Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: billnikon
Page: <<prev 1 ... 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 ... 1187 next>>
Dec 29, 2019 06:20:59   #
Kbelz67 wrote:
What is your process for critiquing your own photos? I have been thinking about selling them and I want to put out a great photo. Yes, photography like other art forms, is highly subjective but how do you not fall into the trap of not seeing the flaws in your work. For example, I have worked on photos to get them where I like them but when put out for critiques, they get ripped apart on things I did not see or seemed on par with other well liked images. I am working on getting better but still need work.
What is your process for critiquing your own photo... (show quote)


I have photo shows, for me, if a photo sells, it must be liked. I used to take action shots of birds and wildlife but I have found that these images do not sell. What sells is portrait type images of birds and wildlife, along with unique lighting on them.
So, I have adjusted my shooting techniques to match what folks buy. Not sure if buying habits are exactly the way to improve my images but it has improved my bottom line.
For general photography, I simply please myself, I could care less what others think.
And, in my shows, if I like a particular image, I will present it regardless if it sells on does not sell. I like to display some of my images that I like. I mix them in with good selling images.
Remember, most of all, critiques are SUBJECTIVE, keep that in mind, my best advice is, shoot for what YOU like, most famous artists over the centuries did work for money from rich benefactors but also created images to please themselves. So, please yourself and to hell with everyone else.
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:13:18   #
MT Shooter wrote:
First tip would be to get a real camera, best option by far.


But do not buy from certain vendors, shipping could be help up during a back ground check on your posting habits.
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:10:22   #
Robertl594 wrote:
I am experiencing a new issue with my D850. My images appear to be much softer and some out of focus on the LCD screen than they used to be. The images are actually tack sharp when viewing them on my computer. Very disconcerting as I question whether I got the shot or not. I end up taking more photos that I need because of this. I shoot RAW. I know that the images shown on the LCD are jpeg but they seem to be getting worse.
Any comments would be appreciated.
RL


Call Nikon at 1-800-645-6687. But you better hurry, Tony (the idiot Northrup) says Nikon is going out of business).
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:08:48   #
vungtau557 wrote:
Hi You All, Im heading to Yosemite in april 2020 and was wondering what to take equipment wise. Ive done some landscape photography but found that i was not very happy with it. yes, i go crop crazy. My gear consists of the following Nikon D500, D750 Lens Nikon 18-300, Sigma 150-600, tokina 100mm, Sigma 35mm Art and Nikon 35-70 plus monopod and tripod. Any ideas of what i should take and or leave behind. Thanks everyone.


Based on your choice of lens (excluding the Nikon 35-70 and the 18-300) it won't matter much what you take, you will get unacceptable results.
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:05:49   #
barrdennis wrote:
I am ready to get a prime lens for the Nikon 850 for doing portraits and wedding. need some feedback


NO prime will do it all at a wedding. The wedding lens is the Nikon 24-70 mm. If you don't get one, you will stay an amateur.
And, you will need more than a lens to be a successful wedding photographer.
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:03:44   #
Rongnongno wrote:
A simple question...


SO, are you?
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 06:03:13   #
bobishkan wrote:
According to Tony Northrup's very recent You Tube, "Nikon is Dying", Nikon is going out of business unless they change things quickly. What do you think?


OH HELP, THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING. And since I said this on the internet, IT MUST BE TRUE.
Go to
Dec 29, 2019 05:57:10   #
Haenzel wrote:
How did you manage dof with 'almost wide open' and tele?

Amazing picture by the way...!!


Easy, when your lens has a minimum opening of 6.3, almost wide open is really stopped down.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:41:28   #
foathog wrote:
Dont you just love it when they put tape over the name of the camera?? I didnt think that they did that in those days. If I were the manufacturer I'd WANT my name shown. It's free advertising. They do that on cars too nowadays. Obviously greed is a factor.


If you don't cover a copyrighted product, you have to pay to use the image or it is considered an infringement on the copyright.
But, in modern times when James Bond movies started up, the movie guys got smart, Sony and Ford payed big bucks to have their products and names appear in the films, and that has continued to this day.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:30:45   #
quixdraw wrote:
No offense - I see every photo before I take it or I don't trip the shutter. Most cases, it isn't the camera that makes the difference.


I agree completely with your statement. The photographer is the most important part of the process. BUT, with the a6600, I get a field of view of 300-900 mm on the a6600 vs. 200-600 on the a9. With the a6600 I can put more megapixels on the subject than I could with the a9. And in that case, the camera does make a difference.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:27:53   #
tcthome wrote:
Don't own one but, don't all mirrorless show exposure adjustments & what you see is what you get?
Great pic.


Yes, you are correct, but on the a6600, as I change the exposure compensation, it also shows +.3,.7, 1 and so forth right in the viewfinder, it is a helpful secondary confirmation as to where I am on the scale.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:26:04   #
BlueMorel wrote:
Wow! Great beginning for shooting with your new camera! Are you going to change your name to BillSony now? LOL


Interesting observation on the name change. Used to work for Nikon, may be a hard thing to do at this stage of the game. But, one never knows.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:24:49   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Nice shot - clean background.


Isn't Photoshop great.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:23:50   #
chemdoc wrote:
I have been noticing some focusing issues with the above combination of body and lens that hasn't happened in the past. I have had the camera for a bit under 2 years and the lens for 18 months and never had any problems. In fact, one of my magazine photo editors commented in October how extremely sharp some recent pictures were with this setup.

Over the past 6 weeks or so I have noticed some shots that should have been tack sharp being a bit blurred. Another odd thing that happened twice in that time is that the focus in live view would not work. I would press the shutter to focus and nothing happened. I turned the camera off and back on to no avail. Removing and replacing the battery also did nothing. Finally, by removing and reattaching the lens it went back to normal.

On Christmas Eve I was taking a shot of my tree lit up at night, at ISO 64, F/8, and a 4s exposure. I was disappointed to see that the picture was blurry. I tried a few more and finally one came out sharp. I took exactly the same picture last Christmas, with the only difference that I shot at F/7.1, and every shot was absolutely crisp.

Being the chemist that I am, I started taking a lot of shots to examine different variables that might be causing this issue. Here is a short summary of my experiments from today.

1. The problem seems to disappear if I shoot at F/5.6. At F/8 or higher it's back. I actually started watching the focusing distance scale on the lens and suddenly realized that the lens was not focusing correctly. At F/8 and about 8 ft away it might focus at infinity one time, clear past infinity another, and occasionally right where it was supposed to be. All of my shots today were at exposures of 1 to 2 seconds.

2. The issue seems to happen only when I move the focus box to the side of the frame. When it's in the center there's no problem, but at the side (perhaps 1/4 of the way from the edge of the frame), the focus is way off, usually infinity. The focus box still turns green, indicating a focus lock.

3. I almost always shoot in live view, because focusing is supposed to be a bit better and I can move the focus point anywhere in the frame. But for the heck of it, I decided to compare results using the viewfinder to focus vs live view. Much to my surprise, using the viewfinder the focus was fine no matter what I did. On the edge or center of the frame, F/5.6 or F/11, no problem. I toggled back and forth between live view and the viewfinder and live view continued to fail at the edge or at smaller apertures.

4. I did a comparison test with my Nikon 14-24 F/2.8 using all of the same settings and it worked fine with either focus mode.

5. I tried both lenses on my D750 and got the same results as with the D850.

6. I tried the 24-70 with VR both on and off, with no differences noted.

7. I went outside where I could shoot at faster speeds, this time at 1/30 and F/11. When focusing at the side of the frame using live view, the focus jumped all over. I depressed the shutter several times to refocus and it kept coming out different. One time at beyond infinity and the next at 6 ft. Switching to the viewfinder there were no problems. Also, when I shot at F/5.6 and 7.1 the problem went away as well. Also, when I switched to the 14-24 everything was fine again.

I haven't called Nikon yet, as my past experiences with the tech support staff has been useless. It is clear that they know little about the equipment other than what they can read on a computer prompt, so I thought I would go to the experts at the hog and see if anyone else has observed this problem. Thanks.

Phil
I have been noticing some focusing issues with the... (show quote)


Use GROUP AUTO FOCUS, keep your subject and and focusing grid in the middle. Your problems should go away. Before you try this use the two button reset so your starting fresh.
Go to
Dec 28, 2019 08:19:00   #
ameglio wrote:
I am a beginner and have a Nikon 3400. I want to take pics of birds and need a lens bigger than my 300mm. I am looking into the Sigma 150-600 mm. F/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary lens.
Anyone have any wisdom. I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks. Amanda


My personal choice is the Nikon 200-500 5.6 lens, comes with a 5 year warranty and is an outstanding lens for the money. It is currently on sale. Read the reviews for this lens and then read the reviews for the Sigma, you will find that the Nikon has better ratings, it is also a better lens.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1175034-REG/nikon_af_s_nikkor_200_500mm_f_5_6e.html?sts=pi&pim=Y
The shot below was hand held and I have sold the print many, many times over.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 ... 1187 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.