According to The Family Handyman, if you have a whistling toilet, there is a problem: faulty fill valve, faulty supply valve, water supply valve is defective.

I think all this is a coverup for the real problem. The toilet is actually haunted. I've seen enough ghost movies on TV to know that if unusual things are happening in your life, the only logical is explanation is something supernatural. A blown fuse or a leaky toilet are signs of a supernatural infestation. If you can't sell the house fast at a low price, burn it down.

I am working with a historical society to convert some 3000 speed graphic negatives into ditigal format for records and preservation. The negatives were “stored” in metal boxes, in paper envelopes,in an unheated second floor of a local library. Using care in handling most of negatives are producing very good images so here is my question, cost is a factor as this is a non profit, but what would be the best way to preserve these negatives going forward ? Paper sleeves, in plastic bags, just paper, vacuum sealed plastic, paper envelopes in a tupper ware type container ? The newest set is 56 years with the oldest appx 75 years old.

If any of y'all are yearning or pining for the photographic publications of the past- bad news (in my opinion)! Even if the publishers found resurrecting some of those now-defunct magazines to be financially viable, they would have to seriously revamp the content that was apparent in the last years of their circulation.

If you want to go retro back to the 1960s and 60s - here's my argument. I too started as a kid interested in photography by reading Popular Photograhy, Modern Photograhy, U.S. Camer and others of that era. As I aged and progressed I went on to Petersons and professional photographers' trade publications. I read into Shuttebug and The Photo District News.

All of these older mags had better and more diverse content. The were lots of DIY projects featuring homemade and improvised equipment (great for kids), and lots of behind-the-scenes insight into the work of famous and successful photographers. Many of the writers, editors, and columnists were working photographers, prolific teachers, and technical writers. Of course, there were many reviews and arca on gear but the was a good balance of other subjects. The was plenty of advertising but again, the was more of a balance. There were many regular advertisers- camera stores, dealers, suppliers, lab services and major distributors and manufacturers. This was good- the competition was good!

As time went on the Magazines became thinner and thinner and in many cases, the gear and advertig became dominant and how-tos and in-depth articles diminished. Many of the editors and columnists retired or passed away. The professional journals were originally designed to inform and help photograhers improve their businesses- they too have suffered the same fate as their consumer counterparts.

Nostalgia-wise, I do miss READING the magazines. Relaxing in a chair with a good article was fun. After a whole day of editing on screens, bookkeeping on screens, and being tethered to screens, I don't look for more screen time at home. Every time I switch on the TV screen there is violence, chaos, and murder, and that's the news- the dramatic programs are much the same. And...right now, as we communicate, I am looking at a SCREEN! I just paid for new reading glasses- do I need them anymore?