Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: kotography4u
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
Jan 15, 2021 12:48:08   #
cedymock wrote:
Better head for your tripod, or better tripod or both. Have both lenses you referred two no problems on D750,D810 or D850, you should not have much drift once tripod is locked down.
What is the weight rating on the head you are currently using?


It's a SLIK Universal 112AF - more than 20 years old. It's been great, light and useful, but maybe time for another one? So much to spend money on...!!!


(Download)
Go to
Jan 15, 2021 12:06:04   #
dmsM43 wrote:
An "L Bracket" on your camera body should solve your problem. A gimbal head won't really help in this case. The camera and lenses that you mentioned are not out of the ordinary weight wise. In any event, the advantage of the "L Bracket" is that you can keep your tripod head level rather than tilting it to get your camera and lens into portrait mode. In the future you might want to consider a better tripod and head. But for now, the "L Bracket" should do the trick. You can find them on eBay or at any camera store.
An "L Bracket" on your camera body shoul... (show quote)


Thanks - since an "L" bracket fits within the budget for now, I'll try it! Seems like all of the other useful and very informative replies will require some more research and saving up for some wise investments! Seems like the foundation of the new edifice will need to start with a better tripod - the one I have now is ball head and just a mounting screw for the camera/lens combination - Kevin
Go to
Jan 15, 2021 11:59:01   #
As always, thanks for your thoughtful, detailed providing of insight and information! Lots to think about, research and save up for. I need to research more to decide about the issues and points you've raised. I had never even considered that the tripod itself might be the main issue, but your thought on that seems to be echoed by others, so I'm off to Google to learn more! Thanks again! -k
Go to
Jan 15, 2021 11:29:47   #
Hi All - I have Nikon 28-300 and Nikon 105 Micro lenses (among others) and am beginning to explore portrait photography. I'm finding that when using a tripod, the weight of the 28-300 and sometimes the 105 micro cause the camera (Nikon D750) to flop down (or at least drop down slightly) when camera is tilted to portrait orientation on tripod. I had thought that a lens collar (to balance the weight more evenly) might be the solution, but looking for info led me to wonder if a gimbal might be smarter, more versatile, worth the extra expense? Whether one incorporates the advantages of the other and then adds more? Can anyone chime in with thoughts about one vs. the other, whether it's worth the extra expense (cost is somewhat an issue , and "used" is not a problem, around $100 is my max). Thoughts on brands or models?
Does the gimbal solve the problem of balancing the lens weight so it doesn't "flop" or does it just give more rotational and vertical flexibility without addressing the flopping problem? Thanks in advance! I appreciate any advice or input!
Go to
Dec 20, 2020 13:27:34   #
Jimmy T wrote:
I can vouch for the throwing of "cold water" since several years back I received a very ordinary and blurry couch-sized (24 X 36") mounted print, sigh.
The gift-givers seem to think that the pic would look great in our living room, sigh.
I am wondering how to break the news to them that the pic was stolen, broken in a fall, or otherwise destroyed by a visiting three-year-old.
Please give me ideas if you have dealt with this sort of conundrum before, sigh. . .

Personally, I have three large digital frames throughout the house to display my prize (in my mind only) shots.
The digital frames literally have thousands of pics of my "best memories, friends, etc." on them, and I seldom see the same pic in a month.

Edit: At their request, I give my gift-givers a calendar of my best pics every year.

Smile (through your mask),
JimmyT Sends
I can vouch for the throwing of "cold water&q... (show quote)


If the photographer (or any other gift-giver) is a work colleague: "I have it hanging at home. It looks great." Even take a phone photo of it for them showing it hanging on the wall for a second where something else normally hangs.
If the photographer is a neighbor or relative: "I have it hanging at work. It looks great." Rinse and repeat.
No hurt feelings and if you took a photo, you have a reference point if they visit home/work and you want to reconstruct your memory. Admittedly untrue, but a white lie like "I like your haircut!" and could be better than hurt feelings brought on by bald honesty or resentment due to having to hang something that really isn't good or liked. All in all, I think people like to receive something you have put effort and thought into, even risking that it might not be their "cup of tea."
Go to
Oct 18, 2020 08:20:53   #
I saw a video recently in which the photographer was asked what kind of camera he used to produce such a beautiful photo, and he replied that his reaction when asked that question was usually along the lines of it's like after a delicious, exceptional meal, saying to the host, "That was delicious! What kind of oven do you use?" It struck me as right on the mark!
Go to
Aug 25, 2020 11:24:18   #
nathanweddings wrote:
I have been using Windows 7 for years. Long story short, new computer, Window 10. Trying to download 6 TOPAZ previously purchased plug ins for which I have the license numbers. I think I did it correctly but I don't know where to look to be able to have them show in my Photoshop CS6! Any help for an 80 year old with memory issues is greatly appreciated.


Agree that it's llikely to be in your Downloads Folder. If not there, there is a "Settings" portion of the browser you're using which lets you specify where (what folder location) downloads from that browser go. Check that setting to see where it sends downloaded files. A "Browser" is like Microsoft Explorer, Google Chrome, etc.
Go to
Aug 20, 2020 16:32:46   #
jaymatt wrote:
Perhaps you folks can help: I have searched the internet, but cannot find an answer to my question, probably because I’m not asking correctly.

I am using an iMac (High Sierra 10.13.6) and Lightroom 6.0. How do I import photos into my Mac without them also automatically going into Lightroom? I’m assuming (hoping) there’s a simple answer.

I do not intend to upgrade to the newest operating system because I am still using some 16 bit programs, and I do not intend to move to the LR subscription program, so thanks in advance for not making those suggestions.

Any help that Mac users can give will be appreciated.
Perhaps you folks can help: I have searched the i... (show quote)


Easiest way I know of is to remove your card from your camera, insert card into the card slot on the side of your iMac, wait for it to appear in Finder as Nikon SD card or whatever your computer chooses to call it, open in Finder the folder containing the pics you want to copy, click the first pic in the column, then scroll down and Shift-Click the last one you want to copy. This will highlight first pic, last pic and everything in-between. Then Command-C to copy them. Then go to (or create) folder on your hard drive in Finder where you want to deposit them, open that folder and click in the blank space in the folder to tell the iMac where you want them to land, and hit Command-V, and the computer will copy the files there. LR not involved. BTW - decline your computer's constant suggestion to "upgrade" or "update" your OS from High Sierra. My understanding is that LR6 won't run in Mojave. Someone may correct me on that, but I think that's correct.
Go to
Aug 11, 2020 08:42:14   #
Jay Pat wrote:
I have been sending images thru Google Documents.
My friend says I need to give him permission to work with the images.
I can't figure out how to do this.
Using gmail, I attach images. I'm get a message the files are too large and images will be sent thru Goggle Documents. Then I send images.
How can I give permission when i send the images?
Help!!
Thanks, Pat


This has nothing to do with legal requirements - it's a Google thing, usually issued if the recipient does not have a Gmail account - it's a "permission" to access the sender's Google Drive folder holding the pictures, not anything to do with actual permission to see or use the picture.
Go to
Jun 29, 2020 08:37:27   #
MrBob wrote:
I came across this Quote in one of my Audio Loudspeaker forums and immediately thought about photography and the debate over a pure ( whatever that is ) and an artistic interpretation. Take it for what it is.... just an early morning thought over too much coffee. " Some call the voicing of speakers an art. I don't think so. Voicing of speakers is a matter of taste like adding spices to a stew. Some like it hot, creamy or crunchy - some don't. The ancient Greeks didn't distinguish between art and craftsmanship. Same thing. Something may be art if enough people think it is ". Just a thought for the day....No debates Please !
I came across this Quote in one of my Audio Loudsp... (show quote)


I took a course many years ago in which the discussions centered on whether "art" should be popular or should try to be by definition outside the "popular." In other words, should it be accessible to most people or "beyond" the masses in order to be defined as "art." This discussion began with the ancient Greeks and continues to this day, as evidenced by your posing the issue. Is art to be avant-garde, or popular?
Go to
May 29, 2020 15:06:26   #
reminds me of a favorite Gary Larson Far Side cartoon


Go to
May 18, 2020 07:34:45   #
CO wrote:
The sensors in digital cameras don't have enough dynamic range to deal with high contrast light. I bracket photos to merge in Photomatix Pro HDR all the time. I don't think there's any way a single exposure can capture the extreme lighting of your night lighthouse photo.

I took this photo at night. I ended up taking 7 exposures each 3 f-stops apart in order to deal with the extreme range of light. I merged them in Photomatix Pro.


Nice Motel photo - reminds me of painting "Nighthawks" by Hopper. -k
Go to
Apr 7, 2020 16:22:43   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
First, LR6 is installed. Then, PSE is installed. If the PSE software does not automatically create an external editor inside LR, you have to create one and point to the PSE executable. Consider if you want to pass 16-bit TIFFs or PSDs to PSE in the ProPhoto RGB colorspace. From within LR, you'll right-click the image and select to edit that image in an external editor, selecting the PSE-2020 software. When you save and exit PSE and return to LR, the image should exist in LR. The layers will be 'flatted' within LR where you can continue editing / processing the image in LR, if desired.
First, LR6 is installed. Then, PSE is installed. I... (show quote)


Thanks for the detailed explanation, as always!
Go to
Mar 26, 2020 09:35:41   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
This is an important point for our OP, if they shoot in RAW. For JPEG files, PSE provides an excellent set of tools as plug-in to their LR.


Hi All - does anyone have a couple of minutes to describe how to set up or use PSE 2020 as a plug-in to LR6 (stand alone)? i.e., the mechanics of doing it (setting it up) and what it can be used for? Can it be used to somehow "give" LR layers?
Thanks for any thoughts!
Kevin
Go to
Sep 18, 2019 14:49:55   #
Consider a Nikon 28-300 lens - heavy but gives you the full spectrum of focal lengths you're likely to want/need.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.