed to do. Sure, some folks may want an f2.8 zoom instead. But honestly, Nikon could do faster zoom lenses. They just haven’t yet. F2.8 lenses often aren’t enough for really dark situations — especially those where you’re photographing POCs that have a lot of melanin in low light.
PROS
Nano Crystal and ARNEO lens coatings
Super silent S-line lens
Macro focusing capabilities as close as 1.15 ft at 120mm
Weather sealed lens barrel and rubber gasket over the lens mount
Customizable L-Fn button
Dedicated manual focus ring in addition to the control ring
Only $100 more than the Z 24-70mm f4 S that doesn’t have most of the above capabilities
77mm filter thread means I can use a lot of my existing circular filters from F-mount pro lenses
Rugged construction. Mine fell from 4 feet high and smashed to the ground. Apart from a broken UV filter, a few missed AF shots on the day, and some scuffing, it continues to work perfectly.
CONS
No Vibration Reduction in the lens. I’m guessing this was left out to keep the costs down. Nikon Z full-frame bodies have in-body stabilization already.
You’ll miss the satisfying zoom ring lock if you’re upgrading from the Z 24-70 f4 lens.
Not the most satisfying bokeh at 120mm

3 Other Great Options Some Might Think Is The Best Lens For The Z8
NIKON Z 85MM F1.2 S
PROS
It’s super sharp.
11-blade aperture and f1.2 create beautiful soft backgrounds.
RAW colors are actually a really great starting point with the ProStandard profile.
While technically sharp, a bit of character is possible with vignetting, flare, and bokeh.
The wide aperture is a big help in low light, and the focus isn’t terrible here.
It’s weather-sealed.
CONS
It’s heavy.
The autofocus had difficulty keeping up with action on the Z7 II (but performed better on the Z9).
Colors on JPEG Standard weren’t as pleasing in flat light, wire service photographers won’t really like this. Nor will their editors.
It’s significantly more expensive than the f1.8 lens.

NIKON Z 70-200MM F2.8 S
PROS
Spectacular bokeh and color
Excellent sharpness
Weather-sealed
Plenty of controls
Much closer focusing than other 70-200mm lenses
Stabilized
CONS
Autofocus missed about 20 percent of the time for sports.
Hood lock is annoying but does loosen up with use.

NIKON Z 50MM F1.2 S
PROS
Excellent balance between sharp and sterile
Beautiful bokeh
Accurate colors
Weather-sealed
Digital lens info display
CONS
Long and heavy
Autofocus is slower than the competition.
By Chris Gampat br 07/02/2023 br The Phoblographer... (show quote)


I do not criticize any of the equipment that you mention. Indeed a 24-120mm (FF) is a very good general purpose lens.

It is, however, foolish to think there is a best lens. The choice of lens depends on what you want to photograph. A macro photographer, a bird photographer, landscape photographer, and a street photographer will choose different lenses. Different camera bodies may also be more suitable to particular tasks that others.
Go to
Jul 5, 2023 16:45:59   #
A picture of the back of the cards would be useful. UHS II cards have 2 rows of contacts UHS I cards have a single row. the Roman numeral II suggest these are indeed UHSII.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 187 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.