Posts for: billnikon
Nov 1, 2019 08:09:36 #
Tom DePuy wrote:
I thought maybe some on here would enjoy it.
Actually, I have done the reverse many, many, many times.
Nov 1, 2019 08:07:18 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
I freeze them in Carbonite for long-term storage and to prevent escape.
What a SUPER idea.
Oct 31, 2019 10:29:58 #
out4life2016 wrote:
Hello and thank you in advice for all who give adv... (show quote)
There is no one way to set up a studio. And there is no right way or wrong way to set up a studio.
You need to shoot, you need to read, you need to look at as many video's as possible. Here are a few to look at, when your done with ALL of these, look at some more, shoot some more and read some more. But most important, develop your OWN style, not some one else's. Stay true to your development as a photographer.
https://video.search.yahoo.com/search/video;_ylt=A0geKLoj77pd__wA63VXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEyamZhMGRqBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQTA1OTlfMQRzZWMDc2M-?p=how+to+set+up+a+simple+photography+studio&fr=mcafee
Oct 31, 2019 10:21:45 #
grahamfourth wrote:
Probably a dumb question, but for long term storage (>5 months) of “heavy” telephoto lenses (e.g. Nikon 200-500) does it matter whether the lens is stored horizontally or vertically? Or to put it another way, is there any slow deformation or creep of the plastic components over time from the overall weight of the lens? Thank you very much in advance.
For long term storage I lay the camera down horizontally, that was the way it was shipped so that is the way I store it. I also use a Ruggard Dry Cabinet.
My long lenses are never put vertically.
Oct 31, 2019 10:18:38 #
trapper1 wrote:
I have seen reference to the number of clicks a camera has made. I assume that this means the number of pictures that the camera has made. If this assumption is correct, out of curiosity, how many clicks can a camera, say a Nikon DSLR 5600 for example, make before it starts requiring repairs or starts to malfunction?
DEPENDS on a variety of factors. How many times have you dropped your camera, is it stored in a humidity free environment, do you use single exposures or at a high frames per second, do you shoot at 1/30 of a second or 1/1000 sec.
Again, their are a lot of factors, I have seen shutters that are rated for 150,000 break down at 50,000 and I have seen camera's rated for 150,000 still going after 240,000.
I would think your shutter can give at least 150,000, but I also believe the answer may be in your manual.
You can get YOUR current shutter count here.
https://www.apotelyt.com/shutter-count/nikon-d5600-actuations
Oct 31, 2019 10:09:13 #
Moomoo48 wrote:
I take a lot of pictures of family at ice hockey r... (show quote)
I believe your meter read the ice, and your meter said "WOW, if this bright, better stop down". In other words, your meter got fooled because of the brightness of the bright ice.
You need to get a close up reading of a player, then use that setting. I am surprised that you did not check your exposures right away since you have a digital camera. When I shoot hockey I use manual everything, get the exposure right for the first shot and all of your other shots will be OK because the lighting is usually consistent.
Oct 31, 2019 10:03:07 #
kamilion wrote:
What composition technique people choose or prefer for photos depicting reflections in a landscape? The rules of thirds don’t seem to be a good choice in this situation. Attached is an example somewhere between halves and thirds.
The rule of thirds is a rule, and you know what they say, rules are made to be broken, but then again, NO.
Oct 31, 2019 09:59:31 #
out4life2016 wrote:
I’m looking for a professional system that allows me to carry camera over the shoulder and not around the neck. I shoot mainly a 6D MarkII and a tamron 150-600G2 lens and several smaller lenses for portrait and landscape. I want to be able to use tripod or monopod without having to remove stap every time. Do they make such an item
You have an expensive camera. Your camera deserves this
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1278394-REG/blackrapid_361005_sport_breathe_single_strap.html?sts=pi-ps&pim=Y
Oct 30, 2019 09:20:57 #
WDCash wrote:
I have been enjoying seeing and hearing about the IQ of these 2 new lenses. Both claim to preform well with their respective tc. Does anyine have any jaw dropping examples of one bumped x 1.4?
You will not get jaw dropping images from using a 1.4 teleconverter on a Sigma 150-600. You will get OK images from the Sigma 150-600 without a teleconverter.
You are better off not using a 1.4 on the Sigma 150-600 as that lens is typically soft at 600 without a converter.
So, my advice would be to shoot without a teleconverter.
teleconverters work best on fast primes, like a 300 2.8, 400 2.8, 500 4, and 600 4, even the 300 4 will give good results.
Teleconverters give their worst results on slow zooms, like the 150-600, resulting in focus hunting, out of focus images, and soft images, especially at the telephoto end of the zoom.
Reality bites every once in a while.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.
Oct 30, 2019 09:11:30 #
kibbles304 wrote:
I have been using Nikon D7100 and love the camera.... (show quote)
I have found the battery power just fine, I shoot wildlife every morning in Florida Wetlands and usually shoot at 10 fps.
According to the CIPA-rating, the Nikon D500 can take 1240 images on a single charge. Given the relatively demanding energy usage of the CIPA procedures, this rated number should be achievable or be surpassed in most practical situations.
Oct 30, 2019 09:08:15 #
hogilbert wrote:
What if any are the advantages/disadvantages of using a Gimbal head as opposed to a standard ball head. I shoot mostly landscapes and night sky with D750 usually 20mm 2.8
If you ONLY shoot landscapes a Ball head is good. That is what I use for landscapes, I use a Wimberley Gimbal head for wildlife photography.
I find the Gimbal tripod head actually bulky when I am out shooting landscapes.
Oct 30, 2019 09:06:11 #
Abinoone wrote:
I do a lot of wildlife photography with my Nikkor ... (show quote)
Yes, the Wimberley costs more, and their is a good reason for that. You will find the Wimberley constantly great. I use it and highly recommend it for anyone who is SERIOUS about what they do.
Affordable does not mean better.
Oct 30, 2019 09:03:06 #
hobbit123 wrote:
I have a D850 and would like opinions on what comb... (show quote)
I use both the 200-500 5.6 Nikkor and the new 500 5.5 Nikkor with great results from the D850. Please do not use the 2X teleconverter as it degrades the image especially on a zoom lens.
I would strongly suggest getting the Nikon 200-500 mm lens. It is a great value for the price and will give you great images.
Oct 30, 2019 08:51:22 #
jbk224 wrote:
My SB-800 finally died. Brought it into Nikon's Melville service center and they confirmed..also, they no longer can service this problem. Then, surprisingly, by email, they offered me a refurbished upgrade of another flash. I opted for the SB-5000 (Z6). Price was less than buying 'Used - E+ or Mint' from any of the reputable companies. And, it comes with a 90 day guaranty..just in case. Thank you Nikon.
Although I am a Nikon guy, Canon, Sony, and many other camera manufactures are grasping the concept that customer relations IS the corner stone of any company that wants to stay in business.
If you are honest and contrite with a business most of the time you will come out on top.
Oct 29, 2019 10:28:13 #
Bill 45 wrote:
I have: Zeiss Contessa -- Retina IIIC ---Speed Graphic. That are totally manual camera.
Had a Retina IIIc, single stroke, loved that camera.