Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: murm
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30 next>>
Sep 26, 2013 07:06:37   #
Could anyone tell me if this post is still on todays topics page, It's not on mine anymore.
Thanks if you can let me know.
Cheers !
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 06:31:45   #
saxkiwi wrote:
Slightly wrong there from what Ive heard there is only one aussie one brit and the others Kiwis. Both boats are NZ made except the hull. Hardly any Americans have even heard of the americas cup. Its all about a rich boys sport. I also find it strange that the last 7 races that they would blitz NZ. Could it be the automated gadget they installed to operate something that would free up a man to help with grinding? I don't think they could just become super humans after one night and then go on to win every race. something is not right there. Some would call it cheating others would call it within the rules I guess.
Slightly wrong there from what Ive heard there is ... (show quote)


I'm not wrong, Aussie skipper, strategist & a heap more,,,,
http://www.theage.com.au/sport/aussies-aboard-the-victorious-team-usa-20130926-2uf7g.html
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 05:29:12   #
Julianmpb wrote:
Also needed a Brit tactitian


Did the Yanks even build the boat ?
Go to
Sep 26, 2013 05:06:50   #
Piloted by an Aussie & three other Australians as crew,,,, out of all America you can't find a Captain.
Just wondering how it is reported over there,,,, do they mention he is Australian ?
Go to
Sep 23, 2013 06:32:50   #
I've said this before, be more worried about your doctor,,,
http://www.infowars.com/doctors-kill-2450-more-americans-than-all-gun-related-deaths-combined/
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 08:40:19   #
Nice job, that's my kind of HDR.
Cheers !
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 06:53:02   #
winterrose wrote:
Oh, God help us all. Another "artist". Seems whenever someone completely stuffs up taking a very simple to execute photograph they call it "art" and suddenly it's respectable. Perhaps I should set my camera to bulb and let it roll down the stairs. Behold! Picasso, stand aside!


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Sep 22, 2013 06:42:06   #
rook2c4 wrote:
Edmund, don't let the nay sayers put you down. If it is beautiful to you, that's what matters most. Yes, it is unconventional. But I for one like it. When Picasso initially took up the Cubist style, many art critics laughed at his unconventional approach to art. Today Picasso is considered an important milestone, with a name everyone recognizes.


What a load of crap, just like the picture,,, delete it & move on.
Go to
Sep 20, 2013 03:23:12   #
JP/Avery wrote:
Best answer!
I use a 70-200l series on a 7d for sports, 7d as its a crop comes eith a built in converter (basically turns it into (105-300).but to get serious you cant beat a prime lense like a 300 or 400mm problem is theyre big dollars!:(
Sigma make dome great lenses for a budget, ie the 50-500 gor around $1000 but u need a monobar just to carry same with the big l series lenses.the lense ur using is gd for convenious but u suffer in picture quality n u will wonder why ur pics dont come out as gd as u see from others.
Ur only as gd as ur equipment will let u be.like driving a 4 cylinder car againt v8s (still goes well just doe
Best answer! br I use a 70-200l series on a 7d for... (show quote)


WHAT ????????????
Go to
Sep 19, 2013 08:12:52   #
fstop22 wrote:
If your looking for a slide rail or any else like this you just need to post the Question in the Macro Forum as several of the guys over here use them. Just ask and they will point you in the right direction.


So you guys are only interested in answering questions posted in your own little section. The question even has the word Macro in it's title, right in front of your face, but it's not in your Macro part of the forum so they don't give out advice,,,,,, interesting !
Go to
Sep 19, 2013 06:41:07   #
I think a lens with image stabilisation would help,
Cheers !
Go to
Sep 16, 2013 21:26:22   #
Bugfan wrote:
Actually forty years ago I was using a bellows then too to do tiny subjects on 35mm film so this kind of gear has always been part of my kit. At the time it was a different brand as well.

As to an average shot of a flower, I just grabbed what was first at hand to illustrate what the gear can do. I suppose I should have selected something more artistic, smaller and with greater impact, sorry. I'll consider that next time.

I would add too though, that there's not much value to getting too excited about this technology, Nikon no longer makes a bellows and the odd one that still exists made by others is hellishly expensive and used bellows are often hard to find. Today with the increasing resolution of the cameras the bellows is rapidly becoming obsolete it seems. I still have one and use one more out of tradition than out of necessity.

That average picture of the flower in fact could have been done without a bellows. But I often also photograph something like this to illustrate scale when I go really small. Since the bellows is set up already it's easier to use it to quickly do the snapshot.

Still though, it does allow me to capture the odd thing I can't do with just a lens and a few extension tubes.
Actually forty years ago I was using a bellows the... (show quote)


Thanks for filling me in, I now understand the reason for the bellows.
Cheers mate .
Go to
Sep 16, 2013 09:10:46   #
Bugfan wrote:
In terms of macro, this is my macro set up. I use a Nikon D3 or a D800 depending on the subject. Light comes from my Nikon Macro flash, I place two flash heads on the lens and another on a surface usually behind my subject though that also depends on the subject. The flash heads are controlled through the flash commander on the top of the camera. The bellows is a Nikon PB6. The lens is the Nikon 105mm macro. It's all mounted on a Manfrotto tripod with a ball head.

There is no electrical connection between the lens and the camera so everything has to be done manually. I usually set the camera to M and I control exposures by individually adjusting flash intensity and/or adjusting ISO. I have two old Nikon macro lenses that still have an aperture ring, the old 60mm and the 200mm. For those I can set the camera to A and adjust exposure using the aperture ring though even then manual is often less hassle.

As the bellows is extended more and more I also lose a lot of light so sometimes I'll use a mirror to shine sunlight at my subject so that I can focus the rig before taking a picture.

Below is a front and side view of the set up and a resulting image.
In terms of macro, this is my macro set up. I use ... (show quote)


Wow,,,, that's a lot of moneys worth of gear to take an average shot of a flower,,,,,, have you been using it long ?
Go to
Sep 16, 2013 08:35:03   #
Rongnongno wrote:
Thank you for a new information that I was not aware of as the 'puck'. I was aware of the Sigma calibration offered but not as 'puck'.

That said, the post could have been done w/o the insult. Thank you.


Do some research first before jumping in with ill informed information that leaves people confused & does nothing to help anyone, this joints full of it, this is not just relating to you.
Go to
Sep 15, 2013 08:43:13   #
sb wrote:
It seems like a reasonable product, especially for the bridge cameras with 1200mm telephotos, encouraging folks to take photos well beyond the range of their in-camera flash. Much cheaper than a good flash, but also much less versatile.


Thanks for putting some thought into the question, I agree it would have it's uses if it does what it says.
Cheers !
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.