Richard94611 wrote:
After this past weekend's big Republican convention/meeting, participants seem to believe that what they need to do is to "rebrand" the party. Rebranding is essentially a publicity/public relations maneuver with the purpose of convincing the public that a product is something that they have not previously seen it as.
The assumption seems to be that people will not perceive what the party continues to stand for (the wealthy) and against (minorities, women, gays, immigrants, the poor and the disenfranchised). We definitely need an active second party, but if the Republican thinkers continue to believe that rebranding rather than essential change will do the trick and let them win future elections, they are wrong. People aren't that stupid. They will continue to perceive who the Republican Party really stands for, not whom they say it stands for.
After this past weekend's big Republican conventio... (
show quote)
The Republican party is a party that place symbolism above action and the good of their donors above the good of the nation. I guess when Rush Limbaugh the defacto voice of the Republican party states the problem is that they (the Republicans) are not conservative enough, he is in fact illustrating the very issues why they cannot get enough votes to elect anyone. Republican candidates receive fewer votes than Democratic candidates nation wide. Their platform is quite simply not what the majority of Americans want. It is that simple. Now, you can fuss and fume and say that the electorate is incorrect but that is your opinion or your friends opinion and you are out-numbered. So complain, fuss and fume all you want. You are now in the minority of the electorate and your voice will be heard but unheeded.